twrama 1990_final oc.. - AMA WA
twrama 1990_final oc.. - AMA WA
twrama 1990_final oc.. - AMA WA
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
OPINION<br />
systems will improve what’s there now. This is cold comfort<br />
considering the critical timeline begins in less than three months<br />
for the new e-PIP entitlements, of which there are five. The<br />
progressive tiers have gone and soon it’s all in or all out – i.e. you<br />
comply with all five components including the PCEHR or none of<br />
them.<br />
This potentially means a loss of all the e-PIP money to practices<br />
should you not take up the PCEHR, up to the $50,000/practice<br />
ceiling payment. And all while the MDOs are still advising of<br />
the risks, the potential for massive fines, the medico-legal liability<br />
arising from acting on incomplete information or the penalties<br />
if you access a patient’s PCEHR without them physically in the<br />
room, however practical or well intentioned.<br />
It is this government’s appalling ‘take a stick to GPs’ approach<br />
which leaves so many of us angry, bewildered and in an ethical<br />
and practical bind. As if it is not enough that there will be no<br />
dedicated funding for GPs to do this work (let alone how on earth<br />
we will absorb the additional workload it will generate), do not be<br />
ambushed by Minister Plibersek’s now famously empty August<br />
announcement on MBS Fees for PCEHR, which was positively<br />
media-promoted and falsely praised as if it were some sort of a win<br />
for the profession. Boll<strong>oc</strong>ks! It was nothing, merely that if you have<br />
a Level B consultation of already 17 minutes and you spend five<br />
minutes on the patient’s PCEHR, it will be allowed to become a<br />
Level C, so there may be a few extra dollars in it for you, nothing<br />
more.<br />
The fact is this Labor Government is struggling for political<br />
wins as far as it sees the forthcoming election. Despite their<br />
multiplicity of failures including the failed Health Reforms, Pink<br />
Batts and education among other issues, Australians are still fairly<br />
evenly divided on their policy achievements, even the Immigration<br />
debacle.<br />
But they are so fearful of the fallout of the Carbon and Mineral<br />
Rents Resources Taxes, they have utterly “tied themselves to<br />
the mast” on the National Electronic Health Record. Originally<br />
meant to be launched on 1 July 1 this year amid great fanfare, it<br />
infamously and very belatedly limped in with no real kudos and<br />
little media coverage ensuring that as few Australians as possible<br />
knew about it – instead leaving it largely promoted face to face<br />
through Medicare offices and mail outs. But I know in the run<br />
up to the election, the PCEHR will be very heavily promoted as<br />
a glowing success in an attempt to curry political favour with the<br />
electorate. And we GPs are the bunnies who are taking the fall<br />
over this no-carrots and all-stick approach.<br />
By the time you are reading this, the pitiful rise in the 1<br />
November MBS Fees List would have been released and all GPs<br />
and practices would have received a letter<br />
from the Department about the<br />
new eligibility requirements<br />
for the PIP e-Health<br />
Incentive, which represent<br />
a staggering rise in<br />
requirements for many I heard no fewer than<br />
practices. The first four<br />
six times: ‘We will<br />
of these requirements<br />
must be compulsorily make it better over the<br />
met by 1 February 2013<br />
years to come’…This is<br />
• Integrate health<br />
care identifiers into cold comfort<br />
electronic practice<br />
records<br />
• Ensure secure messaging<br />
capability<br />
• Achieve data records and clinical coding<br />
• Electronic transfer of prescriptions (e-Rx and Medisecure will<br />
be interoperable by January)<br />
• Personally controlled electronic health record system<br />
(by 1 May 2013)<br />
I am sure some practices will walk from the e-PIP; many I know<br />
remain undecided. Perhaps it will spur a huge shift away from<br />
bulk-billing as practices recoup the losses through fee-for-service<br />
and decouple themselves from bl<strong>oc</strong>k payments. I do know, it is a<br />
hell of a shabby way to treat GPs and as <strong>AMA</strong> (<strong>WA</strong>) President<br />
Richard Choong said, the government has not yet thrown enough<br />
money at this to walk away from it!<br />
It is a fight that I also took to the recent Federal GP Council in<br />
Canberra – to see if getting mad also meant getting some ‘Winds<br />
of Change’. Keep watching this space. ■<br />
Nissan Maxima, Murano<br />
and 370Z Coupe.<br />
4.9% Business<br />
Finance.<br />
164 Leach Hwy, Melville<br />
9330 6666 www.magicnissan.com.au<br />
DL0491<br />
October MEDICUS 19