detailed project report - Commissionerate of Rural Development ...

BHAVNAGAR 

DETAILED PROJECT REPORT :IWMP - 6

DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (DPR) DWDU – Bhavnagar 

Contents 

Table no.1: Basic project information .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 6 

Table no.2: Weightage of the project .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 

Table no.3: Watershed information ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 9 

Table no.4: Developmental programmes running in the project area: .................................................................................................................................................................................. 9 

Table no. 5: Previous Watershed programmes in the project area: ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 10 

Table no. 6: PIA: .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 11 

Table no. 7: Staff at PIA level: ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 12 

Table no. 8: Land use pattern: ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 13 

Table no. 9: Soil type and topography: .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 13 

Table no. 10: Flood and drought condition: .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 14 

Table no. 11.1: Soil Erosion ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. 

Table no. 11.2: Soil Salinity/Alkalinity (Salinity ingress) .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 14 

Table no. 11.3: Waterlogging Conditions.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 15 

Table no. 12: Climatic conditions:........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 15 

Table no. 13: Physiography and relief .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 

Table no. 14: Land ownership details ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 16 

Table no. 15: Agriculture ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 17


Table no. 16: Irrigation............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 18 

Table no. 17: Crop details: ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 19 

Table no. 18: Livestock ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 22 

Table no. 19: Drinking water ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 22 

Table no. 20: Details of Common Property Resources ................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 23 

Table no. 21: Demographic information ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 24 

Table no. 22: Literacy rate ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 24 

Table no. 23: Migration details ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 25 

Table no. 24: Poverty ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 25 

Table no. 25: Village infrastructure .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 26 

Table no. 26 : Facilities / HH assets .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 27 

Table no. 27: Income ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 27 

Table no.28: Dependence on Forest/CPR ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 28 

Table no. 29: Livelihood pattern (Occupational distribution) ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 28 

Table no. 30: Details of Scientific Planning and Inputs in IWMP projects* ........................................................................................................................................................................ 28 

Table no. 31: Watershed Committee details ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 33 

Table no. 32: SHG detail ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 39 

Table no. 33: UG detail .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 42 

Table no.34: Entry point activities (EPA) (All financial figures in lakh Rs.) ...................................................................................................................................................................... 44


Table no.35: Details of activities of preparatory phase (All financial figures in lakh Rs.) ............................................................................. Error! Bookmark not defined. 

Table no.36: Activities related to Surface water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.) ............................................................................................ 46 

Table no.37: Activities related to recharging ground water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.) ........ Error! Bookmark not defined. 

Table no. 38: Activities related to livelihoods by Self Help Groups (SHGs) in the project areas .................................................................. Error! Bookmark not defined. 

Table no. 39: Other activities of watershed works phase – Proposed target ....................................................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. 

Table no.40: Details of engineering structures in watershed works* .................................................................................................................................................................................. 49 

Table no.41: Details of activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works ............................................................................................................................................. 54 

Table no.42: Details of allied / other activities ................................................................................................................................................................. Error! Bookmark not defined. 

Table no.43: Details of activities in the CPRs in the project areas ............................................................................................................................ Error! Bookmark not defined. 

Table no. 44: Capacity Building Institution: ....................................................................................................................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. 

Table no. 45: Capacity Building plan: .................................................................................................................................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. 

Table no.46: Information, education and Communication Activities: .................................................................................................................................................................................. 68 

Table no. 47: Village wise- activity wise budget ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 69 

Table no. 48: Budget at a glance ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 69 

Table no.49: Details of Convergence of IWMP with other Schemes ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 71 

Table no. 50: Public-Private Partnership in the IWMP projects* ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 74 

Table no. 51: Employment in Project area: ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 75 

Table no. 52: Details of seasonal migration from Project area ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 75 

Table no. 53: Details of average ground water table depth in the project areas (in meters) ..................................................................................................................................... 76


Table no. 54: Status of Drinking water* ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 77 

Table no. 55: Details of Kharif crop area and yield in the project areas .............................................................................................................................................................................. 78 

Table no. 56: Area under horticulture ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 78 

Table no. 57: Forest/vegetative cover .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 79 

Table no. 58: Details of livestock in the project areas * (for fluids please mention in litres, for solids please mention in kgs. and income in Rs.) ............................ 79 

Table no. 59: Backward-Forward linkages ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 80


Table no.1: Basic project information 

The project is situated in Umarala taluka of Bhavnagar district. The project comprises five Gram Panchayats viz. Dedakadi, Devaliya, Langala, 

Limbada & Ranghola. Total geographical area of the cluster is 5812.6 Ha & Project area is 5312.6 Ha. Total project cost is Rs 637.12 Lacs. The biggest village 

is Limbada, so project cluster is identified with its name. Total geographical area of the cluster is 5812.6 total area proposed to be treated is 5312.6 Ha. 

All 5 villages are well connected with pucca road. Patel, Koli & Harijan are main communities in the villages. The people of this village are primarily 

based on rainfed agriculture, wage labour and animal husbandry. The cluster is comprises 4 micro watershed viz. 5G2C4d1b, 5G2C4d1a, 5G2C4d2d, 

5G2C4c3m. DWDU Bhavnagar has been appointed as Project implementation Agency. One large dam is situated on upstream of Rangholi river near project 

area. 

Table no. 1: Area proposed to be treated 

Villages 

Area Total 

Sl Name of the 

Gram 

Area of the 

Taluka District 

proposed to project PIA 

No. project Name Census code Panchayats 

project 

be treated cost 

1 

Limbada 140040099980000 Limbada 

Umrala 

2233.20 1733.20 146.81 

2 Ranghola 140040099980000 Ranghola 

Umrala 1223.4 1223.4 207.98 

3 

IWMP – 6 

Langala 

140040099010000 

Langala 

Umrala 

Bhavnagar 

1094.4 1094.4 

131.33 

D.W.D.U 

4 Devaliya 140040099000000 Devaliya 

Umrala 

820.0 820.00 

98.40 

5 Dedakadi 

140040098900000 

Dedakadi 

Umrala 

441.60 441.6 

52.99 

Total 5812.60 5312.6 

637.51


Prioritization of the Project 

Prioritization of micro watershed has been done by considering socioeconomic as well as physical parameters. Based on 13 parameters priority map 

has been prepared by BISAG, which provides technical support for watershed project of Gujarat state. Watershed Development Program is prioritized on the 

basis of thirteen parameters namely Poverty Index, Percentage of SC/ST, Actual wages, Percentage of small and marginal farmers, Ground water status, 

Moisture Index, Area under rainfed agriculture, Drinking water situation in the area, Percentage of the degraded land, Productivity potential of the land, 

Continuity of another watershed that has already developed/treated, Cluster approach for plain or for hilly terrain. Based on these thirteen parameters a 

composite ranking was given to Limbada Watershed project as given in table no. 2. Cluster approach was followed taking into consideration four microwatersheds 

covering a total area of 5312.6 Ha. Thus a cumulative score of 93.5 

# Criteria and weightage for selection of watershed 

S. 

Maximum 

Criteria 

No. 

score 

Ranges & scores 

i Poverty index (% of poor to 

population) 

10 Above 80 % (10) 80 to 50 % (7.5) 50 to 20 % (5) Below 20 % 

(2.5) 

ii % of SC/ ST population 10 More than 40 % (10) 20 to 40 % (5) Less than 20 % (3) 

iii Actual wages 5 Actual wages are 

significantly lower than 

minimum wages (5) 

Actual wages are equal to 

or higher than minimum 

wages (0) 

iv % of small and marginal 

10 More than 80 % (10) 50 to 80 % (5) Less than 50 % (3) 

farmers 

v Ground water status 5 Over exploited (5) Critical (3) Sub critical (2) Safe (0) 

vi Moisture index/ 

DPAP/ DDP Block 

15 -66.7 & below (15) 

DDP Block 

-33.3 to -66.6 (10) 

DPAP Block 

0 to -33.2 (0) 

Non DPAP/ DDP Block 

vii Area under rain-fed 

agriculture 

15 More than 90 % (15) 80 to 90 % (10) 70 to 80% (5) Above 70 % 

(Reject) 

viii Drinking water 10 No source (10) Problematic village (7.5) Partially covered (5) Fully 

covered (0) 

ix Degraded land 15 High – above 20 % (15) Medium – 10 to 20 % 

(10) 

Low- less than 10 % of 

TGA (5) 

x Productivity potential of the 15 Lands with low production & Lands with moderate Lands with high


xi 

xii 

xiii 

land 

Contiguity to another 

watershed that has already 

been developed/ treated 

Cluster approach in the 

plains (more than one 

contiguous microwatersheds 

in the project) 

Cluster approach in the hills 

(more than one contiguous 

micro-watersheds in the 

project) 

where productivity can be 

significantly enhanced with 

reasonable efforts (15) 

10 Contiguous to previously 

treated watershed & 

contiguity within the 

microwatersheds in the 

project (10) 

15 Above 6 micro-watersheds 

in cluster (15) 

15 Above 5 micro-watersheds 


production & where 

productivity can be 

enhanced with 

reasonable efforts (10) 

Contiguity within the 


project but non 

contiguous to previously 

treated watershed (5) 

4 to 6 microwatersheds 




production & where 

productivity can be 

marginally enhanced 

with reasonable efforts 

(5) 

Neither contiguous to 

previously treated 

watershed nor 

contiguity within the 


project (0) 





Total 150 150 90 41 2.5 

Project 

name 

IWMP – 

6 

Project 

type 

Other 

Table no.2: Weightage of the project 

Weightage 

I Ii Iii Iv V Vi Vii Viii Ix X Xi xii Xiii Total 

7.5 5 5 5 3 15 5 5 5 5 15 15 0 93.5


Project type: Hilly/desert/Other 

Table no.3: Watershed information 

Name of the project No. Of watersheds to be treated Watershed code Watershed regime/type/order 

IWMP 6 4 5G2C2d1, 5G2C2d2, 5G2C4d2d,5G2c3m1 micro watershed 

Other Rural Development Program: 

The village has been benefited by various schemes of rural development. Currently MGNREGA &TSC is running in the village. This is the first 

watershed project in four out of five Villages. 

i. MGNREGA: (MNREGA) is an Indian job guarantee scheme, enacted by legislation on August 25, 2005. The scheme provides a legal guarantee for one 

hundred days of employment in every financial year to adult members of any rural household willing to do public work-related unskilled manual work at the 

statutory minimum wage of Rs.100 per day. Construction of bori bhandhs & Desilting of village ponds, Afforestation etc activities have been taken-up under 

MGNREGA. 

ii. Total Sanitation Campaign (TSC): Total Sanitation Campaign is a comprehensive programme to ensure sanitation facilities in rural areas. Individual 

toilets are constructed under TSC programme. 

iii. Awas Yojana: House for BPL had been constructed under Indira Avas Yojana (IAY) & Saradar Avas Yojana(SAY) 

IV. Swajal Dhara: facilitating organization working towards drinking water security and habitat improvement by empowering communities to manage 

their local water sources, drinking water supply and environmental sanitation. Roof water Harvesting Structure with ground water tank has been 

constructed.


