23.05.2014 Views

PhD Thesis - Universität Augsburg

PhD Thesis - Universität Augsburg

PhD Thesis - Universität Augsburg

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

16 1. Models<br />

Basic Properties<br />

A complete solution of the one-band Hubbard model (1.21) is possible in the case of<br />

vanishing interactions, U = 0. The remaining kinetic energy operator (the tight-binding<br />

contribution) ˆT, is diagonal in momentum space (Bloch basis) and the model describes a<br />

free Fermi gas which is an ideal metal. The model is also easily solved in the so-called<br />

atomic limit t ij = 0, since U ˆD is diagonal in position space (Wannier basis). A lattice<br />

site can be occupied with zero, one, or two electrons. For N e L only singly occupied<br />

and empty sites are present in the ground state, while for N e > L only doubly and singly<br />

occupied sites are encountered. Excited states can be classified according to the number<br />

of doubly occupied sites. The ground- and all excited states are highly degenerate with<br />

respect to the spin and charge degrees of freedom since neither the position of empty or<br />

doubly occupied sites nor the position of singly occupied sites in the lattice has any influence<br />

on the energy spectrum. Since the lattice sites are completely isolated the system is an<br />

insulator.<br />

The tight-binding ˆT and on-site interaction U ˆD terms (1.21) do not commute.<br />

Therefore the Hubbard Hamiltonian can neither be diagonalized in the Bloch nor in<br />

Wannier basis. The physics of the one-band Hubbard model may be understood as arising<br />

from the competition between two contributions: the tight-binding contribution ˆT, that<br />

prefers to delocalize the electrons and the on-site interaction U ˆD, that favors localization.<br />

Depending on the relations between the magnitudes of the hopping matrix elements<br />

t ij in different spatial directions, due to the lattice structure, the effective motion of the<br />

electrons can be strongly anisotropic. If the hopping matrix elements in one direction are<br />

much larger than in all the others, so the electrons move mainly in this direction, the<br />

system is called a quasi one-dimensional (1D) system. Similarly, if the hopping matrix<br />

elements in two spatial directions dominate, it is called quasi two-dimensional (2D). Of<br />

course, all materials are three dimensional crystals, but with respect to the motion of the<br />

electrons their dimensionality is reduced, and their electronic properties may be modeled<br />

by Hubbard or related models on one- or two-dimensional lattices. Since in real 3D crystals<br />

the hopping matrix elements perpendicular to the 1D chains (2D planes) are never exactly<br />

zero, it is also an interesting question how this affects the 1D (2D) physics. The issue of<br />

this crossover in the dimensionality is a research topic of its own (see, e.g., Ref. [9] and<br />

references therein), and is not a subject of this thesis. The topic of this thesis is to study<br />

certain cases of the half-filled Hubbard model (partly with extensions, see below) in 1D.<br />

The Hubbard Hamiltonian (1.21) represents the simplest many-particle electron model<br />

that can be deduced from the generic electronic Hamiltonian (1.18) incorporating true electronic<br />

correlation effects beyond an effective one-particle description. Despite its apparent<br />

simplicity, no full consistent treatment of the Hubbard model is available in general. Ex-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!