30.06.2014 Views

SAN DIEGO DISTRICT ATTORNEY The Fourth Amendment and ...

SAN DIEGO DISTRICT ATTORNEY The Fourth Amendment and ...

SAN DIEGO DISTRICT ATTORNEY The Fourth Amendment and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Checkpoint to “thwart an imminent terrorist attack or to<br />

catch a dangerous criminal who is likely to flee by way of<br />

a particular route.” (see below; City of Indianapolis v.<br />

Edmond, infra.)<br />

Checkpoints set up for the purpose of collecting<br />

information from the public concerning a prior criminal act<br />

(i.e., a fatal “hit <strong>and</strong> run” in this case), when set up at the<br />

location of the prior criminal act, <strong>and</strong> exactly one week<br />

after it occurred. Such a roadblock was differentiated from<br />

the attempt to discovery “ordinary criminal wrongdoing,”<br />

as condemned in Indianapolis v. Edmond, infra. (Illinois<br />

v. Lidster (2004) 540 U.S. 419 [157 L.Ed.2 nd 843].)<br />

An “information station” set up to provide park visitors<br />

with information concerning the rules of the park <strong>and</strong> be<br />

given a litter bag, where every vehicle was stopped.<br />

(United States v. Faulkner (9 th Cir. 2006) 450 F.3 rd 466.)<br />

A checkpoint set up for the purpose of preventing illegal<br />

hunting in a national park, justified by a legitimate concern<br />

for preservation of park wildlife, when confined to the park<br />

gate where visitors would expect to briefly stop anyway.<br />

(United States v. Fraire (9 th Cir. 2009) 575 F.3 rd 929.)<br />

Checkpoints may also have a dual-purpose, such as the<br />

interdiction of drugs (but see below) <strong>and</strong> enforcement of driver’s<br />

license <strong>and</strong> registration laws. (Merrett v. Moore (11 th Cir. 1995)<br />

58 F.3 rd 1547.)<br />

Checkpoints may be attended by more than one law enforcement<br />

agency, despite the different interests involved. (United States v.<br />

Barajas-Chavez (10 th Cir. 1999) 162 F.3 rd 1285, New Mexico DUI<br />

checkpoint with Border Patrol present in case the police discovered<br />

illegal aliens; United States v. Galindo-Gonzales (10 th Cir. 1998)<br />

142 F.3 rd 1217, aliens found at state driver’s license <strong>and</strong> vehicle<br />

registration roadblock.)<br />

V.C. § 2814.1: A County Board of Supervisors to<br />

authorized by statute to establish a combined vehicleinspection<br />

<strong>and</strong> sobriety-checkpoint program, to check for<br />

violations of V.C. §§ 27153 <strong>and</strong> 27153.5 (exhaust <strong>and</strong><br />

excessive smoke violations), V.C. § 23140 (person under<br />

the age of 21 driving with a blood-alcohol level of 0.05%<br />

© 2011 Robert C. Phillips. All rights reserved<br />

67

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!