16.05.2014 Views

EIPOT Final Project Report - Stockholm Environment Institute

EIPOT Final Project Report - Stockholm Environment Institute

EIPOT Final Project Report - Stockholm Environment Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ERA-NET SKEP <strong>Project</strong> <strong>EIPOT</strong> (www.eipot.eu)<br />

“Development of a methodology for the assessment of global environmental impacts of traded goods and services”<br />

EXIOPOL data<br />

To enable the estimation of environmental impacts and external costs of different economic sector<br />

activities, final consumption activities and resource consumption for countries in the EU, EXIOPOL is<br />

setting up a multi-regional input-output framework where environmental interventions are taken<br />

account of via satellite accounts – so-called environmental extensions. These extensions – in total<br />

around 130 – comprise material input, area and water usage, energy input and emissions.<br />

The compilation of material input data in EXIOPOL followed the nomenclature and categorisation of<br />

materials listed in the handbook for economy-wide material flow accounting published by the<br />

Statistical Office of the European Union (Weisz et al. 2007). The material section encompasses the<br />

aggregated material categories ‘fossil fuels’, ‘metals’, ‘construction and industrial minerals’, and<br />

‘biomass’; within these categories, materials are divided into sub-categories. For all these categories,<br />

extension data in EXIOPOL include used and unused extraction.<br />

Land area was included in the EXIOPOL database for the area used to generate biomass for<br />

economic processing using the categories ‘arable land’, ‘pasture’, and ‘forest’.<br />

With respect to water use, the database focuses on water consumption in the agricultural sector, by<br />

far the biggest water consumer. The main data source for the EXIOPOL database was the study<br />

Water Footprints of Nations by UNESCO-IHE <strong>Institute</strong> for Water Education (Chapagain and Hoekstra<br />

2004), based widely on the FAO-AQUASTAT database where water use data are given in yearly<br />

averages for five-year periods. Additionally, data from the LPJmL model (Rost et al. 2008) were used,<br />

to disaggregate blue (water retrieved from rivers, lakes and so on used for irrigation purposes) and<br />

green (precipitation) water consumption.<br />

To set up the energy extensions for EXIOPOL, the accounting principles as published by International<br />

Energy Agency (IEA)/OECD and Eurostat (OECD et al. 2004) were used. The main source of energy<br />

input data were IEA energy balances (IEA 2007a, b). IEA records the supply and use of around 60<br />

energy commodities which then had to be transferred into the SUT-format of EXIOPOL. For this<br />

process, LCA factors were used to get more detailed information on energy consumption by specific<br />

production processes.<br />

Emissions related to certain economic activities were calculated using energy use as auxiliary data.<br />

Values of energy use in certain sectors (‘activity data’) were multiplied with emission coefficients taken<br />

from international guidelines such as UNFCCC (IPCC 2006) or EMEP/CORINAIR (EEA 2007). This<br />

resulted in around 40 environmental extension vectors including air pollutants such as GHGs, metals,<br />

and others.<br />

Global datasets<br />

Energy use and CO 2 emissions from fossil fuel use for 140 countries are available from a database<br />

provided by the International Energy Agency (IEA 2008). The data is consistent with the<br />

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s sectoral approach (see IEA, 2006: chapter 5) and thus<br />

does not include emissions from international marine bunkers and international aviation. The IEA data<br />

distinguish only 18 sectors. This means that for some important industries CO 2 intensities cannot be<br />

distinguished, a relatively far-reaching limitation if trade volumes for these sectors are high. A detailed<br />

sector analysis in the course of the UK-MRIO project (Wiedmann et al. 2008b) showed, for example,<br />

that using the same average carbon intensity for the sectors 'electricity supply', 'gas supply' and 'water<br />

collection and supply' is completely inadequate. Therefore other data sources, such as EDGAR or<br />

GTAP, must be used to further disaggregate sectoral emissions (see Wilting and Vringer 2007).<br />

49

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!