29.06.2014 Views

twrama 1990_final oc.. - AMA WA

twrama 1990_final oc.. - AMA WA

twrama 1990_final oc.. - AMA WA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

OPINION<br />

systems will improve what’s there now. This is cold comfort<br />

considering the critical timeline begins in less than three months<br />

for the new e-PIP entitlements, of which there are five. The<br />

progressive tiers have gone and soon it’s all in or all out – i.e. you<br />

comply with all five components including the PCEHR or none of<br />

them.<br />

This potentially means a loss of all the e-PIP money to practices<br />

should you not take up the PCEHR, up to the $50,000/practice<br />

ceiling payment. And all while the MDOs are still advising of<br />

the risks, the potential for massive fines, the medico-legal liability<br />

arising from acting on incomplete information or the penalties<br />

if you access a patient’s PCEHR without them physically in the<br />

room, however practical or well intentioned.<br />

It is this government’s appalling ‘take a stick to GPs’ approach<br />

which leaves so many of us angry, bewildered and in an ethical<br />

and practical bind. As if it is not enough that there will be no<br />

dedicated funding for GPs to do this work (let alone how on earth<br />

we will absorb the additional workload it will generate), do not be<br />

ambushed by Minister Plibersek’s now famously empty August<br />

announcement on MBS Fees for PCEHR, which was positively<br />

media-promoted and falsely praised as if it were some sort of a win<br />

for the profession. Boll<strong>oc</strong>ks! It was nothing, merely that if you have<br />

a Level B consultation of already 17 minutes and you spend five<br />

minutes on the patient’s PCEHR, it will be allowed to become a<br />

Level C, so there may be a few extra dollars in it for you, nothing<br />

more.<br />

The fact is this Labor Government is struggling for political<br />

wins as far as it sees the forthcoming election. Despite their<br />

multiplicity of failures including the failed Health Reforms, Pink<br />

Batts and education among other issues, Australians are still fairly<br />

evenly divided on their policy achievements, even the Immigration<br />

debacle.<br />

But they are so fearful of the fallout of the Carbon and Mineral<br />

Rents Resources Taxes, they have utterly “tied themselves to<br />

the mast” on the National Electronic Health Record. Originally<br />

meant to be launched on 1 July 1 this year amid great fanfare, it<br />

infamously and very belatedly limped in with no real kudos and<br />

little media coverage ensuring that as few Australians as possible<br />

knew about it – instead leaving it largely promoted face to face<br />

through Medicare offices and mail outs. But I know in the run<br />

up to the election, the PCEHR will be very heavily promoted as<br />

a glowing success in an attempt to curry political favour with the<br />

electorate. And we GPs are the bunnies who are taking the fall<br />

over this no-carrots and all-stick approach.<br />

By the time you are reading this, the pitiful rise in the 1<br />

November MBS Fees List would have been released and all GPs<br />

and practices would have received a letter<br />

from the Department about the<br />

new eligibility requirements<br />

for the PIP e-Health<br />

Incentive, which represent<br />

a staggering rise in<br />

requirements for many I heard no fewer than<br />

practices. The first four<br />

six times: ‘We will<br />

of these requirements<br />

must be compulsorily make it better over the<br />

met by 1 February 2013<br />

years to come’…This is<br />

• Integrate health<br />

care identifiers into cold comfort<br />

electronic practice<br />

records<br />

• Ensure secure messaging<br />

capability<br />

• Achieve data records and clinical coding<br />

• Electronic transfer of prescriptions (e-Rx and Medisecure will<br />

be interoperable by January)<br />

• Personally controlled electronic health record system<br />

(by 1 May 2013)<br />

I am sure some practices will walk from the e-PIP; many I know<br />

remain undecided. Perhaps it will spur a huge shift away from<br />

bulk-billing as practices recoup the losses through fee-for-service<br />

and decouple themselves from bl<strong>oc</strong>k payments. I do know, it is a<br />

hell of a shabby way to treat GPs and as <strong>AMA</strong> (<strong>WA</strong>) President<br />

Richard Choong said, the government has not yet thrown enough<br />

money at this to walk away from it!<br />

It is a fight that I also took to the recent Federal GP Council in<br />

Canberra – to see if getting mad also meant getting some ‘Winds<br />

of Change’. Keep watching this space. ■<br />

Nissan Maxima, Murano<br />

and 370Z Coupe.<br />

4.9% Business<br />

Finance.<br />

164 Leach Hwy, Melville<br />

9330 6666 www.magicnissan.com.au<br />

DL0491<br />

October MEDICUS 19

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!