23.05.2014 Views

PhD Thesis - Universität Augsburg

PhD Thesis - Universität Augsburg

PhD Thesis - Universität Augsburg

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

34 2. Density-Matrix Renormalization Group<br />

Figure 2.1: Sketch showing superblock consisting of the system and the environment<br />

blocks, and the system block constructed with a block L(l) and a site l.<br />

and the corresponding B i (s i ) matrices. Forthcoming sections will describe the construction<br />

and the optimization of all A l (s l ) and B i (s i ) for the entire system (l, i = 1, . . .,L).<br />

In the above outlined “growing” procedure the block size is increased iteratively, adding<br />

one site at every step, until the desired length L is reached. f Consequently, the block at<br />

some step becomes a part of another, bigger one at the following steps. To avoid strong<br />

boundary effects during this procedure, White proposed [255, 256] to embed the block,<br />

which we might call the system block, into another one called the environment block, and<br />

search for the reduced representation of it in the environment given by the superblock<br />

(system + environment block) state. g Later in the subsection we will see that embedding<br />

into the environment for avoiding strong boundary effects has a deeper meaning, but at<br />

this stage let us follow a historical development of this concept.<br />

Let us look into this matter more precisely. Assume that at some point we reached<br />

a block of length l with a state space of dimension a l spanned by a set of orthonormal<br />

vectors {|α l 〉}. Now one site is added to it resulting in a system block (S) which has a<br />

n S = a l · d l+1 dimensional Hilbert space H S with a basis {|α l 〉 ⊗ |s l+1 〉 ≡ |α l s l+1 〉} =: {|i〉}.<br />

To avoid strong boundary effects we embed the system block into an “environment” (E)<br />

consisting with remaining sites of the lattice. This is schematically depicted in Fig. 2.1.<br />

At this point and for the following discussion it is not important whether the environment<br />

contains all remaining sites or just a part of them. Let n E be the size and {|j〉}<br />

the complete orthonormal basis of the Hilbert space H E of the environment block. Now<br />

we wish to determine a procedure which finds a set of orthonormal system-block states<br />

{|α l+1 〉} that spans an m := a l+1 n S dimensional subspace H L(l+1) of H S and gives the<br />

f It is not necessary to have a fixed L from the beginning. It can be identified as the size of the system<br />

for which the convergence in some quantity was reached.<br />

g Sometimes the name system/environment block is missleading, because at the end we are interested in<br />

features of the entire system (superblock). It is less confusing just to use the names left and right blocks,<br />

but it still will be a good concept to give a name system to the block whose states are going to be optimized<br />

and the rest name as an environment.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!