Table no.4: Developmental programmes running in the project area: 

Estimated 

Sr 

Name of the 

Sponsoring 

Objectives of the 

Villages 

Year of commencement 

number of 

no programme/scheme 

agency 

programme/scheme 

covered 

beneficiaries 

1 Saradar Avas Rural Dev. Dept. Housing 2001/2002 3 10 

2 M N R E G A Rural Dev. Dept. Employment 2009 5 1000 

3 Indira Avas Rural Dev. Dept. Housing 2001 /2002 4 18 

4 T S C Rural Dev. Dept. Construct Toilet 2009 /2010 4 13 

5 Swajal dhara WASMO 

Drinking Water 

2008/2009 4 10,000 

Pre IWMP project in Project Area 

Integrated waste land development program is in implementation phase in Limbada village out of total 5 villages. No other village has been benefited 

by watershed project till now. Only 500 ha out of total area of Limbada village was planned to be treated. Till now 

Table no. 5: Previous Watershed programmes in the project area 

Sl 

no 

Project 

name 

Year 

started 

Name of 

villages 

No. Of 

micro 

watershed 

Waters 

hed 

codes 

Area 

under 

treatment 

Funding 

source 

Nodal 

agenc 

y 

PIA 

Total 

cost 

Expenditure 

incurred up to 

start of IWMP 

% financial 

completion 

% physical 

completion 

1 

IWDP - 

6 

2009- 

10 

Limbada 1 

5G2C4d 

1b 

500 

GOI/GO 

G 

DWD 

U 

Taluka 

panchayat 

30.0 

0 

11.50 38.3 38


Project Implementing Agency 

Project Implementing Agency (PIA) is being selected by an appropriate mechanism by State Level Nodal Agency (SLNA). PIAs would be responsible 

for implementation of watershed project. These PIAs may include relevant line departments, autonomous organizations under State/Central Governments, 

Government Institutes/Research Bodies, Intermediates Panchayats, voluntary Organizations (VOs). The PIA of IWMP - 6 watershed project is District 

Watershed Development Unit, Bhavnagar. 

District Watershed Development Unit (DWDU) 

The organization and its objectives: 

The District Watershed Development Unit (DWDU), Bhavnagar is a district level nodal agency and was established where area is more than 25000Ha 

for the smooth implementation of watershed projects in the district. The District Development Officer (DDO) is the chairman of the DWDU. The DWDU have 

dedicated and experience staffs compromising one Project Manager (deputation from Gujarat Forest Department) a Technical Expert (on contract basis) and 

Multidisciplinary team of Agriculture Expert, Community Mobilization Expert, Civil Engineer, Computer Operator, Surveyor and Accountant are recruited. 

The objective of DWDU are supervising, planning, implementing, documenting and promoting watershed development projects and related development 

activities in the district, also DWDU will work as PIA for IWMP projects. 

Table no. 6: PIA: 

Sl. No. Names of project Details of PIA 

(i) Type of organization District Level Nodal Agency 

(ii) Name of organization D. W D. U. Bhavnagar 

LIMADA -6 

(iii) Designation & Address NEAR Income Tax Office. MOTIBAG, BHAVNGAR. 

(iv) Telephone 02782423657 , 02782515496 

(v) Fax 02782427535


(vi) E-mail bvndwdu@gmail.com 

Each PIA has put in position a dedicated watershed development team (WDT) with the approval of DWDU. The WDTs are hired on 

contract for 11 months. The composition of the WDT will be indicated in the contract/ MOU. No program funds for DPR and watershed works 

under any circumstances should be released to either the PIA or Watershed Committee (WC) unless the composition of the WDT has been 

clearly indicated in the MOU/ contract and the team members are fully in place. Three WDTs viz. agriculture, Civil Engineering & social 

mobilization - institutional building experts have been recruited. For assistance in office work Accountant, data entry operator, surveyor & 

messenger have been recruited. 

Table no. 7: Staff at PIA level: 

Sl 

Monthly 

Name Age Sex Designation Qualification Experience Job assigned 

no 

remuneration 

1 Mr. M. R. Gujjar 45 M Project Manager GFS 22 Project management 50,000 

2 Alpesh Nandanwar 25 M Technical Expert MBA 2 Technical Support 25,000 

2 Jashvant Bendkar 35 M Nodal Officer BRS 7 Execution 13,000 

3 Nisha Pandit 9 F W.D.T [Co.Mobi] B. Sc [Home Sc.] 6 

Community 

Mobilization 

10,000 

4 Dabhi Vijaykumar 26 M W.D.T[Agri] B.R.S., B.Ed. 6 Agricultural support 10,000 

5 Gohil Harpalshih 28 M Accountant B.Com 6 Accounting 9,000 

6 Rajyaguru Atulbhai 30 M Surveyor S.S.C.[ITI] 6 Surveying 7,000 

7 Vinod Baraiya 25 M Data Entry Operator B.A . [O.LEVEL] 5 Data Entry 5,000


8 Rathod Raghav 28 M Messenger B.A [B. Ed] 3 Office routine work 3,000 

Umrala Taluka Comes under IWDP block in Bhavnagar district. IWDP – 4 is running in 10 villages Bhavnagar. The cluster has 5 villages however it has very 

less forest Area. The cluster does not enjoy assured irrigation facility. However Waste Land in the project area is very high. 

Table no. 8: Land use pattern 

S. No. 

Names of Geographical Area of 

Land under 

Perm-anent 

Wasteland 

Forest Area 

Rainfed area 

villages 

the village 

agricultural use 

pastures Cultivable Non-cultivable 

1 Limbada 1733.20 6 HA 1667 1667 60 HA 6 HA 

2 Ranghola 1223.40 NIL 968 712 712 214 42.5 

3 Langala 1094.40 1.76 900.5 700.94 90.77 1.76 - 

4 Devaliya 593 8 HA 593 820 820 102.2 124.5 

5 Dedakadi 441.60 - 288.8 205 21 75 63.1 

Table no. 9: Soil type and topography 

As Bhavnagar district is a part of Saurashtra region, the major type of soil is Vertisols. It may form residually from weathered limestone or basalt. These soils are 

generally developed from parent materials that are rich in alkaline earth cations (Ca and Mg). The weathering of these rocks produces black cotton soil type clay. Normally 

Waste lands the soils where weathering is not completed. 

S. No. 

Name of the Agro-climatic 

zone covers project area 

Area in 

ha 

Names of the 

villages 

a)Type 

Major soil types 

b) Area in ha 

Topography 

1 South - East Saurashtra 5312.6 Limbada Shallow Black, Sandy Loam 1533.20 Plain & Hilly


# Flat, undulating, moderate slope, Steep slope 

& Red Basaltic soil 

Ranghola Medium Black Soil 968.00 Plain & undulating 

Langala Shallow Black Soil 1094.40 Plain 

Devaliya Shallow Medium Black Soil 593.0 Plain 

Dedakadi Deep Medium black, 441.600 Plain & Undulating 

Table no. 10: Flood and drought condition: 

Sr no Village Flood (Incidence) Drought (Incidence) 

1 Limbada once in Every 10 year once in Three Year 

2 Ranghola once in Every 10 year once in Three Year 

3 Langala once in Every 10 year once in Three Year 

4 Devaliya once in Every 10 year once in Three Year 

5 Dedakadi once in Every 10 year once in Three Year 

Soil sample collected from field for soil analysis. Sampling is done by scientific technique. Soil pH is a measure of the soil acidity or soil alkalinity. An 

acid solution has a pH value less than 7. While a basic solution always has a pH larger than 7, an alkaline solution (i.e., a solution with positive acid 

neutralizing capacity), can also be defined as the negative logarithm of hydroxide ions in the soil. It therefore does not necessarily have a pH larger than 7. In 

the project area soil ph ranges from 7.5 to 8.5 which indicate alkalinity of soil. However soil ph is below 8.5 in every sample soil 

Table no. 11.2: Soil Salinity/Alkalinity (Salinity ingress) 

Type of Salinity 

Name of the Village Survey Number Soil pH 

(Inherent/Ingress)


Limbada 298P2 /299P3 7.5 TO 8.5 Neutral 

Ranghola 13,169,145,31/2, 106p3 7.5 TO 8.5 Neutral 

Langala 158,129/1, 11/3,14/4,146/1,58 7.5 TO 8.5 Neutral 

Devaliya 93, 94/1, 94/2, 190/1, 7.5 TO 8.5 Neutral 

Dedakadi 91,93, ,105/2,54 7.5 TO 8.5 Neutral 

Table no. 11.3: Water logging Conditions 

Name of the Village Survey Number Reasons 

Limbada Nil - 

Ranghola 82p2 ,91p2 ,129p3 ,162p3,86p3 Poorly drain (Only in Monsoon) 

Langala - - 

Devaliya - - 

Dedakadi 

91,93,90,89,80/1,85/2,104/1,105/2,106/3, 

102/1/2/3,25,68/1 

Poor drainage (Only in Monsoon) 

Umarala Taluka of Bhavnagar district receives annual rainfall of 650 mm in 35 rainy days with high coefficient of variation. High coefficient of 

variation reflects anomalies in annual rainfall in Umarala taluka. Normally people are facing drought every three year. 

Table no. 12: Climatic conditions: 

Year 

Rain fall 

Average temperature 

Max 

Min 

41.7 14.4


2005 

2006 

2007 

2008 

2009 

842 

582 

1141 

712 

448 

42.0 15.0 

41.9 14.0 

42.5 15.2 

42.1 15.7 

Table no. 13: Physiography and relief 

Though mainly the cluster area having slop ranges from 0-1 % some part of Limbada village is having higher slope. Waste land of around 400 ha has slope 

range 

Project name Elevation Slope range (%) Major streams 

from 1 -3 

I.W.MP.6 50 m 1 TO 5% Rangholi, Gadhuli 

%.


In the cluster villages have General category people have more land compare to OBC & SC, As the villages have a few ST population, they do not 

owned land in the project area. However on observation find that average land holding is comparatively low 

Table no. 14: Land ownership details 

Sl no 

Village 

Total owned land 

HHs giving land HHs taking 

Gen OBC SC ST 

on lease land on lease 

1 Limbada 481 50 25 N 132 100 

2 Ranghola 155 367 10 N 70 123 

3 Langala 90 300 10 N 100 100 

4 Devaliya 799 17.00 4.00 N 10 10 

5 Dedakadi 209 87 15 90% 10% 

Table no. 15: Agriculture 

Sl no Village Net sown area 

One time Two times Three times 

1 Limbada 1667.0 320.30 - 

2 Ranghola 968.00 289.00 - 

3 Langala 900.5 234.10 - 

4 Devaliya 593.00 127.20 - 

5 Dedakadi 288.8 91.00 -


Table no. 16: Irrigation 

Source 1 : Canal Source 2 : Check dam / Pond Source 3 : Well 

Sl 

Village Availability 

Availability 

Availability 

Gross 

no 

Net area Gross area 

Net area Gross area 

Net area 

months 

months 

months 

area 

1 Limbada - - - - - - 2 323 323 

2 Ranghola 3 480ha - 2 280 - 3 150 ha - 

3 Langala 2 200ha - - - - 4 150 ha - 

4 Devaliya 2 410ha - - - - 3 150 ha - 

5 Dedakadi 2 55 55.00 - - - 7 36 36.00


Cotton, Ground nut, Bajara, Tal and Sorghum are 5 main Kharif Crops grown over an area of 567154 Ha. Cotton is the main crop covering 55 % of 

area under Kharif crop as shown in pie chart 1. Wheat, Cumin and Onion are 3 main Rabi crops grown over an area of 63219 Ha. Out of this area, wheat 

covered 52410 (83 %) as shown in pie chart 2 

Area under Kharif Crop 

Area under Rabi Crop


Table no. 17: Crop details: 

