2009 Report - Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

More documents

Recommendations

Info

About 53.0 percent of queued capacity is from natural gas projects. Some of these queued generator interconnection requests are duplicative, since more than one point of injection into the system is being evaluated. Also, this additional capacity may be used to serve Pennsylvania customers or out-of-state customers. See Figure 3.5. Appendix A provides the status of generator interconnection requests located in Pennsylvania. Figure 3.5 PJM Queued Capacity in Pennsylvania Hydro 1.6% Methane 0.3% Oil 3.8% Biomass 0.5% Other 1.3% Diesel 0.0% Wind 20.7% Nuclear 10.9% Coal 7.5% Natural Gas 53.4% The generating capacity located in Pennsylvania totals 51,135 MW. 37 As stated earlier, the output of some of these facilities may serve loads outside of Pennsylvania. The state’s demand is about 30,000 MW. See Figure 3.6. Appendix B lists the existing power plants located in Pennsylvania. Figure 3.6 Existing Capacity in Pennsylvania Other 1.1% Nuclear 19.1% Hydro 4.4% Wind 0.5% Natural Gas 27.2% Oil 6.6% Waste Coal 3.0% Coal 38.1% 37 Electric Power Generation Association. Electric Power Outlook for Pennsylvania 2008-2013 67
Section 4 - Conclusions Conclusions Pennsylvania continues to benefit from a high level of electric service reliability. The Pennsylvania outlook reflects the regional assessment of RFC. RFC reports that there is sufficient generation, transmission and distribution capacity in Pennsylvania to meet the needs of electric consumers for the foreseeable future. RFC anticipates that its reserve margin target will be satisfied through 2012, provided that proposed generation projects will be completed in a timely manner and enhancements to the transmission network will be capable of reliably delivering those resources. Summer reserve margins in RFC range from a high of 20.6 percent in 2008, declining to 8.9 percent in 2017. In 2013, additional capacity resources will likely be needed to maintain adequate reserves. The 2008 PJM reserve margin for existing capacity resources was 26.2 percent. Reserve margins are expected to meet the 15 percent reserve margin target through 2013. The Commission continues to pursue demand-side management, energy efficiency and load management programs and technologies to address ways to encourage customers to reduce their demand. These efforts include the implementation of Alternative Energy Portfolio Standards and the Energy Efficiency and Conservation Program. In the long term, this initiative will improve overall energy efficiency, including energy markets and system reliability. Furthermore, the implementation of the Alternative Energy Portfolio Standards Act will serve as a catalyst for the development of alternative energy resources. Through demand side measures and overall improvements in energy efficiency, EDCs and all customer classes will benefit from this effort. * * * * * To summarize the relevant statistics in this report, aggregate Pennsylvania sales in 2008 totaled approximately 148.3 billion kilowatthours, a 0.5 percent decrease from that of 2007. Residential sales accounted for 34.6 percent of the total sales, followed by industrial (32 percent) and commercial (30.9 percent). Between 1993 and 2008, the state’s energy demand grew at an average annual rate of 1.5 percent. Residential sales grew at an annual rate of 1.8 percent, commercial at 2.5 percent and industrial at 0.5 percent. Average total sales growth from 2003 to 2008 was 1.4 percent. The current aggregate five-year projection of growth in energy demand is 1.2 percent. This includes a residential 68 Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Page 1 and 2:
ElectricPowerOutlook forPennsylvani
Page 4 and 5:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction Sect
Page 6 and 7:
onsite generation by eliminating ba
Page 8 and 9:
Appendix A - Status of Plant Additi
Page 10 and 11:
Section 1 - Introduction Purpose El
Page 12 and 13:
Figure 1.1 Source: http://www.nerc.
Page 14 and 15:
Regional Transmission Organizations
Page 16 and 17:
Figure 1.4 MISO Footprint Transmiss
Page 18 and 19:
lines in Washington and Greene coun
Page 20 and 21:
Figure 1.8 Susquehanna—Roseland 5
Page 22 and 23:
power from the wholesale market to
Page 24 and 25:
Table 1.2 AEPS Compliance Schedule
Page 26 and 27: Table 1.3 Consumption & Peak Demand
Page 28 and 29: commercial at 2 percent and industr
Page 30 and 31: Figure 2.3 Cooling Degree Days vs P
Page 32 and 33: Duquesne's summer peak load, occurr
Page 34 and 35: Table 2.4 Duquesne Light Company Ac
Page 36 and 37: Metropolitan Edison Company Metropo
Page 38 and 39: In 2008, Met-Ed purchased approxima
Page 40 and 41: Table 2.10 Metropolitan Edison Comp
Page 42 and 43: The actual average annual peak load
Page 44 and 45: Table 2.12 Pennsylvania Electric Co
Page 46 and 47: Pennsylvania Power Company Pennsylv
Page 48 and 49: For Calendar Year 2008, five electr
Page 50 and 51: Table 2.18 Pennsylvania Power Compa
Page 52 and 53: The actual average annual peak load
Page 54 and 55: Table 2.20 PPL Electric Utilities C
Page 56 and 57: PECO Energy Company PECO Energy Com
Page 58 and 59: peak day, electric generation suppl
Page 60 and 61: Table 2.26 PECO Energy Company Actu
Page 62 and 63: West Penn's 2008 summer peak load,
Page 64 and 65: Table 2.28 West Penn Power Company
Page 66 and 67: UGI Utilities, Inc. The Electric Di
Page 68 and 69: Section 3 - Regional Reliability Re
Page 70 and 71: processes to expedite the licensing
Page 72 and 73: Figure 3.1 RFC 2008-2017 Reserve Ma
Page 74 and 75: The planned 130-mile, 500 kV circui
Page 78 and 79: growth rate of 1.0 percent, a comme
Page 80 and 81: Status of Pennsylvania's Plant Addi
Page 82 and 83: Status of Pennsylvania's Plant Addi
Page 84 and 85: Pennsylvania's Existing Electric Ge
Page 86: Pennsylvania's Existing Electric Ge
show all

2009 Report - Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?