23.07.2014 Views

Download PDF - SRI International

Download PDF - SRI International

Download PDF - SRI International

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Conceptual Frameworks<br />

Cavanaugh, C. 2009. Getting students more learning time online: Distance education in<br />

support of expanded time in K–12 schools. Washington, DC: Center for American<br />

Progress.<br />

• Purpose: “This report outlines the rationale for and steps toward making<br />

distance education courses uniformly available to expand school learning time. It<br />

also outlines some of the urgent needs in American education today and explains<br />

how school districts and educators can use K-12 distance education to address<br />

them” (p. 3).<br />

• Methods: A review of existing literature, including a survey conducted by the<br />

author.<br />

• Findings: “A survey of the directors of 20 virtual schools in 14 states found that<br />

the average annual cost for a full-time online student was $4,310 in 2008, while<br />

the U.S. average per-pupil expenditure in public schools was $9,138, as of 2006”<br />

(p. 12). “Thirty percent of school leaders in a 2008 national survey stated that<br />

online and blended courses are financially beneficial in their schools” (p. 13).<br />

Christensen, C., C. Johnson, and M. Horn. 2008. Disrupting class: How disruptive<br />

innovation will change the way the world learns. New York: McGraw-Hill.<br />

• Purpose: The purpose of the book is “to introduce the innovation disruptively—<br />

not by using it to compete against the existing paradigm and serve existing<br />

customers, but to target those who are not being served” (p. 1).<br />

• Methods: This widely cited book represents an important contribution to the<br />

conceptual framework about productivity and educational technology (including<br />

online learning). Its data sources include some anecdotal evidence from<br />

individual schools, the authors’ expert opinion and existing literature from the<br />

field.<br />

• Findings: “Disrupting what actually happens in the classroom by instituting<br />

student-centric technologies is vital to customize learning for each individual<br />

student and to improve motivation for all” (p. 214).<br />

A-5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!