Local Hazard Mitigation Plan.pdf - Sonoma County Water Agency ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

grants program (HMGP), Agency’s maintenance budget and a proposed reliability surcharge within the Agency’s rate structure. Since 2003, FEMA has provided close to $540 million in PDM grants to eligible projects. Additional funding from FEMA is available following a Federal disaster declaration as part of its HMGP. Depending on the level of funding available, the Agency plans to implement the top six first tier objectives in 4 to 10 years following the adoption of this plan with the remainder of the first tier objectives completed within the next 15 to 25 years. 44 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 1-18-08.doc
7.0 PLAN MAINTENANCE The Agency’s commitment to reducing its hazard vulnerability and improving the reliability of its system is demonstrated by the fact that the Agency on its own initiative undertook a comprehensive multi-hazard reliability improvement program. The Agency recognizes that this commitment can only be met through a dedicated effort. Development of the Hazard Mitigation Plan is part of this effort. In meeting the requirements of the DMA2000, the Agency plans to update the Hazard Mitigation Plan every five years or if new information becomes available, priorities for implementation change or an actual hazard event occurs that may prompt an update to the plan sooner than five years. 7.1 MONITORING EVALUATING AND UPDATING THE PLAN The Agency will keep the plan “alive” through constant monitoring of the plan goals and objectives. The high priority mitigation actions are being included in the Agency’s CIP. Because of the involvement of the Agency’s Department heads of Planning, Operations, Maintenance and Capital Improvements in the development of the plan, the entire executive management of the Agency is committed to implement the goals and objectives of the plan. The Agency will incorporate the hazard mitigation plan in its yearly CIP planning process to monitor progress towards the goals of the hazard mitigation plan. To further facilitate this process, the Agency’s Capital Projects Manager has been identified as the person responsible for monitoring and updating the hazard mitigation plan. As required by DMA2000, this plan will be updated every five years. The Agency will also update the plan if there is a significant change in the basic assumptions, for example a major hazard event that highlights vulnerabilities in the system not anticipated at the present time. 7.2 CONTINUED PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT The Agency, with its decision to incorporate the hazard mitigation plan in its yearly CIP planning process, has ensured continued public involvement in this plan. The CIP approval is an open public process. As part of the approval process the CIP is presented to the Agency’s Board of Supervisors in an open public meeting and by virtue of this, progress towards achieving Agency’s goals and objectives identified in the hazard mitigation plan will also be open for public review and comment. Further, the Agency is contractually obligated to meet on a regular basis with two advisory committees. The Water Advisory Committee (WAC) and the Technical Advisory Committee(TAC) meet quarterly and monthly respectively. The WAC is made up of members 45 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 1-18-08.doc
Page 2 and 3: TABLE OF CONTENTS ii Page 1.0 INTRO
Page 4 and 5: TABLES Table 1 Table 2 Table 3 Tabl
Page 6 and 7: contractors maintain some local sou
Page 8 and 9: 1.3.1 Water System Reliability Stud
Page 10 and 11: • The draft hazard mitigation pla
Page 12 and 13: • Pumping facilities - includes 8
Page 14 and 15: The Agency provides maintenance ser
Page 16 and 17: 3.1 EARTHQUAKE HAZARD 3.0 HAZARD AS
Page 18 and 19: ooster stations. The fault is well
Page 20 and 21: the County are exposed to long dura
Page 22 and 23: 1 February 18, 1986 48.56 2 January
Page 24 and 25: fluids within the soil. These facto
Page 26 and 27: Table 3 shows some of the major fir
Page 28 and 29: prior to 1900 are minimal. Multi-ye
Page 30 and 31: Blowing Dust November 2, 1994 5:21
Page 32 and 33: Risk to the Agency’s facilities f
Page 34 and 35: 4.1.1 Russian River System The prim
Page 36 and 37: strap joints. Most river and stream
Page 38 and 39: 4.1.7 Supplementary Water Sources I
Page 40 and 41: • Facilities at the Sea Ranch San
Page 42 and 43: Based on the insights obtained from
Page 44 and 45: Objective 1.6: Improve the Agency
Page 46 and 47: 6.0 IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY For the
Page 50 and 51: of the elected Councils and Boards
Page 52 and 53: 18 Local Hazard Mitigation Planning
Page 54 and 55: 43 The Tornado Project http://www.t
Page 56 and 57: S. No Name of the File Year 13. Spe
Page 58 and 59: S. No Name of the File Year 41 Spec
Page 60 and 61: S. No Title Consultant Date 16 17 G
Page 62 and 63: RUSSIAN R = Booster Station !( C
Page 64 and 65: Wohler and Mirabel Production Facil
Page 66 and 67: Source: USGS - http://quake.wr.usgs
Page 69 and 70: Wohler Intertie
Page 71 and 72: Wohler Intertie
Page 73 and 74: ocatio odamagig ladslide.
Page 75 and 76: Wohler Intertie Cotat
Page 77 and 78: Wohler Intertie Cotat
Page 79 and 80: Geographic distriutio otoradoes ase
Page 81 and 82: lue ay reek olemaalley reek ³ !( !
Page 83 and 84: lue ay reek olemaalley reek ³ !( !
Page 85: lue ay reek olemaalley reek ³ !( !
Page 89: ³ !( !( !( !( !( 0 S S

Local Hazard Mitigation Plan.pdf - Sonoma County Water Agency ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?