Privy Council Review of intercept as evidence: report - Official ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Government of the Netherlands Northern Ireland Office Baroness Park of Monmouth Police Service of Northern Ireland Baroness Ramsay of Cartvale Judge Roberts Royal Mail Secretary of State for Justice Security Service Serious and Organised Crime Agency Strathclyde Police Nigel Sweeney QC Treasury Solicitor Embassy of the United States of America Stephen Williamson QC Annex B 54
ANNEX C – LIST OF WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS Association of Chief Police Officers Association of Chief Police Officers for Scotland British Telecommunications plc Cabinet Secretary for Justice (Scotland) Crown Prosecution Service Lord Goldsmith Government Communications Headquarters Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs Rt Hon Michael Howard QC MP Intelligence and Security Committee Internet Service Providers Association JUSTICE Sir Paul Kennedy Lord Lloyd of Berwick Lord Advocate Metropolitan Police Ministry of Defence Northern Ireland Public Prosecution Service Office of Criminal Justice Reform Police Ombudsman for Northern Ireland Police Service of Northern Ireland Simon Price Royal Mail Secret Intelligence Service Annex C 55
Page 1 and 2:
PRIVY COUNCIL REVIEW OF INTERCEPT A
Page 3 and 4:
Crown Copyright 2008 The text in th
Page 5 and 6: PRIVY COUNCIL REVIEW OF INTERCEPT A
Page 7 and 8: public, as at least key parts of it
Page 9 and 10: written submissions received. It al
Page 11 and 12: are included in a schedule, which c
Page 13 and 14: independent facilities, however the
Page 15 and 16: - often in real time - and those co
Page 17 and 18: CHAPTER III - POTENTIAL USE AND BEN
Page 19 and 20: sensitivity or the risk to other, m
Page 21 and 22: 66. The existence of an official ca
Page 23 and 24: 81. We have been told that the use
Page 25 and 26: intercept as evidence would bring.
Page 27 and 28: CHAPTER V - RESOURCE IMPLICATIONS I
Page 29 and 30: CHAPTER VI - NEW COMMUNICATIONS TEC
Page 31 and 32: telephone is being set up, any part
Page 33 and 34: CHAPTER VII - RELEVANCE OF EXPERIEN
Page 35 and 36: security service 9 ). Intercept app
Page 37 and 38: 149. Spain provides another example
Page 39 and 40: 159. Although over 90% of offences
Page 41 and 42: Procedures Act 1980 (CIPA). This al
Page 43 and 44: 182. However, even with these examp
Page 45 and 46: o any ‘exculpatory material’ -
Page 47 and 48: decide whether disclosure was neede
Page 49 and 50: evidence, and the failure of that a
Page 51 and 52: The intercepting agency shall decid
Page 53 and 54: considered for cases in the civil c
Page 55: ANNEX B - LIST OF WITNESSES Attorne
Page 59 and 60: ANNEX D - BIBLIOGRAPHY Regulation o
Page 61 and 62: CSP Communications Service Provider
Page 63 and 64: Lawful Interception The interceptio
Page 65 and 66: SOCA Serious Organised Crime Agency
Page 67: Published by TSO (The Stationery Of
show all

Privy Council Review of intercept as evidence: report - Official ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?