EIPOT Final Project Report - Stockholm Environment Institute
EIPOT Final Project Report - Stockholm Environment Institute
EIPOT Final Project Report - Stockholm Environment Institute
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
ERA-NET SKEP <strong>Project</strong> <strong>EIPOT</strong> (www.eipot.eu)<br />
“Development of a methodology for the assessment of global environmental impacts of traded goods and services”<br />
Table 5.3: Availability of symmetric IO tables from Eurostat in 2008<br />
Availability of SymmetricTables, Current Prices<br />
ESA 95 Table<br />
1700 Siot<br />
1800 Domestic 1900 Imports<br />
Code Country<br />
1995<br />
1996<br />
1997<br />
1998<br />
1999<br />
2000<br />
2001<br />
2002<br />
2003<br />
2004<br />
2005<br />
2006<br />
2007<br />
1995<br />
1996<br />
1997<br />
1998<br />
1999<br />
2000<br />
2001<br />
2002<br />
2003<br />
2004<br />
2005<br />
2006<br />
2007<br />
1995<br />
1996<br />
1997<br />
1998<br />
1999<br />
2000<br />
2001<br />
2002<br />
2003<br />
2004<br />
2005<br />
2006<br />
2007<br />
BE Belgium x x x x x x pp<br />
BG Bulgaria 2009 2009 2009<br />
CZ Czech Republic x x x x pp<br />
DK Denmark x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x ii<br />
DE Germany x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x pp<br />
EE Estonia x x x x x x pp<br />
IE Ireland x x 2009 x x 2009 x x 2009 pp<br />
GR Greece 2008 2008 2008 pp<br />
ES Spain x x 2009 x x 2009 x x 2009 pp<br />
FR France x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x pp<br />
IT Italy x x x x x x pp<br />
CY Cyprus 2009 2011 2009 2011 2009 2011<br />
LV Latvia x x x x x x pp<br />
LT Lithuania x x x pp<br />
LU Luxembourg x x x x x x x x x x x x x pp<br />
HU Hungary x x x x x x x x x pp + ii<br />
MT Malta<br />
NL Netherlands x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x ii<br />
AT Austria x x x x x x pp<br />
PL Poland x()* x()* x()* pp<br />
PT Portugal x x x pp<br />
RO Romania x x x x x x x x x x x x pp<br />
SI Slovenia x x x x x x x x x x x x pp<br />
SK Slovakia x x x x x x pp<br />
FI Finland x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x ii<br />
SE Sweden x x x x x x x x x pp<br />
UK United Kingdom x 2011 2011 x 2011 2011 x 2011 2011 pp + ii<br />
HR Croatia<br />
MK FYR Macedonia<br />
TR Turkey x x x<br />
NO Norway x x x x x x ii<br />
pp/ii<br />
Key to table cells: X available, XXXX derogation, YYYY derogation until year.<br />
OECD dataset<br />
The 2006 edition of IO tables published by the OECD includes 28 OECD countries (except Iceland<br />
and Luxemburg) and nine non-OECD countries (Argentina, Brazil, China, India, Indonesia, Israel,<br />
Russia, Singapore and Taiwan) in 48 harmonised sectors. The latest edition of the OECD dataset is<br />
due to be released in early 2009.<br />
The tables of the 2006 edition are based around the year 2000 (Yamano and Ahmad 2006, 2007). The<br />
underlying data are submitted to the OECD by national statistical offices, which provide data in<br />
accordance with the ISIC Revision 3 harmonised industry structure. Furthermore, NSOs can submit<br />
any relevant data (such as supply-use tables) at the most detailed and practicable level to maximise<br />
compliance and minimise costs. Most countries have submitted data using national industrial<br />
classification systems. IO tables are not compiled by all NSOs, but they do produce supply-use-tables.<br />
By using standard assumptions, these can easily be converted into symmetric IO tables.<br />
As Table.4 and Table 5.5 illustrate, most of the received data as well as those submitted in earlier<br />
years need to be converted to the requested structure, to be consistent with the industry classification<br />
used in OECD systems and are on the same price basis. The harmonisation process is explicitly<br />
described.<br />
41