29.06.2014 Views

Local Hazard Mitigation Plan.pdf - Sonoma County Water Agency ...

Local Hazard Mitigation Plan.pdf - Sonoma County Water Agency ...

Local Hazard Mitigation Plan.pdf - Sonoma County Water Agency ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

strap joints. Most river and stream crossings include concrete encasement over some or most of<br />

the pipeline between the banks of the river or stream.<br />

Major hazards to the pipeline system include earthquakes, floods and landslides, with the<br />

earthquakes and earthquake induced hazards such as liquefaction, surface fault rupture, lateral<br />

spread and strong ground shaking being the most significant.<br />

In general, buried pipelines, such as the SCWA’s aqueducts, are designed for internal pressure<br />

with limited consideration to large relative displacements of ground along its length. Such<br />

pipelines are typically designed with bell and spigot type connections (also known as segmented<br />

pipelines) and do not perform well when subjected to ground failure resulting from earthquakes,<br />

floods and landslides. In the 1964 Anchorage, Alaska earthquake more than 100 water pipe<br />

breaks were reported. In 1971 San Fernando earthquake, the City of San Fernando temporarily<br />

lost water, gas and sewage services due to liquefaction induced lateral spreading along the<br />

eastern and western shores of Upper Van Norman reservoir. For relatively small ground<br />

displacements associated with earthquake ground shaking, the pipelines perform reasonably well<br />

with certain amounts of random damage that can usually be handled as part of emergency repairs<br />

following an earthquake.<br />

The <strong>Agency</strong>’s pipelines cross many locations where they may be subjected to ground<br />

deformation. The most obvious location is the Rodgers Creek fault crossing of the Santa Rosa<br />

aqueduct. Surface fault rupture displacement of several feet is expected during a major<br />

earthquake on the fault, which the pipeline is not designed for. In addition, the <strong>Agency</strong>’s<br />

<strong>Sonoma</strong> aqueduct and the Oakmont pipelines cross the Bennett Valley fault and will likely fail in<br />

a surface rupturing event on this fault. Other vulnerable locations include the Russian River<br />

crossing of the Russian River Cotati intertie and multiple stream crossings as shown in Figure<br />

xx. Depending upon the geometry of the stream bank and the potential for liquefaction, these<br />

locations could have large lateral spread displacements and consequently the pipelines may fail.<br />

The <strong>Sonoma</strong> aqueduct is also vulnerable to damage from debris impact in a high flood scenario<br />

at three locations where the pipeline is suspended from bridges across creeks.<br />

4.1.4 Storage Facilities<br />

The <strong>Agency</strong> has a total of 17 flat bottom steel tanks located at eight independent sites. Out of the<br />

17 tanks, seven are anchored while the other 10 are unanchored. The tanks range in size from<br />

0.3 M.G. to 18 M.G. Most of the tanks have overconstrained piping connections that are<br />

potentially vulnerable to damage in an earthquake. Such piping connections consist of the pipe<br />

that is rigidly attached to the tank shell and restrained by burial near the tank or connection to an<br />

adjacent nearby tank. As a result, the piping is unable to accommodate movement of the tank as<br />

32 <strong>Local</strong> <strong>Hazard</strong> <strong>Mitigation</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> 1-18-08.doc

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!