2009/2010 Stage 2 Problem Statement - SME
2009/2010 Stage 2 Problem Statement - SME
2009/2010 Stage 2 Problem Statement - SME
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>2009</strong>-<strong>2010</strong> <strong>SME</strong>/NSSGA Student Design Competition<br />
2.5. Assignment<br />
As the mining engineer, your responsibility is to specify the inclination of the quarry pit walls<br />
based on the information given above. For your convenience, the Engineering Geologist who<br />
collected the discontinuity data has subdivided the quarry into engineering ‘sectors’, as seen<br />
below in Figure 2.<br />
According the permit, as presented in Phase One, safety benches are required to be a minimum<br />
of twenty five feet with a maximum bench height of one hundred feet. The maximum bench face<br />
slope is 0.2H:1V. The pit floor can be no lower than 250 feet m.s.l.<br />
Complete an analysis of your mine design and determine the most appropriate final highwall<br />
design for the data given, for the sectors stated below. The bench angles should be based on<br />
kinematic analyses while the overall pit slope angle is a function of the strength of the rock mass.<br />
Inter ramp angles should be based on the results of the overall pit slope angle as appropriate. In<br />
order to conserve time and so that you can focus on other aspects of the design, your engineering<br />
manager has completed the kinematic analysis for sectors 1, 3, 5 and 6. The maximum safe<br />
bench angles are 68, 75, 66, and 90 degrees; respectively. This does not take into account the<br />
overall slope angle, which needs to be determined by your team. An appropriate safety factor for<br />
static conditions is 1.3 given the reliability of the geotechnical data available (and the perceived<br />
risk associated with that safety factor). Seismic loading need not be addressed.<br />
6