23.06.2014 Views

Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska

Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska

Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

assessment of fees under § 25-824. There, it was stated that the offending party<br />

had demonstrated a disdain for common law and common sense.<br />

[from the dissent:] The term "ex rel.", or ex relatione, is defined as "[l]egal<br />

proceedings which are instituted by the attorney general (or other proper person) in<br />

the name and behalf of the state, but on the information and at the instigation of an<br />

individual who has a private interest in the matter...." Black's Law Dictionary 582 (6th<br />

ed. 1990).<br />

Note: In civil proceedings where paternity is an issue, most states provide that there must be<br />

corroboration to support the mother’s testimony that the respondent is the father. Other cases<br />

addressing the need for corroboration in the testimony as to paternity include:<br />

State ex rel. Klostermeier v. Klostermeier, 161 Neb. 247, 72 N.W.2d 848 (1955)<br />

Lockman v. Fulton, 162 Neb. 439, 76 N.W.2d 452 (1956)<br />

Wade v. Hicks, 191 Neb. 847, 218 N.W.2d 222 (1974)<br />

State on behalf of Cooper v. Harmon, 2 Neb. App. 612, 512 N.W.2d 656 (1994)<br />

Perkins v. Perkins, 198 Neb. 401, 253 N.W.2d 42 (1977)<br />

The presumption favoring legitimacy of children may only be rebutted by clear and<br />

convincing evidence beyond the testimony of husband or wife denying child’s<br />

legitimacy.<br />

Snay v. Snarr, 195 Neb. 375, 238 N.W.2d 234 (1976)<br />

In a paternity proceeding, only a preponderance of evidence is necessary to<br />

sustain a verdict.<br />

Snodgrass v. Snodgrass, 241 Neb. 43, 486 N.W.2d 215 (1992)<br />

When the trial court in the original decree determined paternity, and no appeal<br />

was taken, that determination is final.<br />

Appellant chose not to assert that the older child was not his at any time until after<br />

appellant had been determined to be in contempt. Paternity was determined by the<br />

court in the original decree herein. That determination was not appealed and is,<br />

therefore, final. Appellant raises no new facts or circumstances which require the<br />

district court to reopen the decree.<br />

State on behalf of Cooper v. Harmon, 2 Neb. App. 612, 512 N.W.2d 656 (1994)<br />

Relevant evidence of paternity includes evidence of sexual intercourse between the<br />

mother and alleged father at any possible time of conception and the results of blood<br />

testing. Corroboration means independent evidence which tends to strengthen or<br />

otherwise to confirm the testimony of the mother of the child whose paternity is in<br />

issue.<br />

State on behalf of Dady v. Snelling, 10 Neb. App. 740, 637 N.W.2d 906 (2001)<br />

Under § 43-1415(3), evidence of genetic testing results can be introduced without<br />

foundational testimony or other proof of authenticity or accuracy in regard to the<br />

testing itself, unless there is a written request for personal testimony of the expert at<br />

least 30 days prior to trial.<br />

- 158 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!