23.05.2014 Views

PhD Thesis - Universität Augsburg

PhD Thesis - Universität Augsburg

PhD Thesis - Universität Augsburg

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

32 2. Density-Matrix Renormalization Group<br />

Here we only used the orthonormality of the site local basis {|s j 〉}.<br />

Equations (2.25) and (2.26) can be used to find a matrix representation of any local<br />

operator, that acts on some site j < i in the basis B(L, i).<br />

It remains to find a matrix representation of the product of two local operators ˆQ k and<br />

Ô j , acting on the different sites k and j (k < j), respectively, e in the basis B(L, l). For this<br />

we start with the L(k)-representation Q L(k) of ˆQ k (2.25) and using (2.26) iteratively obtain<br />

its L(j − 1)-representation. Then using (2.8) we write the product of Q L(j−1) and matrix<br />

representation of Ôj (O j ) in the basis B(L, j) and hence obtain the L(j)-representation of<br />

ˆQ k Ô j ( ˆQ k Ô j ) L(j)<br />

= 〈α<br />

α j|( ′ ˆQ k Ô j )|α ′<br />

j ,α j 〉<br />

j<br />

⎛<br />

⎞ ⎛<br />

⎞<br />

∑<br />

= ⎝〈α j−1|〈s ′ ′ j| A ∗ j(s ′ j) α ′ ⎠<br />

j−1 ,α ′ ( ˆQ k Ô j ) ⎝ ∑<br />

A<br />

j<br />

j (s j ) αj−1 ,α j<br />

|α j−1 〉|s j 〉 ⎠<br />

α ′ j−1 ,α′ j<br />

α j−1 ,α j<br />

⎛<br />

⎞<br />

⎛<br />

⎞<br />

= ⎝ ∑<br />

A ∗ j (s′ j ) ⎠<br />

α ′ Q L(j−1)<br />

j−1 ,α′ j α ′<br />

α ′ j−1 j−1O j ⎝ ∑<br />

A ,α s ′ j ,s j (s j ) αj−1<br />

⎠<br />

,α<br />

j<br />

j<br />

j−1 ,α′ j<br />

α j−1 ,α j<br />

∑<br />

= A ∗ j (s′ j ) α ′ A j−1 ,α′ j j (s j ) α j−1 ,α j<br />

Q L(j−1)<br />

α ′ j−1 j−1O j , (2.27a)<br />

,α s ′ j ,s j<br />

α ′ j−1 ,α j−1,s ′ j ,s j<br />

or in matrix notation<br />

( ˆQ k Ô j ) L(j) = ∑ s ′ j ,s j<br />

A † j (s′ j )QL(j−1) A j (s j ) O j s ′ j ,s j. (2.27b)<br />

Finally, once more using (2.26) iteratively, from (2.27) we obtain its L(l)-representation.<br />

This can be easily generalized for the product of more than two operators each acting on<br />

a different site, e.g.,<br />

Ô ν = Ô1 ν Ô2 ν · · ·Ôl ν . (2.28)<br />

O L(l) (2.24) is then constructed by summing up L(l)-representations Oν<br />

L(l) of Ô ν . Note<br />

that we can take the sum but not the product of operators in the same L(l)-representation;<br />

since B(L, l) is the basis of the block subspace and not the complete one,<br />

( ˆQÔ)L(l) α ′ l ,α l<br />

= 〈α ′ l |( ˆQÔ)|α l 〉 ≠ ∑ α ′′<br />

l<br />

〈α l ′ ′′<br />

| ˆQ|α l 〉〈α′′ l |Ô|α l 〉 = [OL(l) Q L(l) ] α ′<br />

l ,α l<br />

. (2.29)<br />

As mentioned at the beginning, typically most of Ôν j in Ôν are just identity operators Î,<br />

corresponding to identity matrices in the site-local basis. In case of fermionic operators, due<br />

to the anticommutation relations, one should take care about “-” signs where it is necessary.<br />

e For k = j we take the product in the local basis of the site k and obtain a new local operator.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!