01.08.2014 Views

LIBER 39TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE - Statsbiblioteket

LIBER 39TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE - Statsbiblioteket

LIBER 39TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE - Statsbiblioteket

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

PaRaLLEL sEssIons 1.4 to 4.4<br />

30 JunE 2010<br />

sEssIon 2.4<br />

gIusEPPIna vuLLo (unIvERsIty<br />

of gLasgoW, uk):<br />

a gLoBaL aPPRoach to dIgItaL<br />

LIBRaRy EvaLuatIon<br />

This paper will describe the key research<br />

advances on digital library evaluation<br />

models.<br />

Digital library evaluation has a vital<br />

role to play in building DLs, and in understanding<br />

and enhancing their role in<br />

society. The paper will cover the theoretical<br />

approach, providing an integrated<br />

evaluation model which overcomes the<br />

fragmentation of quality assessments, and<br />

propose some examples of DL evaluation<br />

methodologies, undertaking a comparative<br />

analysis of them.<br />

Digital library evaluation is a growing<br />

interdisciplinary area. Researchers and<br />

practitioners have specific viewpoints<br />

of what DLs are, and they use different<br />

approaches to evaluate them. Each<br />

evaluation approach corresponds to<br />

a DL model, and there is no common<br />

agreement on its definition. Despite that,<br />

more and more efforts have been made<br />

to evaluate DLs. However, a methodology<br />

that encompasses all the approaches does<br />

not yet exist. There are two main reasons<br />

for this:<br />

1. digital libraries are complex entities<br />

which need interdisciplinary approaches<br />

2. digital libraries are synchronic entities:<br />

the speed of evolution of DLs coupled<br />

with their lack of historical traces makes a<br />

longitudinal analysis difficult if not impossible.<br />

Nevertheless, DLs and DL research have<br />

reached a level of maturity such that a<br />

global approach to their evaluation is<br />

needed. It would encourage exchange of<br />

qualitative data and evaluation studies,<br />

allowing comparisons and communication<br />

between research and professional communities.<br />

This paper will provide the research<br />

advances in the field and a theoretical<br />

framework for digital evaluation models.<br />

giuseppina vullo is DL.org Co-Principal<br />

Investigator in the EU-funded Digital<br />

Library Interoperability, Best Practices &<br />

Modelling Foundations (DL.org), where<br />

she coordinates the Working Group<br />

on Quality for Digital Libraries, and<br />

researcher at HATII AT THE University of<br />

Glasgow. She has been a DPEX fellow<br />

at HATII in 2008, where she worked on<br />

digital collections assessment, applying<br />

DRAMBORA and InterPARES 3. Her<br />

research interests range from quality to<br />

contextualization in digital libraries and<br />

enhancement of special collections within<br />

digital environments. Giuseppina completed<br />

in 2009 her Ph.D in Library Science at<br />

the University of Udine, Italy, focusing on<br />

digital libraries evaluation. Before joining<br />

HATII, Giuseppina has been working as<br />

librarian for international organisations in<br />

Italy and in Switzerland.<br />

48

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!