Privy Council Review of intercept as evidence: report - Official ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

VolP Voice over Internet Protocol. The standard means of carrying voice communications over an Internet Protocol network. The voice is ‘packetised’ (broken up into a large number of separate data messages) to travel across a multiplicity of routes and are only reassembled at the other end. Warranted Interception Under RIPA (see above), unless both parties consent or other, specific sections of the Act apply, interception must be authorised by warrant from the Secretary of State or Scottish Ministers. At present, all interception warrants are intelligence-only warrants. Printed in the UK by The Stationery Office Limited on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office ID5738265 02/08 Printed on Paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum. Annex E 64
Published by TSO (The Stationery Office) and available from: Online www.tsoshop.co.uk Mail, Telephone Fax & E-Mail TSO PO Box 29, Norwich, NR3 1GN Telephone orders/General enquiries 0870 600 5522 Order through the Parliamentary Hotline Lo-Call 0845 7 023474 Fax orders: 0870 600 5533 E-mail: customer.services@tso.co.uk Textphone: 0870 240 3701 TSO Shops 16 Arthur Street, Belfast BT1 4GD 028 9023 8451 Fax 028 9023 5401 71 Lothian Road, Edinburgh EH3 9AZ 0870 606 5566 Fax 0870 606 5588 The Parliamentary Bookshop 12 Bridge Street, Parliament Square, London SW1A 2JX TSO@Blackwell and other Accredited Agents
Page 1 and 2:
PRIVY COUNCIL REVIEW OF INTERCEPT A
Page 3 and 4:
Crown Copyright 2008 The text in th
Page 5 and 6:
PRIVY COUNCIL REVIEW OF INTERCEPT A
Page 7 and 8:
public, as at least key parts of it
Page 9 and 10:
written submissions received. It al
Page 11 and 12:
are included in a schedule, which c
Page 13 and 14:
independent facilities, however the
Page 15 and 16: - often in real time - and those co
Page 17 and 18: CHAPTER III - POTENTIAL USE AND BEN
Page 19 and 20: sensitivity or the risk to other, m
Page 21 and 22: 66. The existence of an official ca
Page 23 and 24: 81. We have been told that the use
Page 25 and 26: intercept as evidence would bring.
Page 27 and 28: CHAPTER V - RESOURCE IMPLICATIONS I
Page 29 and 30: CHAPTER VI - NEW COMMUNICATIONS TEC
Page 31 and 32: telephone is being set up, any part
Page 33 and 34: CHAPTER VII - RELEVANCE OF EXPERIEN
Page 35 and 36: security service 9 ). Intercept app
Page 37 and 38: 149. Spain provides another example
Page 39 and 40: 159. Although over 90% of offences
Page 41 and 42: Procedures Act 1980 (CIPA). This al
Page 43 and 44: 182. However, even with these examp
Page 45 and 46: o any ‘exculpatory material’ -
Page 47 and 48: decide whether disclosure was neede
Page 49 and 50: evidence, and the failure of that a
Page 51 and 52: The intercepting agency shall decid
Page 53 and 54: considered for cases in the civil c
Page 55 and 56: ANNEX B - LIST OF WITNESSES Attorne
Page 57 and 58: ANNEX C - LIST OF WRITTEN SUBMISSIO
Page 59 and 60: ANNEX D - BIBLIOGRAPHY Regulation o
Page 61 and 62: CSP Communications Service Provider
Page 63 and 64: Lawful Interception The interceptio
Page 65: SOCA Serious Organised Crime Agency
show all

Privy Council Review of intercept as evidence: report - Official ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?