11.09.2014 Views

PDF Download - Glidewell Dental Labs

PDF Download - Glidewell Dental Labs

PDF Download - Glidewell Dental Labs

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Implant Placement<br />

The surgical index proved reliable in<br />

accurately positioning the guide for<br />

surgery (Fig. 16). After administering<br />

mandibular anesthesia, the surgical<br />

guide was placed with the aid of the<br />

index, and fixation pins were installed<br />

to hold the guide firmly in place to<br />

begin the surgery.<br />

After using a gingival tissue punch,<br />

the guide was removed to facilitate<br />

removal of tissue at the implant sites.<br />

The index was again used to position<br />

the guide following tissue removal,<br />

and the fixation pins realigned to their<br />

holes without incident. The surgical<br />

guide was used to prepare the osteotomies<br />

and guide the placement of four<br />

4.7 mm implants. Primary stability of<br />

all four implants was acceptable, and<br />

multi-unit abutments were mounted<br />

on top of the implants (Fig. 17).<br />

The temporary prosthesis was held<br />

in place with a luting index, and cold<br />

cure acrylic was used to fix the prosthesis<br />

to the multi-unit temporary<br />

cylinders (Fig. 18). After curing, the<br />

prosthesis was removed and finished<br />

extraorally before being reattached to<br />

the multi-unit abutments (Fig. 19).<br />

Minimal occlusal adjustments were<br />

made immediately after delivery of<br />

the provisional prosthesis. Because<br />

the patient was still under anesthesia,<br />

obtaining an accurate, repeatable<br />

centric occlusion proved challenging.<br />

The patient’s bite was adjusted during<br />

a routine postoperative check a<br />

few days later, and by the third visit,<br />

her bite was comfortable and stable<br />

(Figs. 20a–20c).<br />

The provisional was designed to<br />

remain out of contact with the periimplant<br />

tissue to allow for cleansing. It<br />

also did not cantilever past the distalmost<br />

implant. This abbreviated design<br />

reduced the forces transmitted to the<br />

implants, even though the patient’s<br />

provisional prosthesis was opposed<br />

Figure 16: Before installing the fixation pins, the<br />

surgical index was used to help ensure accurate<br />

positioning of the surgical guide.<br />

Figure 18: A luting index was installed below the provisional<br />

denture, and the prosthesis was processed<br />

to the temporary cylinders with cold cure acrylic.<br />

20a<br />

20c<br />

Figure 17: After verifying primary stability of the<br />

implants, the multi-unit abutments were torqued into<br />

place.<br />

Figure 19: After being finished extraorally, the denture<br />

was reattached to the multi-unit abutments,<br />

serving the patient well as a fixed overdenture until<br />

delivery of the final restoration.<br />

20b<br />

Figures 20a–20c: Retracted lateral and anterior<br />

views of the patient’s mouth with adjusted provisional<br />

denture in place exhibit the proper occlusion and<br />

centric relation that were achieved by the third visit.<br />

– Reducing Treatment Time with Digital Dentistry – 41

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!