EIPOT Final Project Report - Stockholm Environment Institute
EIPOT Final Project Report - Stockholm Environment Institute
EIPOT Final Project Report - Stockholm Environment Institute
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
ERA-NET SKEP <strong>Project</strong> <strong>EIPOT</strong> (www.eipot.eu)<br />
“Development of a methodology for the assessment of global environmental impacts of traded goods and services”<br />
Market Exchange Rate (MER) as a mean for currency conversion have been discussed (Ahmad and<br />
Wyckoff 2003, Peters 2007) and the difference between the two methods has been quantified in a<br />
MRIO study (Weber and Matthews 2007). Arguably, PPPs are better for cross-country comparisons of<br />
GDP and MERs are better for trade data. Whether the use of PPP and MER can be combined in an<br />
automated hybrid technique and what the quantitative effect would be of using one method over the<br />
other in the UK-MRIO model should be investigated.<br />
Linking to economic policy – Other types of studies could be of interest for traded goods. The<br />
environmental pressure is often largely connected to the kind of energy system being used.<br />
<strong>Environment</strong>al policies are different across the world and the price of fuel is influenced by national<br />
pricing policies, such as taxes or subsidies. Price effects could also be studied.<br />
Including toxic products in a harmonised way – Another interesting question is how to capture<br />
effects from the use of toxic material, such as pesticides in agriculture or chemicals used in the textile<br />
industry. Given the large number of chemicals, and the fact that their toxic effects are not always<br />
known, systematic data collection is difficult to accomplish. If environmental and economic accounting<br />
were in place internationally, this problem could at least partly be addressed.<br />
Including land use and types of management – There is a need for more data and harmonised<br />
methods to record the links between land use and traded goods. Examples include the impacts of<br />
biofuels or agricultural mega-crops on primary rainforests in the developing world.<br />
6.4 How to use results of <strong>EIPOT</strong> studies in policy?<br />
The first issue that people discuss when the data on environmental pressure in other countries are<br />
being presented is whether the environmental improvement witnessed over the last few years an<br />
illusion. Meaning, is the reduced environmental impact merely an effect of moving production to other<br />
countries? In Sweden, it is easy to point to environmental policies and activities that have been<br />
successful. Air and water pollution have decreased because environmental management has made a<br />
difference. Still, high consumption implies responsibility for environmentally polluting activities in other<br />
countries. This responsibility is only partly the consumers’, as the producers are those with the power<br />
to change production methods.<br />
In some studies, the environmental trade balance has been calculated to address the question of<br />
emissions being exported to other countries. The trade balance has often been calculated as the<br />
difference between emissions from imports and emissions from exports, or vice versa. However, trade<br />
flows and environmental pressures connected to them are more complex than this. The environmental<br />
trade balance is different for each pollutant, and it is not an easy task to figure out why it is high or low,<br />
nor if that is good or bad.<br />
After struggling with that measure of the environmental trade balance without knowing what to make of<br />
it, Swedish studies have returned to basics and presented imported embodied emissions as a part of<br />
the environmental pressure connected to Swedish consumption. This relates the size of the embodied<br />
emissions to national environmental goals, and thus shows it in perspective to a known figure.<br />
In addition to direct resource use, the indirect resources necessary to produce products for final<br />
demand can be quantified by economic-environmental models and statistical analysis. Thereby,<br />
interdependencies of different sectors are taken into account and consequently the total amount of<br />
resources required to produce final products is illustrated. These findings reflect economic activities<br />
and final demand for goods in monetary terms, which are extended by environmental data to calculate<br />
environmental pressures, such as material use, emissions and so on. Consequently, the material<br />
68