30.06.2014 Views

SAN DIEGO DISTRICT ATTORNEY The Fourth Amendment and ...

SAN DIEGO DISTRICT ATTORNEY The Fourth Amendment and ...

SAN DIEGO DISTRICT ATTORNEY The Fourth Amendment and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

transporting <strong>and</strong> even booking a person for a<br />

fine-only offense, even if contrary to state<br />

law, is not a <strong>Fourth</strong> <strong>Amendment</strong> violation<br />

<strong>and</strong> thus does not subject the resulting<br />

evidence to suppression. However, the<br />

Court’s assumption is still valid that a<br />

“custodial arrest,” involving the<br />

transportation of the arrestee to a police<br />

station, is a necessary prerequisite to a<br />

lawful “search incident to arrest.”<br />

Transporting an arrested minor (even if for only a “status offense”<br />

such as a curfew violation or truancy), whether the minor is to be<br />

transported home (In re Demetrius A. (1989) 208 Cal.App.3 rd<br />

1245; prowling.), or to a police station (In re Charles C. (1999) 76<br />

Cal.App.4 th 420; curfew.), justifies a search incident to arrest. (See<br />

also In re Humberto O. (2000) 80 Cal.App.4 th 237; truancy.)<br />

In Humberto O., the juvenile was taken into custody for a<br />

truancy violation. However, it was noted in the decision<br />

that “the officers planned to cuff defendant’s h<strong>and</strong>s behind<br />

his back, put him in the patrol car, <strong>and</strong> transport him to<br />

school.” (pg. 240.) Education Code §§ 48264 <strong>and</strong> 48265<br />

require that the minor be transported to his parents or to<br />

school (among other choices). (pg. 241, fn. 2.) “<strong>The</strong><br />

limited nature of a section 48264 arrest requires that the<br />

minor be transported to school, as the officers here planned<br />

to do.” (pg. 244.) Searching the backpack he was carrying<br />

incident to this custodial arrest, was upheld.<br />

In In re Demetrius A., supra, without discussing the issue<br />

of the necessity for a transportation, it was noted that the<br />

minor was arrested for prowling <strong>and</strong> was going to be<br />

transported home. A search incident to such a custodial<br />

arrest was lawful.<br />

© 2011 Robert C. Phillips. All rights reserved<br />

In In re Charles C., supra, the minor was “taken into<br />

temporary custody” (i.e., “arrested,” see pg. 425, fn. 3.)<br />

<strong>and</strong> transported to the police station where he was searched<br />

“incident to the arrest.” <strong>The</strong> search was upheld, holding<br />

that it was irrelevant that the search was not conducted until<br />

after the transportation. Without further discussing the<br />

issue, the Court did note that citing (albeit for an infraction)<br />

at the scene <strong>and</strong> releasing the subject does not justify a<br />

search incident to such a citation. (pg. 424, fn. 2, citing<br />

Knowles v. Iowa (1998) 525 U.S. 113 [142 L.Ed.2 nd 492].)<br />

415

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!