30.06.2014 Views

SAN DIEGO DISTRICT ATTORNEY The Fourth Amendment and ...

SAN DIEGO DISTRICT ATTORNEY The Fourth Amendment and ...

SAN DIEGO DISTRICT ATTORNEY The Fourth Amendment and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

when the son did not pay rent, <strong>and</strong> there was no evidence of<br />

any agreement on the part of the parent not to enter the<br />

son’s room. (United States v. Rith (10 th Cir. 1999) 164<br />

F.3 rd 1323.)<br />

Father, with the apparent authority to allow police officers<br />

to search his entire residence, including the bedroom of his<br />

adult son, under circumstances where the father <strong>and</strong><br />

defendant son had apparent free access to each other’s<br />

room, validly authorized police to enter the son’s room.<br />

(People v. Oodham (2000) 81 Cal.App.4 th 1.)<br />

Query: If the adult child is paying rent <strong>and</strong> there is<br />

nothing else to suggest that the parents have free<br />

access to the child’s room, would not the l<strong>and</strong>lordtenant<br />

rules (See Civil Code §§ 789.3, 1954) be<br />

applicable?<br />

Parents have to have access to their minor child’s bedroom<br />

<strong>and</strong> the power to give consent to the search of the bedroom<br />

to the police in order to properly execute their duty of<br />

supervision <strong>and</strong> control over the child. “In the absence of<br />

evidence suggesting a parent has abdicated this role toward<br />

his or her child, police officers may reasonably conclude<br />

that a parent can validly consent to the search of a minor<br />

child's bedroom.” (In re D.C. (2010) 188 Cal.App.4 th 978.)<br />

<strong>The</strong> Court reaffirmed the California Supreme<br />

Court’s decision in In re Scott K., supra, noting that<br />

a minor may retain the right to exclude others from<br />

areas that are exclusive to the minor (a footlocker<br />

which was locked by the child). (In re D.C., supra,<br />

at pp. 987-988.)<br />

<strong>The</strong> Court also rejected the contrary rule of United<br />

States v. Whitfield (D.C. Cir. 1991) 291 U.S.<br />

App.D.C. 243 [939 F.2 nd 1071], which held that a<br />

parent does not have the authority to consent to the<br />

search of their adult son’s bedroom. (Id., at pp.<br />

986-987 .)<br />

Child: Whether or not a child may validly allow police into the<br />

family residence depends upon a determination whether, under the<br />

circumstances, it is reasonable to believe that the child had the<br />

authority to do so.<br />

© 2011 Robert C. Phillips. All rights reserved<br />

640

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!