Download PDF - SRI International
Download PDF - SRI International
Download PDF - SRI International
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Conceptual Frameworks<br />
Cavanaugh, C. 2009. Getting students more learning time online: Distance education in<br />
support of expanded time in K–12 schools. Washington, DC: Center for American<br />
Progress.<br />
• Purpose: “This report outlines the rationale for and steps toward making<br />
distance education courses uniformly available to expand school learning time. It<br />
also outlines some of the urgent needs in American education today and explains<br />
how school districts and educators can use K-12 distance education to address<br />
them” (p. 3).<br />
• Methods: A review of existing literature, including a survey conducted by the<br />
author.<br />
• Findings: “A survey of the directors of 20 virtual schools in 14 states found that<br />
the average annual cost for a full-time online student was $4,310 in 2008, while<br />
the U.S. average per-pupil expenditure in public schools was $9,138, as of 2006”<br />
(p. 12). “Thirty percent of school leaders in a 2008 national survey stated that<br />
online and blended courses are financially beneficial in their schools” (p. 13).<br />
Christensen, C., C. Johnson, and M. Horn. 2008. Disrupting class: How disruptive<br />
innovation will change the way the world learns. New York: McGraw-Hill.<br />
• Purpose: The purpose of the book is “to introduce the innovation disruptively—<br />
not by using it to compete against the existing paradigm and serve existing<br />
customers, but to target those who are not being served” (p. 1).<br />
• Methods: This widely cited book represents an important contribution to the<br />
conceptual framework about productivity and educational technology (including<br />
online learning). Its data sources include some anecdotal evidence from<br />
individual schools, the authors’ expert opinion and existing literature from the<br />
field.<br />
• Findings: “Disrupting what actually happens in the classroom by instituting<br />
student-centric technologies is vital to customize learning for each individual<br />
student and to improve motivation for all” (p. 214).<br />
A-5