16.05.2014 Views

EIPOT Final Project Report - Stockholm Environment Institute

EIPOT Final Project Report - Stockholm Environment Institute

EIPOT Final Project Report - Stockholm Environment Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ERA-NET SKEP <strong>Project</strong> <strong>EIPOT</strong> (www.eipot.eu)<br />

“Development of a methodology for the assessment of global environmental impacts of traded goods and services”<br />

Executive Summary<br />

In 2008, the SKEP (Scientific Knowledge for <strong>Environment</strong>al Protection) network commissioned<br />

research to develop a suitable methodology to assess transnational environmental impacts through<br />

international trade, which led to the establishment of the <strong>EIPOT</strong> project (environmental impacts of<br />

trade). The project was carried out between April 2008 and May 2009 by a consortium of four<br />

European research institutions: <strong>Stockholm</strong> <strong>Environment</strong> <strong>Institute</strong> at the University of York (project<br />

coordinator), Sustainable Europe Research <strong>Institute</strong> in Vienna, Netherlands <strong>Environment</strong>al<br />

Assessment Agency in Bilthoven and Statistics Sweden in <strong>Stockholm</strong>. The project aimed to:<br />

• review and evaluate existing environmental accounting techniques that can be used to illustrate<br />

transnational impacts of traded goods and services;<br />

• specify the (theoretical) framework and criteria for environmental accounting methodologies to<br />

assess the environmental impacts of imported and exported goods and services;<br />

• identify the most suitable methodology and expand it into an accounting approach which can be<br />

used by all SKEP member states;<br />

• identify data requirements and possible data sources for the recommended method;<br />

• elaborate the roles of different regulatory authorities in providing the required data and advice on<br />

the practical implementation of the methodology.<br />

During the project, it became clear that a) given the variety of possible research and policy questions<br />

to be answered, it would not be appropriate to stipulate one single method but rather put forward a<br />

flexible range of compatible methods and b) as a consequence, the focus should be on the<br />

developments needed in data and organisational roles. The <strong>EIPOT</strong> project report will be of interest<br />

and use to the SKEP network, national ministries and agencies, national statistical offices (NSO), the<br />

European Commission (EC) and Eurostat as well as academia.<br />

In the <strong>EIPOT</strong> project, an evaluation approach called RACER was adapted for the purposes of the<br />

project. RACER is used by the European Commission Directorate General <strong>Environment</strong> to assess the<br />

suitability of methods and indicators for policy-oriented applications. On the basis of assessments<br />

carried out here, <strong>EIPOT</strong> makes recommendations for setting up a method able to fulfil the project's<br />

aim of assessing transnational environmental impacts of traded goods and products. The suggested<br />

way forward is a methodology incorporating elements of different tools which have proven to be<br />

successful, and identification of future needs in order to develop an effective and applicable tool,<br />

rather than focussing on one approach and its further development.<br />

The relevance and suitability of any methodology always depends on the particular research or policy<br />

question that needs to be answered. The report looked at five policy dimensions – economic,<br />

environmental pressure/impact, geography, time, and life cycle stage – in order to understand the<br />

specific requirements for the methodology. The primary focus of the <strong>EIPOT</strong> project was on trade flows<br />

between different economies and production sectors within them, rather than on individual traded<br />

products.<br />

2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!