04.06.2014 Views

Download this publication - PULP

Download this publication - PULP

Download this publication - PULP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

EAST AFRICAN COURT OF JUSTICE<br />

Katabazi and Others v Secretary-General of the<br />

East African Community and Another<br />

(2007) AHRLR 119 (EAC 2007)<br />

James Katamazi and 21 Others v Secretary-General of the East<br />

African Community and the Attorney-General of the Republic of<br />

Uganda<br />

East African Court of Justice at Arusha, reference 1 of 2007, 1<br />

November 2007<br />

Judges: Keiwua, Mulenga, Ramadhani, Arach-Amoko, Nsekela<br />

Whether the invasion of a Ugandan High Court by armed<br />

government agents, the re-arrest of the complainants granted<br />

bail by the High Court and their incarceration in prison constitute<br />

infringement of the EAC Treaty<br />

Jurisdiction (res judicata, 30-32; human rights, 33-39)<br />

Rule of law (separation of powers, 45, 53, 54)<br />

Fair trial (independence of courts, 47-54)<br />

Remedies (responsibility of EAC Secretary-General, 59-62)<br />

[1.] This is a reference by sixteen persons against the Secretary-<br />

General of the East African Community as the 1st respondent and the<br />

Attorney-General of Uganda as the 2nd respondent.<br />

[2.] The story of the claimants is that: during the last quarter of<br />

2004 they were charged with treason and misprision of treason and<br />

consequently they were remanded in custody. However, on 16<br />

November 2006, the High Court granted bail to fourteen of them.<br />

Immediately thereafter the High Court was surrounded by security<br />

personnel who interfered with the preparation of bail documents and<br />

the fourteen were re-arrested and taken back to jail.<br />

[3.] On 24 November 2006 all the claimants were taken before a<br />

military General Court Martial and were charged with offences of<br />

unlawful possession of firearms and terrorism. Both offences were<br />

based on the same facts as the previous charges for which they had<br />

been granted bail by the High Court. All claimants were again<br />

remanded in prison by the General Court Martial.<br />

119

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!