Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska
Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska
Child Support Enforcement - Sarpy County Nebraska
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
What God -- or the State -- has lawfully joined will sooner or later be subject to the<br />
winds of time, and many marriages end up cast like boats upon the rocks of life. That is<br />
where we as CSE offices have come in to work our magic. There is no reason to expect that<br />
same sex couples will be any better at the marriage thing then their straight cousins, who<br />
after all have had a millennia to work on marriage but still can’t seem to get it right. Same<br />
sex families have a lower instance of raising children then heterosexual ones, but still a fair<br />
number of children are adopted into or born into these relationships. As marriages with<br />
children fail, the parties will look to the courts for assistance, and then to us. Possibly they<br />
will look to us first, in cases of separation where state assistance is involved. Questions will<br />
immediately be raised. Can we assist same sex parents in securing an award of support<br />
from their marital ex-partner? How will we address via UIFSA court orders for support<br />
from same sex relationships? Already in states where same sex marriage is not authorized<br />
divorces between same sex couples have been granted. These will be finding their way to<br />
your desk in the coming months and years.<br />
At present, the Federal “Defense of Marriage Act” (DOMA) remains on the books,<br />
although the Obama Administration has signaled that the act is likely unconstitutional, and<br />
will not defend it further in court. It reads in relevant part:<br />
No State, territory, or possession of the United States, or Indian tribe, shall be<br />
required to give effect to any public act, record, or judicial proceeding of any<br />
other State, territory, possession, or tribe respecting a relationship between<br />
persons of the same sex that is treated as a marriage under the laws of such<br />
other State, territory, possession, or tribe, or a right or claim arising from such<br />
relationship.<br />
The Obama Administration and others believe that DOMA runs afoul of Article IV,<br />
section 1 of the Federal Constitution, the Full Faith and Credit Clause, which reads:<br />
Full Faith and Credit shall be given in each State to the public Acts, Records, and<br />
judicial Proceedings of every other State; And the Congress may by general Laws<br />
prescribe the Manner in which such Acts, Records and Proceedings shall be<br />
proved, and the Effect thereof.<br />
A federal court in Massachusetts in 2010 held DOMA unconstitutional. In May 2012 a<br />
separate Federal Circuit Court of Appeals in Massachusetts also ruled unanimously that<br />
DOMA violates the federal civil rights of married gays and lesbians. Two other federal<br />
courts in California have reached the same conclusion. However, only the US Supreme<br />
Court can finally determine the constitutionality of a federal law. A DOMA case has been<br />
accepted for hearing by the US Supreme Court, and is on the court’s spring 2013 calendar.<br />
An interesting report of the Congressional Research Service of the Library of<br />
Congress on this general issue may be viewed at<br />
http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/crs/rl31994.pdf<br />
† A total of 10 states, two tribes (the Coquille Indian Tribe in Oregon and the<br />
Suquamish Tribe in Washington State) plus the District of Columbia have approved same<br />
sex marriage as of spring 2013. As of November 2012 this list includes:<br />
- 169 -