13.09.2014 Views

P - CLSA

P - CLSA

P - CLSA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Developing Efficient Survey Techniques<br />

James K. Crossfield, Ph.D<br />

Associatie Professor, Department<br />

of Civil and Surveyng Engineering,<br />

California State University, Fresno,<br />

Fresno, CA 93740<br />

(Continued from Spring Issue)<br />

The Real Property Connection<br />

Perhaps the most significant driving<br />

force behind the burgeoning<br />

number of computerized land information<br />

systems is the lure of<br />

avoiding duplication and waste by<br />

having one department or agency,<br />

rather than several, create and<br />

maintain the maps and related land<br />

records information. Efforts to keep<br />

costs down in such new systems<br />

often lead to development of quickfix,<br />

spatially imprecise systems that<br />

satisfy only some of the system requirements.<br />

More precise spatial requirements<br />

for future large scale<br />

mapping, land ownership records,<br />

or engineering design requirements<br />

are often not attainable in this<br />

scenario. Thus, a system that cannot<br />

avoid redesign may not have<br />

avoided duplication.<br />

The term "spatial imprecision,"<br />

as used here, is a measure of the<br />

distance between the location of a<br />

point as recorded in the computer<br />

and the location of that point on the<br />

ground. Unfortunately, most computerized<br />

land records information<br />

systems disregard spatial precision<br />

in their mapping applications by using<br />

one or more of the following<br />

techniques:<br />

1. "Rubber sheeting" to stretch<br />

and/or distort map data;<br />

2. Arbitrary elimination of apparent<br />

overlaps and gaps that<br />

are fully documented as existent<br />

in written legal records;<br />

3. Digitizing maps of unknown<br />

reliability to create computer<br />

map data having an even<br />

greater lack of spatial precision.<br />

Typical land records information<br />

systems create digitized boundary<br />

files from USGS IV2 minute<br />

topographic map sheets and existing<br />

assessors' maps. The positional<br />

uncertainty of any USGS<br />

map point is typically about 40',<br />

while the typical assessor's map<br />

contains about 10' of spatial im-<br />

FAST FINDING<br />

Locates steel objects:<br />

well casings, cast iron<br />

water lines, valve boxes,<br />

masonry nails, manhole<br />

covers, surveyor's markers<br />

and gas lines.<br />

• New state-of-the-art meter<br />

• Audio and visual readouts<br />

• Continuous one-tube<br />

construction<br />

• Ultra-light 2V& lb.<br />

• Built-in battery charger<br />

• Uses regular C-cell batteries<br />

• Battery condition meter<br />

• Fast battery changing<br />

• Rugged construction<br />

• Solid state electronics<br />

For CST5 new, complete<br />

56-page catalog.<br />

.:i<br />

ObA<br />

FT-60<br />

Mfr. List $525<br />

Audiovisual<br />

Locator<br />

iiiiHTri<br />

Chicago Steel Tape<br />

Dept-CSR, 450 Cips St.. P.O. Box 359<br />

Watseka, IL 60970 • (815)432-5237<br />

Exclusive Canadian Distributor<br />

Norman Wade Co., Ltd.. 75 Milner<br />

Scarborough, Ontario. CANADA MIS 3R7<br />

{416) 291-4211<br />

precision at every map point. Public<br />

decisions about private propertj^^<br />

rights should not be made when th^^^<br />

spatial uncertainty of the system<br />

may be larger than some owners'<br />

properties. A sample survey conducted<br />

in Spring 1985 by surveying<br />

students at California State University,<br />

Fresno, found that property<br />

owners were tolerant of no more<br />

than a one-half foot error in the location<br />

of their boundary lines.<br />

The following list summarizes<br />

several important facts associated<br />

with the increasingly popular computerization<br />

of land records information<br />

systems:<br />

1. Modern computerized land<br />

records information systems<br />

are necessary so that society<br />

can correctly and quickly<br />

answer fundamental questions<br />

about public and private<br />

rights and responsibilities to<br />

land.<br />

2. The common thread linking all<br />

types of environmental,<br />

resource, and ownership<br />

aspects of land is the<br />

geographical location of thesj^^<br />

items on the ground. Thos^^<br />

who deal with ground coordinates<br />

on a daily basis are the<br />

individuals who must provide<br />

guidance for the development<br />

of spatially reliable computerized<br />

land records information<br />

systems.<br />

3. Modernized land records information<br />

systems must be<br />

designed from the ground up<br />

with positional data of known<br />

quality used to create each<br />

new overlay of information.<br />

4. The spatial reliabihty of all<br />

data sets must be known at all<br />

times so that land ownership<br />

rights and responsibilities are<br />

not incorrectly determined<br />

because of imprecise information.<br />

Fundamentally, then, the<br />

cadastral overlay portion of<br />

multipurpose land information<br />

systems must be designed to include<br />

the spatial and written components<br />

of the entire collection of<br />

deed, abstract, and land survei^<br />

records relative to each parcel c^B<br />

land. To do less would run counter<br />

to long-estabUshed common law<br />

(Continued on page 8)<br />

Page 6 The California Surveyor — Summer, 1986

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!