Sr no Village Kharif (Monsoon) 

1 Crop 1 Cotton Crop 2 Ground Nut Crop 3 Millet 

Area 

Production 

Ton 

Productivity 

Ton 

Area Production Productivity Area Production Productivity 

7740[Ton] 

1 Limbada 1327.0 2388.6 1.80 214.00 513.60 2.4 28 64.40 2.3 

2 Ranghola 765.30 1377.54 1.80 165.20 396.48 2.4 17 39.10 2.3 

3 Langala 795.80 1432.44 1.80 127.50 306.00 2.4 13 29.90 2.3 

4 Devaliya 485.00 921.50 1.90 87.40 209.76 2.4 11 25.30 2.3 

5 Dedakadi 232.00 417.60 1.80 35.00 84.00 2.4 10 23.00 2.3 

Sl 

no 

Village 

Rabi (Winter) 

Crop 1 Wheat Crop 2 Millet Crop 3 

Area Production Productivity Area Production Productivity Area Production Productivity 

1 Limbada 210 756 3.6 56 140 2.5 - - - 

2 Ranghola 175 630 3.6 40 96 2.4 

3 Langala 120 432 3.6 51 127.50 2.5 

4 Devaliya 70 252 3.6 32 80 2.5 

5 Dedakadi 45 162 3.6 16 40 2.5


As the area does not enjoy assured irrigation facility, Rabi crop can’t be grown in whole agricultural land. Other than agricultural food crops farmers 

use to grow animal fodder in some part out of total land. As water shortage is a big issue no crop can be taken in summer. Overall only one or two crops are 

taken in year. As no Irrigation facility is available no one grow anything in summer. 

Sr. 

no 

Village 

Zaid (Summer) 

Crop 1 Crop 2 Crop 3 

Area Production Productivity Area Production Productivity Area Production Productivity 

1 Limbada 

2 Ranghola 

3 Langala N I L 

4 Devaliya 

5 Dedakadi


The table below reveals that though Limbada is the biggest village in the cluster, animal population is the highest Ranghola. The cluster has good 

opportunity in animal husbandry. As no Milk co operative is working till now, it can be linked with the newly opened dairy in Sihor. This will give them a good source 

of income as village people of Anand & other north Gujarat district are getting. 

Sl 

no 

Village Buffalo Cow 

Table no. 18: Livestock 

Total Milk 

(Buffalo Cow 

/Year) 

No milk No Milk No Milk 

Goat Sheep Bullock Hen Others 

1 Limbada 92 6 215 4 1412 212 1 80 477 10 - 

2 Ranghola 572 6 478 4 5344 389 1 355 412 - - 

3 Langala 200 5 320 6 2920 300 1 - 50 - - 

4 Devaliya 100 06 400 4 2200 160 1 140 70 05 - 

5 Dedakadi 65 6 57 4 618 125 125 0 26 0 0 

The people are getting drinking water from Mahi Pariel Yojana. However the quantity of water is very less. But few people have made Rain roof 

water Harvesting Structure by indigenous design which has good quality but quantity is not sufficient for the whole the year. 

Table no. 19: Drinking water 

Sr no Village Ground water table (mt) Source of drinking water Availability in months Quality 

1 Limbada 40-45 Water Tank 6 High TDS 

2 Ranghola 35-40 

Water tap, Hand Pump & Bore 

well 

8 High TDS 

3 Langala 35-40 Hand Pump 7-8 High TDS


4 Devaliya 30-35 Water Tank 8-10 High TDS 

5 Dedakadi 30-35 Water Tap, Water tank 6-8 High TDS 

S. 

No. 

1 

Names of 

project 

IWMP- 6 

Table no. 20: Details of Common Property Resources 

Total Area (ha) 

Area available for treatment (ha) 

Area owned/ In possession of 

CPR 

Govt. 

Govt. 

Particulars 

Any other Pvt. 

Any other 

Pvt. Persons (Specify PRI 

(Specify PRI 

(Pl. Specify) persons 

(Pl. Specify) 

deptt.) 

deptt.) 

Wasteland/ degraded land 327.00 327.00 - 

Pastures 397.00 397.00 

Forest - 42.00 - - - 0.00 42.00 - 

Village Ponds/ Tanks 23.50 23.50 - 

Community Buildings - - - - - - - - 

Temples/ Places of worship - 2.00 - - 2.00 - 

Others (Pl. specify) - - - - - - - - 

Total 42.00 749.5 0.00 791.5


Table no. 21: Demographic information 

Dedakadi is the smallest village in terms of population & Limbada is the biggest one. As shown below total population around 17K. We have seen 

good unity in the village people. Only Limbada village is having ST population among the five villages. However all the villages have considerable percent of 

SC population. Majority of population is associated agriculture and Animal Husbandry. 

Sl 

no 

Village Population SC ST 

Total Male Female Total Male Female % Total Male Female % 

1 Limbada 4750 2423 2327 200 120 80 4 % 200 130 70 4 % 

2 Ranghola 6949 3861 3088 1100 600 500 11 % - - - - 

3 Langala 3468 1761 1707 3468 350 420 30% - - - - 

4 Devaliya 1177 607 500 70 42 28 7% - - - - 

5 Dedakadi 903 461 442 233 133 100 22 - - - - 

17247 9113 8064 5071 1245 1128 

Table no. 22: Literacy rate 

Sl no 

Village 

Literacy 

Literacy % above Literacy % below 

Total % Male % Female % 

age 14 

age 14 

1 Limbada 4000 70 % 1703 67 % 1507 62 % 57 % 85 % 

2 Ranghola 3000 67 % 1700 58 % 1300 48 % 57 % 85 % 

3 Langala 3840 60% 2000 40% 1840 39% 60 % 70 % 

4 Devaliya 580 70% 280 48% 300 30% 52 % 80 %


5 Dedakadi 740 82 405 89 335 76 74 93 

TOTAL 12160 6088 5282 

Table no. 23: Migration details 

Migration 

Migration by months 

Income 

Total 

Main reason for during 

Sl no Village 

Up to 3 

More than 6 

population Total Male Female 

3-6 months 

migration migration / 

months 

months 

month 

1 Limbada 1100 1100 620 480 - - - Low income 5000 

2 Ranghola 1000 1000 550 450 - - - Low income 5000 

3 Langala 250 250 150 100 - - - Low income 5000 

4 Devaliya 500 500 260 240 - - - Low income 5000 

5 Dedakadi 903 150 100 50 - - 150 Low income 5000 

Total 3753 3000 1680 1320 150 

Table no. 24: Poverty 

Sr no Village Total Household 

BPL 

0-16 16-20 Total 

% of BPL HH Total Land less HH % of land less HH 

1 Limbada 882 13 76 89 10% 562 35% 

2 Ranghola 300 83 273 300 10% 562 53 %


3 Langala 650 19 286 305 50% 35 5% 

4 Devaliya 300 9 150 159 10% 50 5% 

5 Dedakadi 219 23 21 44 21 90 40 

Total 2351 897 1299 

Table no. 25: Village infrastructure 

Pucca 

Schools 

Distance 

Milk 

Other 

road to 

from 

Milk 

Sl 

Colleges Post Office Banks 

collection 

cooperatives Any other 

Village the 

nearest 

cooperative 

no 

LP UP HS (Number) (Distance) (Number) 

centre 

/ CBIs institution 

village 

market 

(Number) 

(Number) 

(Number) 

(Y/N) 

yard 

1 Limbada Y Y Y Y 0 2 km 0 13 km 1 1 0 0 

2 Ranghola Y Y y Y 0 0 0 6 km 1 1 1 0 

3 Langala Y Y Y N 0 0 0 5km 0 1 0 0 

4 Devaliya Y Y Y N 0 4 km 0 2km 1 0 0 0 

5 Dedakadi Y Y Y N 0 3 km 0 4 km 0 1 0 0


Table no. 26: Facilities / HH assets 

HHs with HHs with phones 

HHs with vehicle 

HHs with HHs with HHs 

Sl 

HHs with 

HHs with 

Village 

safety 

cooking Drinking with 

no 

electricity 

Land line Mobile 2-wheeler 4-wheeler TV set 

latrines 

gas water freedge 

1 Limbada 802 214 95 387 147 6 208 125 154 27 

2 Ranghola 1094 213 78 421 204 6 213 136 122 29 

3 Langala 600 91 24 121 120 3 87 49 123 10 

4 Devaliya 180 167 15 134 180 4 109 56 134 12 

5 Dedakadi 175 75 25 108 87 3 95 27 80 - 

TOTAL 2851 760 237 1171 738 22 712 393 613 78 

Table no. 27: Income 

Sl no Village Agriculture Animal husbandry Casual labour Others Total 

1 Limbada 34900000 2200000 3500000 400000 41000000 

2 Ranghola 27120000 5300000 3450000 350000 36220000 

3 Langala 14400000 3649000 2860000 410000 21016000 

4 Devaliya 7350000 2300000 1000000 250000 1090000 

5 Dedakadi 19,00,000 507000 6,00,000 3,00,000 3307000


Table no.28: Dependence on Forest/CPR 

Sl no 

Village 

Benefit type 1 Woodlot Benefit type 2 Animal fodder Benefit type 3 Others 

% sells Income % sells Income % sells Income 

Total income 

1 Limbada 200000 300000 0.00 500000 

2 Ranghola - 120000 110000 0.00 - 230000 

3 Langala 165000 135000 0.00 300000 

4 Devaliya - 85000 100000 0.00 - 185000 

5 Dedakadi 100000 30000 0.00 103000 

Table no. 29: Livelihood pattern (Occupational distribution) 

Animal 

Sl 

Total 

Agriculture + Casual 

Village 

Agriculture husbandry 

no 

workforce 

AH 

labour 

(AH) 

Services Handicraft Others 

1 Limbada 842 556 100 320 312 16 35 ------- 

2 Ranghola 1094 532 260 100 107 80 15 ------- 

3 Langala 650 400 50 450 170 15 70 170 

4 Devaliya 250 150 20 30 42 8 10 ------- 

5 Dedakadi 464 186 80 60 97 13 2 80 

TOTAL 3300 1824 510 960 728 132 132 250 

Watershed Activities


Watershed management as a strategy has been adopted by Government of India especially in the rain-fed regions of semi-arid tropics. These regions 

are characterized by low and undependable rain, low soil fertility, poor infrastructure development, low literacy and high incidence of migration. Several 

studies have identified that there is a dire need of a systematic and scientific approach to deal with watershed development. The common guidelines 

generate a fresh and flexible framework for the next generation watershed development. 

