31.07.2014 Views

Static-2002 coding rules (2009) - Static-99

Static-2002 coding rules (2009) - Static-99

Static-2002 coding rules (2009) - Static-99

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

information can be used to count these as sentencing occasions, provided that<br />

the self-report information is sufficient to determine that the events in question<br />

meet the definition of a sentencing occasion based on Clear and Convincing<br />

Evidence (see page 7-8 for further explanation of Clear and Convincing<br />

Evidence). <strong>Static</strong>-<strong>2002</strong> should not be scored, however, in the absence of an<br />

official criminal record.<br />

Victim Information<br />

The <strong>Static</strong>-<strong>2002</strong> contains four items requiring information on the victims: “Any<br />

Male Victim,” “Young, Unrelated Victims,” “Any Unrelated Victim,” and “Any<br />

Stranger Victim.” For each of the offender’s sexual offences the evaluator must<br />

know the pre-offence degree of relationship between the victim and the offender.<br />

To score these items evaluators may use any credible information at their<br />

disposal (including self-report) except the polygraph interview or the polygraph<br />

examination.<br />

Polygraph Information<br />

Information derived solely from polygraph interviews or examinations (for<br />

example, information on victims or offence motivation) is not used to score <strong>Static</strong>-<br />

<strong>2002</strong> unless it can be corroborated by outside sources or the offender provides<br />

sufficient information to support a new criminal investigation. This includes all<br />

disclosures made in preparation for a specific polygraph exam. For example, if<br />

the offender completes a sexual history questionnaire that he knows he will be<br />

specifically polygraphed about, or if he is being interrogated under an explicit<br />

threat of being polygraphed, this information would be excluded. Note that this<br />

applies to specific information and an impending polygraph examination.<br />

Information from disclosures made in a treatment group would not be excluded,<br />

even where there may be a polygraph on something at some later point in time.<br />

Information from polygraph interviews is excluded even if the offender talks<br />

generally about the same “polygraph-based” information during later<br />

conversations such as during treatment groups. For instance, if a “male victim” is<br />

discovered solely during a polygraph interview, and there is no independent<br />

source of that information to be found, then this potential “male victim” does not<br />

count on <strong>Static</strong>-<strong>2002</strong>.<br />

The reason that polygraph information is excluded is that such information was<br />

not used in the development and validation of <strong>Static</strong>-<strong>2002</strong>. Polygraph assisted<br />

disclosures typically provide greater diversity of victim types than gleaned from<br />

other sources; consequently, routinely including information from polygraph<br />

would inflate the scores compared to the procedures used to score <strong>Static</strong>-<strong>2002</strong> in<br />

the development and validation samples.<br />

6

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!