03.07.2014 Views

RIGHT-click here - Monitoring Times

RIGHT-click here - Monitoring Times

RIGHT-click here - Monitoring Times

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

BTHE WORLD OF DOMESTIC BROADCASTING<br />

ROADCAST BANDSCAN<br />

Doug<br />

Smith, W9WI<br />

dougsmith@monitoringtimes.com<br />

http://americanbandscan.blogspot.com<br />

Over-the-air TV in Canada: Going, going, gone?<br />

If you DX TV, <strong>here</strong>’s hoping you logged<br />

plenty of Canadian stations this summer – as<br />

many of the biggest signals are now gone...<br />

The deadline for the shutdown of analog TV<br />

in Canada was last July. Transmitters in Canada’s<br />

largest cities were to be converted to digital or<br />

else closed. Transmitters in rural areas don’t face<br />

a digital conversion mandate; they’re allowed to<br />

continue in analog indefinitely. The Canadian<br />

Broadcasting Corporation – CBC – obtained a<br />

one-year extension for some of its analog transmitters.<br />

That extension ran out at the end of last<br />

month. The CBC has told the government its<br />

remaining analog transmitters would be shut<br />

down at that time. This includes all CBC analog<br />

TV transmitters, not just the ones in markets<br />

mandated to convert to digital. The transmitters<br />

which have already been converted to digital, in<br />

the largest cities, will continue to operate.<br />

CBC’s TV licences are currently up for renewal.<br />

The transmitter closure plan was released<br />

as part of the renewal application, as answers to<br />

several questions the government asked about<br />

the CBC’s over-the-air plans. A few of the points<br />

raised:<br />

- Based on the ratings, the CBC believes 98% of<br />

Canadians either subscribe to cable/satellite<br />

(“BDUs”) or live within the coverage area of<br />

one of the transmitters which have already been<br />

converted to digital.<br />

- The CBC believes the closure of their analog<br />

transmitters will have no effect on advertising<br />

revenue.<br />

- It would cost $10,700,000 per year to maintain<br />

these transmitters.<br />

- It would cost at least $56,000,000 to replace the<br />

obsolete equipment.<br />

- Most of the affected transmitters are at least<br />

25 years old. Satellite gear used to deliver<br />

programming to these transmitters has been<br />

discontinued.<br />

- One of the satellite providers has offered free<br />

local-channel service to viewers who will lose<br />

over-the-air CBC signals.<br />

More than two dozen powerful VHF transmitters<br />

on channels 2-6 are affected; you’ll notice<br />

this during next summer’s skip season. Hundreds<br />

of smaller transmitters are also involved.<br />

❖ And in the U.S....<br />

The FCC has been taking steps to clear<br />

out TV stations, in anticipation of converting<br />

more spectrum from television to land mobile<br />

(i.e., “smartphones”). T<strong>here</strong> have been several<br />

developments in the last few months:<br />

Channel 51 is being cleared. Low-power<br />

Bruce, KA3UIH received this Illinois station on<br />

his car radio near Washington. (Doug Smith)<br />

TV stations have been urged to leave the channel;<br />

many have. In May, a number of applications<br />

appeared in the FCC TV database for stations<br />

with the mysterious callsign “WTB”. WTB is<br />

not, in fact, a callsign, but is the abbreviation<br />

for the FCC’s Wireless Telecommunications<br />

Bureau – the agency that regulates land-mobile<br />

radio. Each of the “WTB” applications precisely<br />

matches the technical parameters of an existing<br />

channel 51 full-power or Class A TV station.<br />

However, each of these applications specified a<br />

different channel. It certainly appears the FCC<br />

intends to order existing TV stations to leave<br />

channel 51 in favor of lower channels.<br />

The Commission has also announced plans<br />

for a “reverse auction” of TV spectrum. Stations<br />

will be asked how much the FCC would need to<br />

pay in order for the station to surrender its channel<br />

and go off the air. The Commission would<br />

buy out the least expensive channels, sell their<br />

spectrum to land-mobile operators, and use some<br />

of the proceeds to pay the bids. (Some of the rest<br />

would go to compensate other stations for the<br />

cost of channel moves; the rest would go to the<br />

U.S. Treasury.)<br />

Of course, any station that sells the FCC its<br />

channel is volunteering to go out of business!<br />

The Commission figures many stations will be<br />

reluctant to do so, so they’re offering another<br />

alternative: channel-sharing. The station that<br />

volunteers to sell its channel doesn’t go off the<br />

air – it agrees to share a channel with another<br />

station. For example, WJKL-TV offers to sell<br />

channel 44 to the government, and then share<br />

channel 38 with WMNO-TV. In return, WMNO-<br />

TV gets half the money the FCC paid for channel<br />

44.<br />

The technology has existed for years. Any of<br />

you who watch over-the-air TV has noticed “subchannels,”<br />

w<strong>here</strong> one broadcaster transmits two<br />

or more programs simultaneously on the same<br />

channel. Here in Nashville, WKRN transmits<br />

ABC programs on channel 2.1, and a continuous<br />

weather channel on 2.2. T<strong>here</strong> is nothing in the<br />

technology that requires both subchannels to be<br />

programmed by the same company. WMNO-TV<br />

could broadcast its existing religious programming<br />

on channel 39.1, while carrying WJKL-<br />

TV’s programming on channel 66.1 on the same<br />

transmitter.<br />

And while all of this proceeds, commentators<br />

are asking whether this removal of TV<br />

spectrum is even necessary. See the URLs in the<br />

sidebar...<br />

❖ New Kinda-DX<br />

publication<br />

Over the years, I’ve learned that many DXers<br />

didn’t just decide one day they were going<br />

to listen for distant radio stations. Many of us<br />

wanted to hear programming that just wasn’t<br />

available from our local stations. In my case, I<br />

was searching FM for<br />

the rapidly-disappearing<br />

(in the 1970s) progressive<br />

rock stations. For<br />

many a DXer, it was the<br />

search for sports that led<br />

to a new hobby.<br />

MT’s own Ken Reitz<br />

has a new e-book out<br />

that will make sports<br />

DXing easier. The 2012<br />

Baseball Listener’s<br />

Guide lists the stations<br />

across North America<br />

which broadcast professional<br />

baseball. The 30<br />

major-league teams are<br />

covered – and so are<br />

the 100+ minor-league<br />

Ken Reitz’s new e-<br />

book: both a way<br />

to enjoy baseball,<br />

and a way to identify<br />

more DX. (Ken<br />

Reitz)<br />

teams. Obviously, baseball fans wishing to keep<br />

track of their favorite team’s competition will be<br />

interested in this publication.<br />

Really, even if you aren’t a baseball fan, you<br />

should take a look. You’re hearing the Minnesota<br />

Twins on AM 1060, but the only 1060 station in<br />

the state says they don’t carry the games? The<br />

Guide will show which station in a rare state is<br />

carrying this game.<br />

54 MONITORING TIMES August 2012

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!