4.1. Scientific Planning: 

i) Cluster Approach 

This envisages a broader vision of Geo-hydrological unit which involves treating a cluster of micro-watershed. The Eval Project consists of four micro- 

watersheds namely 5G2C4d1b, 5G2C4d1a, 5G2C4d2d, 5G2C4c3m as their respective codes. 

ii) Base line Survey 

To access the impact of any watershed development programme a detailed baseline survey has to be conducted. This acts a benchmark for any intervention 

during and post implementation of any development programme. A detailed baseline survey was undertaken which involved household census survey, Biophysical 

survey and Village level data collection from Talati –cum mantri. Household census survey includes a detailed questionnaire which was been filled 

by visiting each and every household in the village. This gave in the details of the demographic profile of the village, the literacy percentage, SC/ST 

population, number of BPL household, cattle population, net consumption rate in the village, average milk production of the cattle and various schemes 

running and their benefits 

Bio-physical survey was undertaken to identify various natural resources available in the village. It included the soil typology, well in the area, crop taken in 

the field, Cropping pattern, fertilizer used and various sources of irrigation in the field.


iii) Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA) 

The past experience of watershed has given tremendous input to focus on creating accountability of the stakeholders towards the programme. This has 

created an emphasis to include all the stakeholder communities and their local and indigenous Technological Knowledge (ITK) while planning for any 

activity. Participatory approach provides a new path for planning, implementing, and monitoring and post- withdrawal activities with a complete 

accountability of the stakeholders. Various PRA techniques like resource mapping, social mapping, and season calendars were used to understand the 

physical and social orientation of the village in general and watershed in specific. These tools put the villagers in ease than the complicated questionnaires. 

Various tools like Matrix ranking, Venn Diagram were used to identify various local vegetations (apt for afforestation), Fodders crops , various institution 

and their significance in the life of the farmers 

iv) Use of GIS and Remote Sensing for Planning 

Use of various high science tools has been promoted at various stages of watershed development. 

a) Prioritization 

Geographical Information System (GIS) has been used for prioritization process. Various layer maps were created like Geo-morphological, Soil, BPL 

Population, SC/ST population, Ground water Status, Drinking water situation Slope percent. These were all given proper weightage according to the DoLR 

specification. This helped in prioritization of various watershed areas. 

b) Planning 

A action plan matrix was formulated by State Level Nodal Agency (SLNA) taking into account various features like the slope percent, soil Depth, Soil Texture, 

Soil erosion in the area for wasteland, forest land and agricultural land. Global positioning System (GPS) was used to identify each and every water


conservation structures available in the project area. This was used to create a map. Contour Map of vertical interval of 1 meter at a scale of 1:8000 was used 

for identifying various locations for soil and water conservation structures. 

c) Hydrological modeling 

Hydrology modelling technique was used for locating drainage, stream length, flow direction, sink, Flow accumulation. This model overlaid over cadastral 

map to calculate the catchment area of each structures like the check dam etc. This has helped to remove the human error which generally occurs while 

calculating the catchment area of a check dam. 

Table no. 30: Details of Scientific Planning and Inputs in IWMP projects 

S. No. Scientific criteria/ inputs used 

Whether scientific criteria was 

used 

(A) Planning 

Cluster approach 

√ 

Whether technical back-stopping for the project has been arranged? If yes, mention the name of the 

Institute 

√ 

Baseline survey 

√ 

Hydro-geological survey 

√ 

Contour mapping 

√ 

Participatory Net Planning (PNP) 

√ 

Remote sensing data-especially soil/ crop/ run-off cover √ 

Ridge to Valley treatment 

√


Online IT connectivity between 

(1) Project and DRDA cell/ZP √ 

(2) DRDA and SLNA √ 

(3) SLNA and DoLR √ 

Availability of GIS layers 

1. Cadastral map √ 

2. Village boundaries √ 

3. Drainage √ 

4. Soil (Soil nutrient status) 

5. Land use √ 

6. Ground water status √ 

7. Watershed boundaries √ 

8. Activity √ 

Crop simulation models # 

Integrated coupled analyzer/ near infrared visible spectroscopy/ medium spectroscopy for high speed soil 

nutrient analysis 

Normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI)# 

√ 

Weather Station 

(B) Inputs 

1. Bio-pesticides 

2. Organic manures √


3. Vermicompost √ 

4. Bio-fertilizer √ 

5. Water saving devices √ 

6. Mechanized tools/ implements √ 

7. Bio-fencing √ 

8. Nutrient budgeting √ 

9. Automatic water level recorders & sediment samplers 

Any other (please specify) 

#NDVI - Ratio of the differences of the response of vegetation in the near infrared & red regions of the electromagnetic spectrum 

Table no. 31: Watershed Committee details 

It is a committee that is constituted by Gram Sabha to implement the watershed project with technical support of WDT in the village. This committee 

is registered under Society Registration Act 1860. The Gram Sabha of the village selects the chairman of the watershed committee with secretary who 

will be a paid functionary. 

WDT member is also a member of Watershed committee. There will be separate a bank account for watershed project fund. Money can be debited 

by joint signature of Nodal Officer (PIA representative), president & secretary of Watershed committee. 

The watershed committee has a pivotal role to play during and after the project implementation period. 

Limbada


Sr. 

No. 

Name 

1 Dharamshih Gohil 

Date of 

Registration 

as a Society 

(dd/mm/ 

yyyy) Designation M/F SC ST SF MF LF 

Landless 

UG SHG GP 

2 Unisbhai S. Daraya President - - Y Y Y - - 10 ST 

3 Bhupatbhai Dangar Secretary 

4 Devabhai Motishariya Member - - - Y - 

5 Bhikhabhai Sangdiya Member - - Y Y - - - 

6 Gagjibhai Motisariya Member - - Y Y Y - - 3 ST 

7 Haribhai Motisariya Member - - - - 

8 Palabhai N. Solanki Member - - Y - - 

9 Madhubhai U Sonani Member Y - - - - 

10 Madhubhai H. Sindhav Member - - Y - - 

11 Laxmiben B. Humbal Member - - 

12 Nodal Officer Member Y 

13 WDT Member Y 

Any 

other 

Educational 

qualification 

Function/s 

assigned#


Sl. 

No. 

Names of WCs 


Registratio 

n as a 

Society 

(dd/mm/ 

yyyy) 

1 Vashrambhai N Dagar President 

2 Desurbhai L kuvadiya Secretary 

Table no. 31: Watershed Committee details - Ranghola 

Designation M/F SC ST SF MF LF 

- - 

- - 

UG 

SH 

G 

GP 

Any 

other 

Landless 

Educational 

qualification 

Functi 

on/s 

assign 

ed# 

Y Y Y - - - 

Y Y - - - 

3 Dhakarsihabhai V Navdiya Member - - Y Y - - - 

- - 

4 Gitaben. H Medapra Member 

Y Y Y - - - 

5 Bupatbhai K Sanga Member - - - Y Y - - - - 

6 Popatbhai S Jabukiya Member - - - Y - Y - - - - 

7 .Rekhaben B Parmar Member Y - - - Y Y - - - 

8 Muniben N Chavda Member - - - Y - Y - - - 

9 Devabhai J Khaman Member - - - Graduat 

e 

10 Ajitsins B Gohil Member 

11 Asokbhai L Dagar Member 

12 Dirubhai L Meriya Member 

13 Varshaben B Rathad Member 

14 Nodal Officer Member Y 

15 WDT Member Y


Sl. 

No. 



Registrat 

ion as a 

Society 

(dd/mm 

/ yyyy) 

Table no. 31: Watershed Committee details - Langala 

Designation 

M/ 

F 

SC ST SF MF LF 

UG 

SH 

G 

GP 

Any 

other 

Landless 

Educational 

qualification 

1 Rambhai.B. shanga. 06/2010 President M - - Y Y Y - - 7 - 

Nodal Officer 

Graduat 

2 

Secretary 

e 

3 Dhirubhai. D. Danger 06/2010 Member 

4 Lalubhai j Navadiya. 06/2010 Member 

M - - 

M - - 

Function/ 

s 

assigned# 

Y Y Y - - 10 std - 

Y Y - - 8 std - 

5 Narshibhai b. Radhod 06/2010 Member M - - y y - - 7 std - 

6 Ghimabhai b. Chavada. 06/2010 Member 

M - - 

Y y y - - 7 std - 

7 Jagdishbhai.j. Kuvadiya 06/2010 Member M - - - Y Y - - - 8 std - 

8 Laxmiben k. Chad. 06/2010 Member F - - - Y - Y - - - 5 std - 

9 Liliben. R. 

06/2010 Member F Y - - - Y Y - - 7 std - 

Parmar. 

10 Bhavanaben.A. shanga. 06/2010 Member F - - - -y - Y - - 9std - 

11 WDT/ Team leader 06\2010 Member F - - - Graduat 

e


Table no. 31: Watershed Committee details - Devaliya 

Sl. 

No 

. 



Registration 

as a Society 

(dd/mm/ 

yyyy) 

Designatio 

n 

M/F SC ST SF MF LF 

UG SHG GP 

Any 

other 

Landless 

Educational 

qualification 

Function/s 

assigned# 

1 Ghori Khodabhai Giridharbhai President - - Y Y Y - - - 

2 Digubha Ranjitshih Gohil 

Secretary 

3 Mansukhbha Ranchodbha Member 

4 .Gohil bahadur shinh Lalubha Member 

- - 

- - 

Y Y Y - - - 

Y Y - - - 

5 Lakmanbhai Nathubha Member - - Y Y - - - 

6 Gitaben Muljibhai Member 

- - 

Y Y Y - - - 

7 Viththalbhai Khimabhai Member - - - Y Y - - - - 

8 Nimlaben Chelshankar Member - - - Y - Y - - - - 

9 Savjibhai Bala Member Y - - - Y Y - - - 

10 Champaben Govindbhai Member 

11 Naranbhai Deveraj Kakadiya Member 

12 Nodal Officer Member - - - Y - Y - - - 

13 WDT/ Team Leader Member - - - Y Graduate


Dedakadi 

Sl. 

No. 



Registration 

as a Society 

(dd/mm/ 

yyyy) 

Designation M/F SC ST SF MF LF Lan 

d- 

less 

UG SHG GP Any 

oth 

er 

1 Ghanashambhai R. Gohil President M - - Y - - - Y - - - 5 Pass 

2 Dhirubhai. K. Chauhan. M 7 Pass 

Educational 

qualification 

Function/s 

assigned# 

3 Bhanabhai.B. Kotar Secretary M - - - - - Y - Y Y - 4 Pass 

4 Chaganabhai. D. Makavana Member M - - - - - Y - Y - -- 4 Pass 

5 Babubhai .v. Makavana Member M - - - - - Y - Y - 5 Pass 

6 Manjibhai P. Vaghashiya Member M - - - - - Y - Y - - 7 Pass 

7 Bharatbhai. B.Paramar Member M - - - - Y - Y - - - 5 Pass 

8 Parbhaben.V. Makvana. Member F - - - - Y - Y - - - 10 Pass 

9 Jashuben. K. Shiju Member F - - - - - Y Y - - 5 Pass 

10 Manchaba. D. Gohil Member F Y - - - - Y - Y - - 5 Pass 

11 Nodal officer Member M - - - - Y - Y - - - Graduate 

12 WDT Member Member Graduate 

# Only the letter assigned, as below, needs to be typed, except for `J’, where the type may be specifically mentioned. 

A. PNP and PRA B. Planning 

C. Maintenance of Accounts D. Signing of cheques and making payments 

E. Supervision of construction activities F. Cost Estimation 

G. Verification & Measurement H. Record of labour employed 

I. Social Audit J. Any other (please specify).


SHG Formation 

Self Help Groups are formed of weaker section of the society. Community Mobilizer will play an important role in this activity. 

