01.07.2014 Views

14.4. Normal Curvature and the Second Fun- damental Form

14.4. Normal Curvature and the Second Fun- damental Form

14.4. Normal Curvature and the Second Fun- damental Form

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Looking at <strong>the</strong> formulae<br />

[α β; γ] = X αβ · X γ<br />

for <strong>the</strong> Christoffel symbols [α β; γ], it does not seem that <strong>the</strong>se<br />

symbols only depend on <strong>the</strong> first fun<strong>damental</strong> form, but in fact<br />

<strong>the</strong>y do!<br />

After some calculations, we have <strong>the</strong> following formulae showing<br />

that <strong>the</strong> Christoffel symbols only depend on <strong>the</strong> first fun<strong>damental</strong><br />

form:<br />

[1 1; 1] = 1 2 E u, [1 1; 2] = F u − 1 2 E v,<br />

[1 2; 1] = 1 2 E v, [1 2; 2] = 1 2 G u,<br />

[2 1; 1] = 1 2 E v, [2 1; 2] = 1 2 G u,<br />

[2 2; 1] = F v − 1 2 G u, [2 2; 2] = 1 2 G v.<br />

<strong>Normal</strong> <strong>Curvature</strong> . . .<br />

Geodesic <strong>Curvature</strong> . . .<br />

Home Page<br />

Title Page<br />

◭◭ ◮◮<br />

◭<br />

◮<br />

Page 709 of 711<br />

Go Back<br />

Full Screen<br />

Close<br />

Quit

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!