20.07.2014 Views

Experimental - Spectroscopy

Experimental - Spectroscopy

Experimental - Spectroscopy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

22 <strong>Spectroscopy</strong> 26(6) June 2011 www.spectroscopyonline.com<br />

Chemometrics in <strong>Spectroscopy</strong><br />

Classical Least Squares, Part VI:<br />

Spectral Results<br />

We continue to examine in detail the spectral behavior of three-component mixtures.<br />

Howard Mark and Jerome Workman, Jr.<br />

This column is the continuation of our discussion of<br />

the classical least squares approach to calibration<br />

(1–5). In this installment, as in the previous one (5),<br />

we will be dealing largely with figures, and the spectra<br />

therein. So far, we have looked at the spectra of the pure<br />

components comprising the ternary mixtures we are<br />

working with. We also have looked at the spectra of all<br />

the mixtures overlaid on each other.<br />

One important reason to perform this extensive exercise<br />

of examining spectra is to address, and hopefully<br />

clear up, a misconception some people have about nearinfrared<br />

(NIR) spectra. Because of its history, NIR spectroscopy<br />

sometimes is believed to rely on, and require,<br />

the “magic” of chemometric analysis to obtain meaningful<br />

scientific results. But that’s not always true. That perception<br />

has arisen because NIR measurements most often<br />

are made on samples that are powdered solids, part of a<br />

dynamic mechanism, or involve other difficult conditions<br />

that often make other types of spectral measurements<br />

impossible.<br />

This has created an impression that NIR exists in a<br />

Celebrating 25 Years<br />

The editors congratulate Howard Mark and<br />

Jerry Workman for 25 years of statistics and<br />

chemometrics columns in <strong>Spectroscopy</strong>.<br />

universe of its own, disconnected from the rest of science.<br />

Therefore, we take this opportunity to emphasize<br />

(and maybe overemphasize) the fact that NIR is not some<br />

“magical” technique that is different from the rest of the<br />

universe, but in fact is the same spectroscopy we are all<br />

used to seeing in other spectral regions. When samples<br />

are presented to a spectrometer, they behave the same<br />

way in the NIR as they do in the UV, visible, mid-IR, or<br />

any other region.<br />

In the current experiment, we have a situation where<br />

clear liquid samples are used, and measured in a cuvette<br />

having plane parallel windows — the near-ideal conditions<br />

that are normally used for any spectral region. In<br />

this way, we can demonstrate that NIR spectra, under<br />

those conditions, do indeed behave the same way as spectra<br />

in other spectral regions do.<br />

Let us look at the three sets of two-component mixtures<br />

that the experimental design includes. These are<br />

presented in Figures 1–3. In these figures, we first present<br />

the full spectrum, and then for each mixture we present<br />

the spectra of the mixtures in the several subranges that<br />

contain the useful absorbance bands.<br />

Examining these spectra, we see some features that<br />

were partially obscured when the spectra from all the<br />

mixtures were plotted together. One effect that was<br />

hidden by the overlapping spectra was the presence of<br />

isosbestic points. Although Figure 5e from part V of this<br />

column series (5) shows a ternary isosbestic point, that<br />

is rare; for the most part isosbestic points are not seen

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!