The Watershed Committee shall constitute SHGs in the watershed area with the help of WDT from amongst poor, small and marginal farmer 

households, landless/asset less poor agricultural laborers, women, shepherds and SC/ST persons. These Groups shall be homogenous groups 

having common identity and interest who are dependent on the watershed area for their livelihood. Each Self Help Group will be provided with 

a revolving fund of an amount to be decided by DWDU. 

S. No. 

With 

only 

Men 

Total no. of registered SHGs 

With only 

Women 

With 

both 

1 3 4 1 8 

Table no. 32: SHG detail - Limbada 

No. of members 

No. of SC/ST in each 

category 

No. of BPL in each 

category 

Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total 

(i) Landless 27 27 54 11 15 26 5 6 11 

(ii) SF 

(iii) MF 

(iv) LF 11 33 44 

Total 3 4 1 8 38 56 98 11 15 26 5 6 11


S. No. 

With 

only 

Men 


With only 

Women 

With 

both 

1 3 4 1 8 

Table no. 32: SHG detail - Ranghola 



category 


category 


(i) Landless 27 27 54 11 15 26 5 6 11 

(ii) SF 

(iii) MF 

(iv) LF 11 33 44 

Total 3 4 1 8 38 56 98 11 15 26 5 6 11 

S. No. 

With 

only 

Men 


With only 

Women 

With 

both 

1 2 5 1 8 

Table no. 32: SHG detail- Langala 



category 


category 


(i) Landless 20 15 35 11 13 24 11 11 

(ii) SF 

(iii) MF 

(iv) LF 11 46 57 

Total 2 5 1 8 31 61 92 24 11


S. No. 

With 

only 

Men 


With only 

Women 

With 

both 

1 3 2 1 6 

Table no. 32: SHG detail - Devaliya 



category 


category 


(i) Landless 22 11 33 11 11 22 11 

(ii) SF 

(iii) MF 5 11 16 

(iv) LF 11 5 16 15 15 11 

Total 3 2 1 6 38 27 65 26 11 37 22 

S. No. 

With 

only 

Men 


With only 

Women 

With 

both 

1 2 4 1 7 

Table no. 32: SHG detail – Dedakadi 



category 


category 


Total 22 48 70 

(i) Landless 11 37 48 1 2 3 - - - 

(ii) SF - - - - - - - - - 

(iii) MF - - - - - - - - - 

(iv) LF 11 11 22 - - - - - -


User Groups 

The Watershed Committee (WC) shall also constitute User Groups in the watershed area with the help of WDT. These are homogenous 

groups of persons most affected by each work/ activity and shall include those having land holdings within the watershed areas. Each User 

Group shall consist of those who are likely to derive direct benefits from a particular watershed work or activity. The Watershed Committee 

(WC) with the help of the WDT shall facilitate resource-use agreements among the User Groups based on the principles of equity and 

sustainability. 

Table no. 33: UG detail- Limbada 

No. of SC/ST in each No. of BPL in each 

Total no. of UGs 


S. No. 

category 

category 

Men Women Both Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total 

(i)Landless 20 - 20 6 5 11 11 11 

1 5 1 6 

(ii) SF 20 - 20 - - - 

(iii) MF 35 - 35 - -- - 

(iv) LF 14 - 14 - - - 

Total 5 4 1 6 89 89 6 5 11 11 11 

Table no. 33: UG detail - Ranghola 




S. No. 

category 

category 


(i)Landless 20 - 20 6 5 11 11 11 

1 5 4 1 10 

(ii) SF 20 - 20 - - - 

(iii) MF 35 - 35 - -- - 

(iv) LF 14 - 14 - - - 

Total 5 4 1 10 89 89 6 5 11 11 11


Table no. 33: UG detail - Langala 




S. No. 

category 

category 


(i)Landless 30 - 30 10 - 10 12 12 

1 8 1 2 11 

(ii) SF - - - - - - 13 13 

(iii) MF 38 - 38 - -- - 

(iv) LF 10 - 10 - - - 

Total 8 1 2 11 78 10 - 10 25 25 

Table no. 33: UG detail- Devaliya 




S. No. 

category 

category 


(i)Landless 15 - 15 - 15 10 10 

1 4 - - 4 

(ii) SF 10 - - - - - 

(iii) MF 15 - 15 - -- - 

(iv) LF 4 - 4 - - - 

Total 4 -- - 4 44 19 15 - 15 10 10 

Table no. 33: UG detail – Dedakadi 


Total no. of Ugs 


S. No. 

category 

category 


(i)Landless 27 15 42 1 - 1 1 - 1 

1 8 1 1 10 

(ii) SF 22 - - 2 - 2 - - - 

(iii) MF 22 - - 1 - 1 - - - 

(iv) LF 22 - - - - - - - - 

Total 93 15 108


Entry Point Activity: 

Entry point activity is an important work for project implementation Agency (PIA) , which will help them to establish rapport with village people and 

get in to the village. So entry point activity should be selected very carefully which will give benefit to all village people. Success of any project depends on 

involvement of local community. Villagers are the important stake holders who will be directly benefited from the project. Entry point activity is done during 

first phase of the project. It is done solve immediate problem of the village and create good impression & feeling so the villager support the watershed 

project & it can be run successfully. 

The village is facing acute shortage of water. One check dam constructed by villagers however its apron wall had not been made due to lack of sufficient 

fund. So their first requirement is to construct apron wall the check dam. Another big problem in the project area is of crop protection, animals like antelope, 

deer, pig spoil atleast 20 percent of crop output. If we reduce it then production will automatically raise. So it can be protected by electric shock & sound 

system. When animal touch the line it get electric shock & sound come out so it will run away. 

S. 

No. 

Names of Villages 

Amount 

earmarked for 

EPA 

1 Limbada 8.20 

2 Ranghola 5.88 

Table no.34: Entry point activities (EPA) (All financial figures in lakh Rs.) 

Entry Point Activities planned 

Estimated 

cost 

Cause Way cum check dam 4.80 

Fund Used 

under IWMP 

Fund 

Available by 

Convergence 

Convergence 

Scheme 

Expected 

outcome 

- - - Surface 

Water 

storage 

Agro Crop Training 0.25 

- - Improve 

Productivity 

Books For Library 0.20 - - - 

Travis 0.32 - - - 

Repair of check dam 2.75 

- - - Conserve 

Water 

- - - 

Travis 0.32 - - 

Cause way Cum Check Dam 4.73 - - - 

Improved Crematoria 0.32 - - - Save tree


3 Langala 

5.25 

4 Devaliya 3.94 

5 

Dedakadi 

2.12 

Repair of Well with recharge structure 0.57 - - - 

Cause Way cum Check Dam 3.45 - - - 

Well Recharge Structure & Cleaning 1.20 - 

Improved Crematoria 0.30 - - - 

Travis 0.25 - - - 

Water Tank 2.99 

- - - Water 

storage 

Improved Crematora 0.25 - - Save tree 

Repair of well 0.70 - - - 

Improved Crematoria 0.32 - - - Save tree 

1.79 0.71 MGNREGA Surface 

Check Dam Repair & Desilting 2.50 

Water 

storage 

Table no.35: Details of activities of preparatory phase (All financial figures in lakh Rs.) 

S. No. Name of villages 

Report 

Identifying 

Estimated Cost 

Initiation of village Capacity 

Baseline Hydro-geological 

Preparation 

IEC activities 

technical 

(Rs. in lakh) 

level institution building 

survey 

survey 

& 

support agencies 

Stationary 

1 Limbada 0.33 0.50 0.20 0.35 0.20 0.30 0.20 2.08 

2 Ranghola 0.20 0.27 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.30 0.20 1.47 

3 Langala 0.10 0.21 0.10 0.25 0.20 0.30 0.15 1.31 

4 Devaliya 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.20 0.08 0.30 0.10 0.98 

5 Dedakadi 0.10 0.06 0.05 0.12 0.05 0.30 0.05 0.53 

TOTAL 0.83 1.14 0.65 1.12 0.73 1.5 0.7 6.37 

#One of the following may be entered in columns: Completed (ii) in progress (iii) just started (iv) not started


Surface water storage structure 

Table no.37.1: Activities related to recharging ground water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.) 

Proposed target 

Augmentation/ repair of existing Construction of new recharging 

S. No. Name of Villages Type of structures recharging structures 

structures 

Total target 

No. 

Area to be Estimated 

Area to be Estimated Area to be Estimated 

No. 

irrigated (ha) cost 

irrigated (ha) cost irrigated (ha) cost 

1 Limbada 

(i)Open wells 20 30 2.00 30 2.00 

Total for the village 

2 Ranghola 

(i)Open wells 10 50 1.00 50 1.00 


3 Langala 

(i)Open wells 10 100 1.00 50 1.00 


4 Devaliya 

(i)Open wells 10 40 1.00 40 1.00 


5 Dedakadi 

(i)Open wells 10 40 0.50 40 1.00 


Total for the Project 210.00 6.00


S. No. 


Villages 

Limbada 

Ranghola 

Table no. 38.1: Activities related to livelihoods by Self Help Groups (SHGs) in the project areas 

Major activities of the SHGs 

Name of activity No. of SHGs involved Average annual income from activity per SHG 

Washing Powder/ Soap making 1 1.00 

Animal Feed Silo 2 0.70 

Tutti Fruiti 1 0.70 

Handi Crafts (Fiber) 1 0.50 

Mandap Service 1 1.40 

Farm implement leasing 3 0.60 

Animal Husbandry 2 0.50 

Tutti Fruiti 1 0.70 

Patti machine 1 0.60 

Mandap Service 1 1.30 


Washing Powder 1 0.70


Sewing Machine 1 0.40 

Transportation 1 1.00 

Cold drinks/ Kirana shop 1 0.30 

Langala Washing Powder/ Soap making 1 0.60 

Animal Husbandry 1 0.60 


Handi Crafts (rexin Purse) 1 0.50 

Grih Udyog (pickles. Papad etc) 1 0.40 

Milk Processing – Sweet making 1 0.45 

Devaliya Diamond polishing 1 1.00 

Handy Crafts (rexin Purse) 1 0.60 

Milk Processing 1 0.50 

Flour mill 1 0.80 

Sewing machine 1 0.40 

Handy crafts 1 0.45 

Dedakadi Animal Husbandry 1 0.60 

SANTING 1 0.50 

Leather Purse, Shoes 1 0.50 

Vermi compost 2 0.30 

Nursery 2


Table no.40.1: Details of engineering structures in watershed works*- Limbada 

Type of treatment 

Type of land 

Executing 

agency 

Target 

No. of Estimated cost (Rs. in 

Village 

(ii) 

(iii) (i) UG 

S. No. 

Name of structures 

(iii) 

units 

lakh) 

name 

(i) Ridge Drainage 

(i) (ii) Others (ii)SHG 

Land dev. 

(No./ 

area (R) line 

Pri-vate Community (pl. (iii) Others 

(L) 

cu.m./ M W O T 

(D) 

specify) (pl. specify) 

rmt) 

Contour trench R C WC 3000 2.70 

Graded Trench R C WC 2050 5.88 

Staggered Contour Bund R C WC 750 6.08 

Check Wall D C WC 2 3.00 

Earthen Bund D C WC 1100 Rmt 7.56 

checks dams D P C WC 15 37.20 

Limbada Gully plug R P WC 4 2.60 

Field Outlet R P WC 50 5.00 

Roof Water Harvesting 

Structure 

WC 100 30.00 

Field Bund L P 8000 3.60 

Land Levelling L P 8500 m3 4.25 

Percolation Tank C 2 3.00 

Total 110.87 

(M – Materials, W- wages, O- others, T – Total) 

Expected 

month & 

year of 

completion 

(mm/yyyy)


Table no.40.2: Details of engineering structures in watershed works* Ranghola 



Executing 

agency 

Target 

(i) UG No. of Estimated cost (Rs. Expected 

S. Village 

(ii) 


(iii) 

(ii)SHG units in lakh) month & 

No. name 


(i) (ii) (iii) Others 

Land dev. 

