29.09.2014 Views

Download - Autosim Autosim

Download - Autosim Autosim

Download - Autosim Autosim

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CURRENT & FUTURE TECHNOLOGIES IN AUTOMOTIVE ENGINEERING SIMULATION<br />

provide a means of grading the skills of numerical analysts but it would<br />

appear that the scheme is largely unheard of around Europe and is not<br />

recognised within industry. Future promotion of this scheme may help to<br />

establish it as a staff training best practice.<br />

Often analysts encounter barriers in attending courses because of the time<br />

and resources that this involves. This problem is partly attributed to the fact<br />

that the value of training and attendance on courses is not fully appreciated<br />

by managers and decision makers within organisations. It is important that<br />

personnel within organisations that have authority to sign off the resources<br />

for training and course attendance have a better appreciation of the return<br />

in value that this will provide. Also in the future greater use should be made<br />

of the internet/web to deliver courses and training which would help to<br />

alleviate the resources and time typically involved in attending courses and<br />

training programmes. This is a concept which appears to be gaining<br />

momentum with organisations such as NAFEMS regularly holding webinars<br />

in order to communicate knowledge and training to a larger global audience.<br />

The concept of ‘up-front’ simulation has been discussed at length in the Key<br />

Technology area of Integration in the AUTOSIM project. One interpretation<br />

of this concept is that FEM tools embedded in CAD systems are used to<br />

analyse and optimise designs at earlier stages of the design process. In<br />

view of the extensive training that numerical analysts receive in order to<br />

develop competent skills it appears impractical, because of other work<br />

commitments, that designers could be trained to a competent level to carry<br />

out numerical analysis studies. It is envisaged that a more practical<br />

approach to resolving this particular aspect of upfront simulation is more of<br />

an organisational than a training issue. The proposed approach is that<br />

designers should have a basic understanding of numerical methods, but<br />

competent trained analysts should be used to support them in carrying out<br />

numerical studies. Even today’s software tools are equipped with features<br />

such as process automation, rules for meshing and material databases that<br />

could be used to support designers in carrying out correct CAE analysis<br />

studies.<br />

4.4.6 Material Data (Data validity)<br />

4.4.6.1 Material Data – Current/Best Practices<br />

The accuracy and detail of available material data has an important<br />

influence on the accuracy of the predictions that are obtained from a<br />

numerical model. In terms of the practical application of material data it is<br />

understood that it is often necessary to estimate coefficients for material<br />

models because of the limited availability of good quality material data. The<br />

decisions for these estimates are typically based on engineering experience<br />

and knowledge. However, this practice will still affect the accuracy of the<br />

42 |<br />

SIXTH FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME PRIORITY [6.2] [SUSTAINABLE SURFACE TRANSPORT]<br />

012497 AUTOSIM

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!