10.09.2014 Views

Dimensional Measurement using Vision Systems - NPL Publications ...

Dimensional Measurement using Vision Systems - NPL Publications ...

Dimensional Measurement using Vision Systems - NPL Publications ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Measurement</strong> Good Practice Guide No. 39<br />

• The standard deviation each of the measurements must be taken into account. Since<br />

each spot is measured 3 times we divide it by the square root of 3, giving the<br />

standard uncertainty of the mean (or standard deviation of the mean). Where N<br />

measurements are made, the standard deviation is divided by √N.<br />

So the combined standard uncertainty for each of the measurements, by summing in<br />

quadrature, is ±√ 0.079+ (SD/√3) 2 , where SD is the standard deviation of the<br />

measurements. This gives us a standard uncertainty of ±0.28 µm for the measurements<br />

and the expanded uncertainty is ±0.56 µm, for a 95% confidence level.<br />

By comparing results, it can be seen that the measurement uncertainty when <strong>using</strong> the<br />

system as a comparator is seven times smaller than when <strong>using</strong> it in a direct measurement<br />

mode. For highest accuracy measurements vision systems should therefore be used as<br />

comparators whenever possible. However, it is also worth noting that the accuracy of the<br />

results from the direct measurement mode example is well within the measurement<br />

uncertainty. It is, of course, up to the end user to decide what level of accuracy and<br />

uncertainty is acceptable for his particular measurements. Further information regarding<br />

the calculation of uncertainty may be found in the <strong>NPL</strong> <strong>Measurement</strong> Best Practice Guide<br />

No. 11, ‘A Beginner’s Guide to Uncertainty of <strong>Measurement</strong>.’<br />

8 WORDS OF WARNING<br />

Making accurate measurements is as much about being confident of the measuring<br />

system’s 1 performance history as it is about its day-to-day repeatability. Whilst modern<br />

vision systems generally exhibit excellent measurement repeatability and reproducibility,<br />

measurement errors can still be produced. This can be due for example to the use of<br />

incorrect or inappropriate measurement practices, technical problems with the equipment,<br />

calibration errors, changes in environmental conditions or operator errors. In order to<br />

minimize such problems and ensure that accurate measurements are made, users are<br />

recommended to take steps to regularly monitor the performance of their measuring<br />

systems by acquiring and analysing statistics on repeatability and reproducibility. This will<br />

enable departures from ‘the normal’ to be spotted at an early stage and allow action to be<br />

taken to identify and correct the source of the errors in order to return the measuring system<br />

to its desired operating state.<br />

1 The measuring system here includes the vision system, any associated equipment or<br />

accessories required for the measurement and the operator.<br />

57

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!