(iii) Others (No./ 


area (R) line 

Private Community (pl. specify) 

(L) 

(pl. cu.m./ M W O T completion 

(D) 

specify) rmt) 

(mm/yyyy) 

Waste Weir D Community 1 2.00 

Percolation tank D Community 1 3.38 

Bunding D Community 1000 Rmt 7.20 

checks dams D Private 4 8.50 


structure 

Private 100 30.00 

Ranghola Gully plug R Private 20 22.00 

Field Outlet R Private 30 4.50 

Field Bunding L Private 10,000 5.00 

Land Levelling L Private 15000m3 6.00 

Stone Pitching c 3300 2.15 

Total 93.73 

(M – Materials, W- wages, O- others, T – Total)


Table no.40.3: Details of engineering structures in watershed works* Langala 



Executing 

agency 

Target 

No. of Estimated cost (Rs. in Expected 

Village 

(ii) 

(iii) (i) UG 

S. No. 


(iii) 

units 

lakh) 

month & 

name 



Land dev. 

(No./ 


area (R) line 


(L) 

cu.m./ M W O T completion 

(D) 


rmt) 

(mm/yyyy) 

Percolation Tank D C WC 7 21.00 

Field Bund L P WC 5000 4.20 

Farm Pond D P WC 5 1.00 

checks dams D P WC 4 11.30 

Rain Roof Water Harvesting 

Langala structure 

P WC 100 30.00 

Land levelling L P WC 

5700 

m3 

2.00 

Gully plug R P 6 3.00 

Field Outlet R P WC 15 2.25 

Any others (pl. specify) 

Total 74.75 

(M – Materials, W- wages, O- others, T – Total)


Table No 40.4 : Details of engineering structures in watershed works* 



Executing 

agency 

Target 

No. of Estimated cost (Rs. in 

Village 

(ii) 

(iii) (i) UG 

S. No. 


(iii) 

units 

lakh) 

name 



Land dev. 

(No./ 

area (R) line 


(L) 

cu.m./ M W O T 

(D) 


rmt) 

Farm Pond L P 12 2.40 

Field Bund L P 4000 2.00 

Land Levelling L P 3.00 

Checks dams D C 5 13.50 

Devaliya 


structure 

P 24.00 

Field Outlet R P 80 12.00 

Any others (pl. specify) 

Total 56.90 


Expected 

month & 


completion 

(mm/yyyy)


Village 

(ii) 

S. No. 


(iii) 

name 


Land dev. 

area (R) line 

(L) 

(D) 

Table no. 40.5: Details of engineering structures in watershed works* 

Executing 



Target 

agency 

No. of 

(iii) (i) UG 

units 


(No./ 

Private Community (pl. (iii) Others 

cu.m./ 


rmt) 

Estimated cost (Rs. in 

lakh) 

M W O T 

checks dams D P WC 4 6.35 4.25 10.60 


structure 

P WC 33 6.00 4.00 10.00 

5 Dedakadi Gully plug R P WC 4.05 2.70 6.75 

Pond D 3.00 3.00 

Waste weir 2.00 2.00 

Field Outlet L P WC 10 0.60 0.40 0 1.50 

Total 33.85 


Expected 

month & 


completion 

(mm/yyyy)


Table no.41.1: Details of activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works 

Type of 

treatment 


Executing 

agency 

Target 

S. 

No. 

Name of village 


structure/ work 

(iii) Land 

dev. (L) 

(i) 

Private 

(ii) 

Community 

(iii) Others 

(pl. 

specify) 

(i) UG 

(ii)SHG 

(iii) Others 

(pl. specify) 

Area (ha) 

No. 

of 

pla 

nts 

Estimated cost 

(Rs. in lakh) 

Expected 

month & year 

of completion 

(mm/ yyyy) 

Afforestation L C 5.00 7.50 

Limbada 

Wire Fencing L P 14.00 

Gram Vatika L 0.16 1.00 

Total 22.50 

Table no.41.2: Details of activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works Ranghola 


treatment 


Executing 

agency 

Target 

S. 

No. 


village 

Name of structure/ 

work 

(iii) Land 

dev. (L) 

(i) 

Private 

(ii) 

Community 

(iii) Others 

(pl. 

specify) 

(i) UG 

(ii)SHG 

(iii) Others 

(pl. specify) 

Area (ha) 

No. 


pla 

nts 


(Rs. in lakh) 

Expected 

month & year 


(mm/ yyyy) 

Afforestation L 2.00 2.00 2.50 

Ranghola 

Barbed Wire Fencing L 6300 Rmt 14.00 


Total 17.50


Table no.41.3: Details of activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works - Langala 


treatment 


Executing 

agency 

Target 

S. 

No. 




(iii) Land 

dev. (L) 

(i) 

Private 

(ii) 

Community 

(iii) Others 

(pl. 

specify) 

(i) UG 

(ii)SHG 

(iii) Others 

(pl. specify) 

Area (ha) 

No. 


pla 

nts 


(Rs. in lakh) 

Expected 

month & year 


(mm/ yyyy) 

Afforestation L 2.00 2.00 2.00 

Langala 

Wire Fencing 12.00 


Total 15.00 



treatment 


Executing 

agency 

Target 

S. 

No. 


village 

Name of structure/ 

work 

(iii) Land 

dev. (L) 

(i) 

Private 

(ii) 

Community 

(iii) Others 

(pl. 

specify) 

(i) UG 

(ii)SHG 

(iii) Others 

(pl. specify) 

Area (ha) 

No. 


pla 

nts 


(Rs. in lakh) 

Expected 

month & year 


(mm/ yyyy) 


Devaliya 

Wire fencing 10.00 


Total 14.00




treatment 


Executing 

agency 

Target 

S. 

No. 




(iii) Land 

dev. (L) 

(i) 

Private 

(ii) 

Community 

(iii) Others 

(pl. 

specify) 

(i) UG 

(ii)SHG 

(iii) Others 

(pl. specify) 

Area (ha) 

No. 


pla 

nts 


(Rs. in lakh) 

Expected 

month & year 


(mm/ yyyy) 

Dedakadi 



Total 3.00


For micro enterprise & Production System 

Table no.42: Details of allied / other activities Limbada 

Sr. 

No. 


Limbada 


Executing 

agency 

Target 

(i) UG 

Expected 

Name of activity 

Estimated 

(ii) (iii) Others (ii)SHG 

month & year 

(i) Private 

cost 

Community (pl. specify) (iii) Others (pl. 


(Rs. in lakh) 

specify) 

(mm/yyyy) 

Crop demonstration with drip 

irrigation – 5+5 

P WC/others 7.00 2011-14 

Fodder Development(pasture land) C SHG 2.00 2011-12 

Cattle Camp 10 C WC 2.00 2010-14 

Cotton Stem Removing Clamp WC 2.00 

Drip irrigation – 15 P WC 3.75 

Chaff Cutter – 50 UG 0.50 

Kitchen Garden – 200 P WC 2.00 

Fodder seeds – 50 P UG 1.00 

Horticultural Plants P UG 3.00 

Improved/ Hybrid Seeds – 70 P UG 0.70 

Vermi Compost - 32 C UG 3.20 

Pesticides (Protection) Safety Suit UG 0.50 

Total 27.65


For Asset less people 

Washing Powder/ Soap making - SHG 1.00 

Animal Feed Silo – 2 P/C SHG 2.60 

Tutti Fruiti - SHG 1.20 

Handi Crafts (Fiber) - SHG 1.20 

Mandap Service - SHG 1.75 

Beauty Parlour - SHG 0.50 

Tractor mounted tool (Rotavator)3 - SHG 2.40 

Sprayer 5 - SHG 1.00 

Revolving Fund 12 - SHG 1.20 

Sowing machine 2 - SHG 2.00 

Thresher 3 - SHG 3.00 

Nursery 2 - SHG 1.60 

Solar Cooker 50 - UG 2.00 

Handicrafts (With use of waste) - SHG 1.00 

Electric motor for pot making UG 1.00 

Total 22.25



Table no.42: Details of allied / other activities Ranghola 

Sr. 

No. 


Ranghola 


Executing 

agency 

Target 

(i) UG 

Expected 


Estimated 


month & year 

(i) Private 

cost 



(Rs. in lakh) 

specify) 

(mm/yyyy) 

Crop demonstration with drip irrigation P C WC 3.00 

Fodder Development(pasture land) C UG 2.00 

Cattle Camp - UG 3.00 

Cotton stem removing clamp – 100 - UG 1.00 

Drip irrigation – 10 P UG 2.50 

Chaff Cutter 100 - UG 1.00 

Kitchen Garden 150 - UG 1.50 

Improved Fodder seeds - 50 50 UG 1.00 

Horticultural Plants - P UG 1.50 

Nursery – 2 P SHG 0.50 

Vermi Compost – 40 P C UG 4.00


Pesticides (Protection) safety suit - 50 UG 0.50 

Total 21.50 


Animal Husbandry C WC 1.50 

Tutti Fruiti P SHG 1.00 

Patti machine – 2 - - - SHG 3.00 

Mandap Service - - - SHG 1.75 

Animal Feed Silo – 2 C SHG 2.00 

Washing Powder - - - SHG 1.00 

Sewing Machine - - - SHG 0.50 

Transportation - - - SHG 1.50 

Cold drinks/ Kirana shop P - - SHG 0.50 

Revolving Fund - - - SHG 1.00 

Farm Machinery leasing – Rotavator - - - UG 1.60 

Sprayer 5 - - - UG 0.50 

Sawing machine 5 - - - UG 1.00 

Total 16.85



Table no.42: Details of allied / other activities Langala 

Sr. 

No. 


Executing 

agency 

Target 

(i) UG 

Expected 



Estimated 


month & year 

(i) Private 

cost 



(Rs. in lakh) 

specify) 

(mm/yyyy) 

Langala 


irrigation (5+5) 

P C WC/others 4.50 

“ Fodder Development(pasture land) C SHG 1.00 

“ Cattle Camp 10 - WC 3.00 

“ Cotton Stem Removing Clamp - UG 0.50 

“ Drip irrigation P UG 3.00 

“ Chaff Cutter 50 - UG 0.50 

“ Kitchen Garden 150 P UG 1.50 

“ Fodder seeds 50 P UG 1.00 

“ Vermi Compost 30 P UG 3.00


“ Pesticides Protection coat 50 - UG 0.50 

“ Total 19.00 

“ For Asset less people 

“ Animal Husbandry – 2 - 2.40 

“ Animal Feed Silo -2 C 2.00 

“ Handy Crafts (rexin Purse) - 0.75 

“ Grih Udyog (pickles. Papad etc making) - 0.50 

“ Milk Processing – Sweet making - 0.50 

“ Revolving – 7 - 0.70 

“ Mandap Service - 1.50 

“ Farm Machinery Leasing – Rotavator 2 - 1.60 

“ Bio gas plant – 10 P 1.00 

“ Sowing Machine – 5 - 1.00 

“ Thresher – 2 - 2.00 

“ TOTAL 13.95



Table no.42: Details of allied / other activities Devaliya 

Sr. 

