Versar, Inc. - Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals

site meeting and you review what is being passed for J1K
work. I think you would be enlightened by a site visit.
Furthernlore the seismic 38 Versar is going to mod your
contract for $35,000. Considering this figure I am appalled
by the original proposal of$350,000 to complete th~ work.
JJKNersar did not have enough proofthat we objected to the
seismic 38 with the government. We (presumably
JJKNersar) coordinated the meeting between the A&E and
the Seismic engineer where the A&E and Seismic Engineer
determined what was needed. The seismic engineer (a sub to
a sub ofJJK) submitted supplemental information directly to
the A&E which bound JJKNersar to the work~ I have asked'
J1K for back up from the seismic engineer but have not
received proofthat we (JJKNersar) are in the right and not
required to add the additional seismic.
As f~r the re-hanging ofthe FCDs we tried to sell the
installation that was done. Ifthe installation had .. .looked
good (quality work) we may have been able to sell it even
though it was not according to the prints. Additionally Versar
asked JJK for code/engineering backup to support what was
installed...still waiting. Versar had an independent structural
engineer on site to verifY the installation was reasonable,
needless to say I asked him not to send me a repoli.
The Punch list that was done by the A&E the week ofJuly 27,
2007 is 29 pages long which is not indicative ofthe amount of
work remaining. Because about 7 pages applies to every room.
J1K has provided letters and schedules with dates of
completion and they all passed by with the blink ofan eye. It
is imperative that you address your continually slipping
schedule. Your contract ends August 31, 2007 ..Versar is
prepared to supplement your forces starting September 1,
2007 to help you meet your date.
(Ex. G-1 at 1) Before sending the letter, Mr. Stiles corrected inaccuracies in monetary
amounts and adjusted its tone (tr. 2/163-65; 4/142-44).
38