11.07.2014 Views

2009/2010 Stage 2 Problem Statement - SME

2009/2010 Stage 2 Problem Statement - SME

2009/2010 Stage 2 Problem Statement - SME

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>2009</strong>-<strong>2010</strong> <strong>SME</strong>/NSSGA Student Design Competition<br />

2.3. Geologic Structure<br />

Through hand measurements and remote sensing methods, your geotechnical consultant<br />

collected structural orientation data in the quarry. There are a total of four prevalent joint sets in<br />

the rock mass which have the orientations as presented in Table 1.<br />

Table 1: Dip and dip direction of joint sets at Bev Quarry<br />

Joint Set Dip (degrees) Dip Direction (degrees)<br />

J1 60 359<br />

J2 78 212<br />

J3 14 132<br />

J4 78 306<br />

The average dip and dip directions reported in Table 1 are based on 453 structural measurements<br />

and the stereonet used to establish the joint sets is shown in Figure 1. It is evident that the<br />

average dip and dip directions (and also the number of joint sets) is based on the judgment of the<br />

Engineering Geologist who completed the field mapping and interpreted the stereonets.<br />

Figure 1: Stereonet from Bev Quarry Rock Mass<br />

The intersections of Joint Sets J2, J3, and J4 create orthogonal blocks. Joint Set J3 is associated<br />

with faulting in the region and therefore, in many cases, this joint set is sheared, filled with clay<br />

gouge, and slightly altered. Joint Sets J1, J2 and J4 are generally ‘clean’ and smooth or slightly<br />

rough and moderately weathered.<br />

4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!