No. 


Devaliya 


Executing 

agency 

Target 

(i) UG 

Expected 


Estimated 


month & year 

(i) Private 

cost 



(Rs. in lakh) 

specify) 

(mm/yyyy) 


irrigation – 5 

WC/others 3.00 2011-14 

Fodder Development(pasture land) SHG 1.00 2011-12 

Cattle Camp – 10 WC 1.50 2010-14 

Cotton Stem opener – 75 UG 0.75 

Drip irrigation -5 UG 1.00 

Chaff Cutter – 25 UG 0.25 

Kitchen Garden seeds – 100 Community 1.00 

Improved Fodder seeds – 25 UG 0.25 

Horticultural Plants – 75 UG 1.00 

Biogas Plant – 2 UG 0.50 

Well Cleaning – 1 SHG 0.20 

Improved/ Hybrid Seeds – 25 0.50


Vermi Compost – 25 UG 2.50 

Pesticides Protection suits – 40 UG 0.40 

Total 13.85 


Diamond polishing P SHG 0.88 

Handy Crafts (Rexin Purse) P SHG 0.75 

Milk Processing P SHG 0.50 

Flour mill P SHG 0.80 

Sewing machine P SHG 0.50 

Handy crafts P SHG 0.50 

Tractor mounted tool (Rotavator) P SHG 0.80 

Sprayer 5 P SHG 0.50 

Revolving Fund 5 P SHG 0.50 

Sowing machine 2 P SHG 0.50 

Thresher 1 P SHG 1.50 

Nursery C SHG 0.80 

Solar Cooker 50 Others SHG 1.50 

Total 10.03


Table no.42: Details of allied / other activities 


Sr. 

No. 


Dedakadi 


Executing 

agency 

Target 

(i) UG 

Expected 


Estimated 


month & year 

(i) Private 

cost 



(Rs. in lakh) 

specify) 

(mm/yyyy) 


irrigation(5+5) 

P C WC/others 2.22 2011-14 

Fodder Development(pasture land) 2 C SHG 2.65 2011-12 

Cattle Camp 5 WC 0.80 2010-14 

Milk Collection Centre P SHG 1.80 

Chaff Cutter 3 P UG 1.17 

Improved/ Hybrid Seeds 30 P UG 0.45 

Total 8.24 


Vermi Compost 1 C SHG 0.80 

Nursery 2 C SHG 0.80 

Kitchen Garden 40 P WC 0.60 

Animal Husbandry 2 - SHG 3.00


Handicrafts1 - 0.20 

Apparatus for Santing 1 - SHG 0.10 

Revolving Fund 7 - 0.70 

Total 6.20 

Note: Remaining amount will be taken as people’s contribution towards their benefit 

Table no. 44: Capacity Building Institution: 

Capacity building is a continuous process. As stake holders of Watershed program should know how to use preserve natural resources use of assets 

crated under watershed program in sustainable manner, so all the stake holders including PIA, WDT, WC, SHG ,UG & village community needs tobe train for 

that. As various NGOs & government institutes are ready to do this work. But a grass root level Krishi Vigyan Kendra (KVK) has to deliver well as they have 

one of the best extension wing. KVK situated in Sanosara village of Shihor taluka. Which is only 8 Km away from project area. SPIPA & DSC will train PIA & 

WDT for proper implementation of program, while BIAF & VRTI will work for animal Husbandry & community mobilization. 

S. No. 


Training 

Institute 

Full Address with 

contact no., 

website & e-mail 


Institute# 

Area(s) of 

specialization 

Accreditation 

details 

Reference Year 

Trainings 

No. of trainings 

assigned 

No. of trainees 

to be trained 

Development 

Support Centre 

Ahmedabad 

NGO 

Capacity 

Building 

Society Reg. Act 2010-2013 20 10 

BISAG 

Gandhinagar 

Space 

Application 

GIS, Remote 

Sensing 

GoG 2010-2013 8 10 

VRTI – Kutch Bhavnagar NGO 

Capacity 

Building 

Society Reg. Act 2010-2014 30 500


BIAF Vadodara NGO 

Animal 

Husbandry 

Society Reg. Act 2010-2013 10 250 

SPIPA Ahmedabad State Govt. Administration GoG 2010-2014 10 10 

KVK 

Sanosara – 

Research 

Bhavnagar 

Institute 

Agriculture GoI 2010-2014 30 500 

# Central govt. Dept./ State govt. Dept./ Autonomous Body/ Research Institutes/ Universities/ Others (pl. specify) 

$ Capacity Building/ Agriculture/ Horticulture/ Animal Husbandry/ Pisciculture/ Remote Sensing/ Water conservation/ Ground water/ Forestry/ 

livelihoods/ entrepreneurship development/ others (pl. specify) 

Table no. 45: Capacity Building plan: 

S. No. State Project Stakeholders 

Total no. of No. of persons to be 

persons 

trained 

No. of training programmes Estimated cost 

DWDU Members 5 5 8 2.50 

PIA 2 2 10 2.00 

WDT 5 5 10 4.50 

UGs 100 100 10 7.00 

SHGs 55 55 20 8.00 

WCs 12 12 5 5.00 

GPs 7 7 1 0.88 

Community 10,000 1500 10 3.00 

Others 

(Pl. specify)


Total 31.88 

Table no.46: Information, education and Communication Activities: 

S. No. Activity Executing agency Estimated expenditure (Rs.) 

Agriculture Extension KVK 2.00 

Outcome 

(may quantify, wherever possible)


BUDGET 

Table no. 47: Budget at a glance for the project 

Sl no Budget component Cost requirement 

Administrative costs 63.75 

Monitoring 6.37 

Evaluation 6.38 

Entry Point activity 25.5 

Institution and Capacity Building 31.88 

Detailed Project Report 6.37 

Watershed Development Works 318.76 

Livelihood activities for asset less 63.75 

Production systems and micro-enterprises 82.88 

Consolidation phase 31.87 

TOTAL 637.51 

Table no. 48: Village wise- component wise budget available under IWMP 

Sl 

Village 

Activity 

no 

EPA 

Institution 

DPR 

Watershed 

Livelihood 

Production 

Consolidation 

Total 

and CB 

development 

for asset less 

system and 

Work 

Microenterprises


Dedkadi 2.12 2.65 0.53 26.50 5.30 6.89 2.65 

Devliya 3.94 4.92 0.98 49.20 9.80 12.80 4.92 

Langala 5.25 6.57 1.31 65.66 13.13 17.08 6.57 

Limada 8.32 10.4 2.08 104.00 20.80 27.04 10.4 

Ranghola 5.87 7.34 1.47 73.4 14.68 19.08 7.34 

Total 25.5 31.88 6.37 318.76 63.75 82.88 31.88 

Table no. 49: Village wise gap in funds requirement 

Sl 

No 

Village Total cost requirement Total funds available 

under IWMP 

Gap in funds 

requirement 

1 Limbada 241.42 207.98 33.44 

2 Ranghola 187.29 146.81 40.48 

3 Langala 160.17 131.33 28.84 

4 Devaliya 121.35 98.40 22.95 

5 Dedakadi 65.59 52.99 12.60 

Total 779.47 637.51 138.31


S. No. Village 

Limbada 

Ranghola 

Table no.50: Details of Convergence of IWMP with other Schemes 

Fund made available Scheme with which 

Level at which 

Reference no. of 

Activity to be carried to IWMP due to convergence took 

decision for 

activity/ task/ 

out 

convergence (Rs. in 

place 

convergence was 

structure in DPR 

lakh) 

taken 

Rain Water 

MGNREGA Watershed Work 

5.00 

Harvesting Structure 

Phase 

Village Level 

Rain Water 

People’s Watershed Work 

10.00 


Contribution 

Phase 

Village Level 



contribution 

Phase 

Village Level 

Land Levelling 3.95 


Phase 

Taluka Level 



contribution 

Phase 

Drip Irrigation 0.50 GGRC Production System State Level 

Total 33.44 

Rain Water 


10.00 


contribution 

Phase 

Village Level 

Rain Water 


5.00 


Phase 



contribution 

Phase 

Village Level


Langala 

Field Bund 6.00 


Phase 

Drip Irrigation 5.00 GGRC Production System 


NREGA 

Watershed Work 

Phase 

Field outlet 1.5 


contribution 

Phase 

Afforestation 0.43 

Forest Dept. Watershed Work 

Phase 

Total 40.48 

Rain Water 


10.00 


Contribution 

Phase 

Rain Water 


5.00 


Phase 



contribution 

Phase 


NREGA 


Phase 

Field outlet 1.5 


contribution 

Phase 


Forest Dept. Watershed Work 

Phase 

Cattle Camp 1.43 Animal Husbandry Watershed Work


Devaliya 

Dedakadi 

Dept 

Phase 

Mandap Service 0.32 SGSY Production System 

Drip Irrigation 2.00 GGRC Production System 

Rain Water 


8.00 


contribution 

Phase 

Rain Water 


4.00 


Phase 



contribution 

Phase 

Farm Pond 1.00 


Phase 

Drip Irrigation 1.21 

GGRC 


Phase 

Field Bund 1.00 


Phase 



Phase 


Forest 


Phase 

Total 22.95 

Rain Water 


3.00 


Phase 

Rain Water 2.00 People’s Watershed Work


Harvesting Structure Contribution Phase 

Dedakadi 

Forest 



Phase 

Village Pond 3.00 


Phase 



Phase 

Earth Work 2.60 


Phase 

Total 12.60 

Total 138.31 

Table no. 51: Public-Private Partnership in the IWMP projects 

S. No. 

Name of Private 

Sector Partner 

Agency 

a)MoU 

Type of agreement signed 

c) Any other 

b)Contract 

(pl. specify) 

Financial contribution 

Private 

IWMP 

sector 

Partnership 

Interventions 

Expected 

Outcomes 

Comments 

N.A.


OUTCOMES 

The village already get benefit of MNREGA. However IWMP project have special fund allocation for assetless people as well as micro enterprise & 

production system, which enable village community towards sustainable source of income i.e. self employment. The project will not only ensure 

employment but also promote microenterprise which will create other source of income other than agriculture & also make agriculture more profitable. 

Priority will be given to weaker section of the society i.e. women, BPL & SC/ST. However no ST population resides in the project area. 

