08.09.2014 Views

Traffic legislation and safety in Europe concerning the moped - Swov

Traffic legislation and safety in Europe concerning the moped - Swov

Traffic legislation and safety in Europe concerning the moped - Swov

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Among <strong>the</strong> 16-18 year olds, <strong>the</strong> (light-)<strong>moped</strong> is not <strong>the</strong> mode of transport<br />

which <strong>the</strong>y use most. Both bicycle <strong>and</strong> public transport appear to be used<br />

more.<br />

Mode of transport<br />

Used most by:<br />

Bicycle 49%<br />

Car 9%<br />

Public Transport 20%<br />

Walk<strong>in</strong>g 9%<br />

(Light-)<strong>moped</strong> 13%<br />

Motorcycle 1%<br />

Total (n = 194) 100%<br />

Table 2.4. The most-frequently used modes of transport by <strong>the</strong> young <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

age groups of 16 – 18 years old <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Ne<strong>the</strong>rl<strong>and</strong>s (source: NIPO, 2002).<br />

Table 2.4 shows that <strong>the</strong> (light-)<strong>moped</strong> is most used by only 13% of <strong>the</strong><br />

young <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> age groups of 16 – 18 years old. Most-used is <strong>the</strong> bicycle with<br />

49%, followed by public transport with 20%.<br />

The data <strong>in</strong> Table 2.4 is from a NIPO/Team Alert survey which was held <strong>in</strong><br />

February <strong>and</strong> March 2002 among 16-25 year olds (Team Alert, 2002). The<br />

sample had a size of 624, of which 194 were 16-18 year olds.<br />

2.3. Moped casualties <strong>and</strong> extent of vehicle fleet <strong>in</strong> <strong>Europe</strong>an countries<br />

Different sources have been used: databases of <strong>the</strong> United Nations,<br />

ECMT/CEMT, <strong>and</strong> CARE (see <strong>the</strong> description of CARE <strong>in</strong> Section 2.3.1). In<br />

some cases <strong>the</strong> national statistics of some <strong>Europe</strong>an countries were also<br />

used for supplementation <strong>and</strong> verification.<br />

Us<strong>in</strong>g figures from different databases has <strong>the</strong> advantage that <strong>the</strong>re is a way<br />

to check <strong>the</strong> figures. If <strong>the</strong> match is ra<strong>the</strong>r satisfactory, one can assume <strong>the</strong><br />

figures are correct. In case of a mismatch, <strong>the</strong> best way to check is to ask<br />

<strong>the</strong> orig<strong>in</strong>al figures from <strong>the</strong> countries <strong>in</strong> question.<br />

Only Denmark (<strong>and</strong> to a lesser degree Spa<strong>in</strong>) gave a mismatch between <strong>the</strong><br />

number of killed <strong>moped</strong>ists <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> total number of road users killed. A<br />

check with <strong>the</strong> national Danish data made clear that <strong>the</strong> CARE data only<br />

conta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>the</strong> EU-<strong>moped</strong> class <strong>and</strong> not <strong>the</strong> 'orig<strong>in</strong>al' Danish 30 km/h-<strong>moped</strong>.<br />

From Germany <strong>the</strong> CARE data was miss<strong>in</strong>g, so that a match with <strong>the</strong> ECMTdata<br />

was not possible. Also <strong>in</strong> this case <strong>the</strong> national database was used. For<br />

Germany it was remarkable that <strong>the</strong> number of killed <strong>moped</strong>ists is 'only' 148<br />

consider<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> high total number of road users killed (data from ECMT,<br />

2001). A verification with <strong>the</strong> German data confirmed this low number.<br />

From <strong>the</strong> databases, only <strong>the</strong> road users killed are taken <strong>in</strong>to account (Table<br />

2.5). The reason for this is that <strong>the</strong> registration rate is highest for deaths. For<br />

an <strong>in</strong>ternational comparison of crashs figures, an equally high registration of<br />

casualties is preferable.<br />

12 SWOV publication R-2004-10

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!