Table no. 52: Employment in Project area: 

S. NO. 

Wage employment 

Self employment 


No. of man days No. of beneficiaries No. of beneficiaries 

Villages 

SC ST Others Women Total SC ST Others Women Total SC ST Others* Women Total 

1 Limbada 8000 17500 14500 40000 220 - 380 380 980 55 - 22 154 231 

2 Ranghola 5800 15200 11000 32000 187 - 139 149 475 22 - 11 132 165 

3 Langala 5000 12000 10500 27500 121 - 175 193 489 22 - 11 121 154 

4 Devaliya 3700 9800 6500 20000 84 - 80 156 320 176 - 0 154 176 

5 Dedakadi 3200 - 3400 3000 9600 34 - 37 37 108 33 - 22 66 121 

* Asset Less villagers 

Table no. 53: Details of seasonal migration from Project area 

Sl. No. Names of villages No. of persons migrating No. of days per year of migration 

Pre-project Expected post project Pre-project Expected post project 

1 Limbada 1100 300 180 75 

2 Ranghola 1000 250 180 75 

3 Langala 250 100 180 75


4 Devaliya 500 150 365 75 

S. No. Names of Villages Sources Pre-Project level 

Expected Increase/decrease 

(Post- Project) 

5 Dedakadi 150 50 180 75 

Table no. 54: Details of average ground water table depth in the project areas (in meters)


1 Limbada Open wells/ Bore Well 45 +6 

2 Ranghola Open wells/ Bore Well 40 +5 

3 Langala Open wells/ Bore Well 40 +4 

4 Devaliya Open wells/ Bore Well 35 +4 

5 Dedakadi Open wells/ Bore Well 35 +4 

Table no. 55: Status of Drinking water 


Availability of drinking water 

S. No. Villages 

(no. of months in a year) 

Quality of drinking water 

Pre-project Expected Post project Pre-project Expected Post-project 

1 Limbada 6-7 12 Impure Potable 

2 Ranghola 6 12 Impure Potable 

3 Langala 8 12 Impure Potable 

4 Devaliya 9-10 12 Impure Potable 

5 Dedakadi 7-9 12 Impure Potable 

Comments


Table no. 56: Details of Kharif crop area and yield in the project areas 

Pre-project 

Expected Post-project 


Name of crops 

Area 

(ha) 

Average Yield (Qtl) per ha. 

Area 

(ha) 

Average Yield per ha 

(Qtl) 

Limbada 

Cotton 1327.00 1.80 995.0 2.7 

Ground Nut 214.00 2.40 250.0 2.88 

Ranghola 

Cotton 765.30 1.80 550.0 2.7 

Ground Nut 165.20 2.40 165.2 2.88 

Langala 

Cotton 795.80 1.80 650.0 2.7 

Ground Nut 127.50 2.40 127.50 2.88 

Devaliya 

Cotton 485.00 1.80 320.0 2.7 

Ground Nut 87.40 2.40 87.0 2.88 

Dedakadi Cotton 232.00 1.80 170 2.7 

Ground Nut 35.00 2.40 20.0 2.88 

Table no. 57: Area under horticulture 

S. No. Name of Village Existing area under horticulture (ha) 

Area under horticulture proposed to be covered 

through IWMP 

1 Limbada 0.00 30 Ha 

2 Ranghola 3.50 35 Ha


3 Langala 0.00 25 Ha 

4 Devaliya 0.00 20 Ha 

5 Dedakadi 0.00 5.00 Ha 

Table no. 58: Forest/vegetative cover 

S. No. Name of Village Existing area under tree cover (ha) Area under tree cover proposed 

1 Limbada 6.00 21.00 Ha 

2 Ranghola 0.00 5.00 Ha 

3 Langala 0.00 5.00 Ha 

4 Devaliya 0.00 5.00 Ha 

5 Dedakadi 3.50 10.00 Ha 

Table no. 59: Details of livestock in the project areas (for fluids please mention in liters, for solids please mention in kgs. and income in Rs.) 

S. No. Name of Village Type of Animal 

Pre-Project 

Expected Post-project 

No. Yield Income No. Yield Income 

Remarks 

Limbada Milch-animals 519 2345 48588 800 4000 140000 Considering 

Ranghola Milch-animals 1439 6504 134762 1600 8000 280000 inflation and 

Langala Milch-animals 820 3706 76788 950 4750 166250 increase in 

Devaliya Milch -animals 660 2983 61807 800 4000 140000 average milk 

Dedakadi Milch-animals 247 1117 23,000 375 1875 65,625 

production by 

10 %


Sustainable Agriculture: In the recent decades, there is an increasing demand of organic foods in the developed world. Organic farming is an important 

pillar of sustainable agriculture, which is beneficial for producers and consumers both. India has a great potential for organic farming using traditional 

wisdoms prevailing in the villages of India. In fact, a large section of Indian agriculture uses more or less organic method of farming using minimum level of 

chemical inputs. Promotion of organic farming in Cluster could prove beneficial to Farmers of the cluster 

Issues need to be addressed. 

Soil fertility A continuous fall in soil fertility is a major problem in many parts of Botad taluka as productivity is decreasing day by day. Sustainable 

agriculture improves fertility and soil structure and prevents erosion, so would be an answer to this problem. 

Water Irrigation is the biggest consumer of fresh water, and fertilizer and pesticides contaminate both surface- and groundwater. Sustainable agriculture 

increases the organic matter content of the topsoil, so raising its ability to retain and store water that falls as rain. 

No. 60: Backward-Forward linkages 

S. No. Project Type of Marketing Facility Pre-project (no.) During the project (no.) Post-project (no.) 

Backward linkages For Animal Husbandry 

Fodder Development 1 2 

Animal feed Storage 1 1 

Cattle Camp 5 0 

Financial Support for Animal Husbandry 1 1 

Forward Linkages for Animal Husbandry 

Milk Production 1 2 

Milk Collection Centre 1 1 

Milk Processing 1 1


Market Linkage 1 1 

Backward Linkage For Agriculture 

Vermi Compost 10 20 

Nurseries 1 2 

Farm Machineries 3 4 

Water supply 

Seed Supply 1 

Credit institutions 1 2 

Forward linkages For Agriculture 

Harvesting/threshing machinery 2 2 

Agro and other Industries 2 4 

Market Link up 2 2


Annexure 

Improved Crematoria Design 

As per the Hindu tradition after death the mortal remains of a human are confined to the holy fire "The Agni". Traditionally wood and dung cakes are 

used to cremate the dead body. In a traditional arrangement adopted for cremation normally about 250 to 300 kilos of wood besides a few kilos of dung 

cakes are consumed per dead body - meaning each dead body needs about 5 to 6 times its weight of wood for its cremation. As a result annually lakhs of tons 

of wood is destroyed for this inevitable activity. It is estimated that in Gujarat annually over 2 lakhs trees are being cut down for providing wood for 

cremation alone. 

The Improved Crematoria developed in Gujarat exhibited a potential of saving about 40 to 50% of wood consumed for cremation. The activity, which 

earlier required about 250 to 300 kilos, could now be accomplished with 140 to 160 kilos only. Hence a saving of 100 to 150 kilos of wood per cremation. 

The solution is a simple pre-fabricated cremation bed against the traditional method in which the pyre is set directly on the floor. 

PROMOTION OF EFFICIENT WOOD CREMATORIA IN GUJARAT 

The Forest Department, Govt. of Gujarat and Gujarat Energy Development Agency have been promoting use of improved designs of Wood-based Efficient 

Crematoria in Gujarat since last two decades. The two designs are pre-fabricated cradle-like iron structures designed to provide proper aeration for efficient 

combustion. 

DESIGN & TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION 

The design being propagated by GEDA is built up of cast iron and mild-steel components and weighs about 430 kilos. The Forest design is fully caste 

weighing around 750 to 800 kilos.


As shown in the sketch it is a cast iron cradle made up of cast iron (CI) sidebars and fire bars, supported by a heavy mild-steel (MS) frame structure. The 

sidebars and fire bars are secured by heady duty bolts & nuts. The overall dimension of the crematoria is 1950 mm X 905 mm X 820 mm. Weight of cast iron 

components is used is about 325 to 330 kilos and that of mild-steel is about 100 to 110 kilos. The total structure is laid on a PCC floor and can be either 

grouted or secured using foundation bolts. The components of the crematoria are as listed below: 

1.Side bars/plates CI 12 nos. 

2.Fire bar/plates CI 8 nos. 

3.Vertical Supports MS 6 nos. 

4.Horizon. Supports MS 2 nos. 

5.Nut/bolt sets MS 88 nos.


Fig. 1. Sketch of Improved Wood-based Crematoria promoted by GEDA. 

Water-saving and Productivity Gains through Drip Irrigation 


Water 

Yield (Ton/ha) 

Water 

Yield 

Water use 

crops 

consumption 

saving 

increas 

efficiency$ 

(mm/ha) 

over 

e over 

FMI 

FMI


(%) (%) 

Fruit Crops 

Surface 

Irrigati 

on 

Drip 

Irrigati 

on 

Surface 

Irrigati 

on 

Drip 

Irrigati 

on 

FMI 

DMI 

Cotton 856 302 2.60 3.26 60 25 329.23 92.64 

Groundnut 500 300 1.71 2.84 40 66 292.40 105.63 

Drip Irrigation Economic Comparison 

S. No Particulars Papaya 

Drip 

Surface 

1 Spacing (Meter) 2.4 x 1.8 2.4 x 1.8 

2 Cost of Drip System (Rs/ha.)* 40000 

A Depreciation (Rs/ha) 6800 

B Interest @ 13% (Rs/ha) 2400 

C Repair and Maintenance (Rs/ha) 2000 

D Total (Rs/ha) 11200 

3 Cost of cultivation (Rs/ha) 30,000 37500 

4 Seasonal total cost (3+2D) (Rs/ha) 41,200 37,500 

5 Water used (L/day/plant) 15 25 

6 Yield of produce 

a Latex (Kg/ha) 1375 1250 

b Fruits (Tons/ha) 150 100 

7 Selling Price 

a Latex (Kg/ha) 50 50


b Fruits (Tons/ha) 500 500 

8 Income from Produce (6*7) (Rs/ha) 143750 112500 

9 Net seasonal income (8-4) (Rs/ha) 102,550 75,000 

10 Additional area cultivated due to saving of water (ha) 1 

11 Additional expenditure due to additional area (4*10) (Rs/ha) 41200 

12 Actual Extra income due to drip 31250 

13 Additional income due to additional area (8*10) (Rs/ha) 168750 

14 Additional net income (13+12-11) (Rs/ha) 158800 

15 Gross cost of production (4+11) (Rs/ha) 41200 37500 

16 Gross Income (8+12)/2 (Rs/ha) 158800 112000 

17 B C Ratio (16/15) 3.85 2.99 

18 

Net extra income due to drip irrigation over conventional method (Rs/ha) 

((13+9drip)-9surface) 52550


Backward & Forward Linkages for IWMP – 6 

Livelihood Interventions & Production support System 

Animal Fodder Development 

Animal Husbandry 

Cattle Camp 

Milk 

Cow Dung 

Milk Co-Operative Vermi Compost Gobar Gas 

Milk Processing 

Nursery 

Farming 

Land Preparation 

Farm Mechanization 

Organic Farming 

Horticultural Plants 

Sweets Making Tutti Fruity Making/ Processing Selling


Making Of Tuti frutti for Papaya. 

- Recipe 

- Harvest Papaya before complete ripening 

- Remove peel & seeds out of it. 

- Make uniform small pieces ( 1 x 1 x 1 cm) 

- Dip them in to sugar solution for attest 

- One hour. 

- Dry it in Sun light. 

- After drying make it colorful by using edible food color. 

- Now Tutti-frutti is ready to use. 

Uses 

- It is used in ice cream making, sweets, Bakery item etc. 

- It is also used at pan Parlors. 

Feasible Market 

- Retailing at Pan parlors. 

- Wholesaling at taluka or District Place. 

- Link up with Bakery, ice cream maker.

DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (DPR) DWDU – Bhavnagar

detailed project report - Commissionerate of Rural Development ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?