29.09.2014 Views

Auckland City Centre Rail Link - Business Case Review - Ministry of ...

Auckland City Centre Rail Link - Business Case Review - Ministry of ...

Auckland City Centre Rail Link - Business Case Review - Ministry of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Auckland</strong> <strong>City</strong> <strong>Centre</strong> <strong>Rail</strong> <strong>Link</strong> <strong>Business</strong> <strong>Case</strong> <strong>Review</strong> | May 2011<br />

first affected firm equals the average effect across all firms, and there will be no<br />

consequent impacts from re-location on market conditions).<br />

<strong>Auckland</strong> Council <strong>of</strong>ficers consider it is unlikely that either would hold. Rather,<br />

<strong>of</strong>ficers would expect individual and cumulative location changes to affect the<br />

marketplace. In turn, these changes would be likely to generate other benefits to<br />

firms from re-location to the CBD, which are over and above the net changes in<br />

transport costs 27 . Therefore, a larger share (than just the tax wedge) should be<br />

included as a benefit.<br />

1.8.4 <strong>Auckland</strong> Council/<strong>Auckland</strong> Transport views on overall wider economic<br />

benefits<br />

As discussed in Appendix E, <strong>Auckland</strong> Council and <strong>Auckland</strong> Transport have<br />

presented a policy case that sets out their view on transport benefits. WEBs are<br />

calculated as a percentage <strong>of</strong> these benefits and also vary according to job growth<br />

assumptions. The table below provides the WEBs estimates for the low (5,000 jobs)<br />

and high (20,000 jobs) <strong>Auckland</strong> Council/<strong>Auckland</strong> Transport policy case scenarios.<br />

<strong>Auckland</strong> Council and <strong>Auckland</strong> Transport <strong>of</strong>ficers have also estimated that the<br />

project could generate additional regional economic growth. They estimate this could<br />

result in up to $1,300 million in additional benefits but note that only a component <strong>of</strong><br />

this number is additive to other benefits. The impact on the total WEBs on the policy<br />

case is shown in the table below.<br />

Table 17: <strong>Auckland</strong> Council and <strong>Auckland</strong> Transport estimation <strong>of</strong> wider economic benefits<br />

Benefit category<br />

Low growth scenario High growth scenario<br />

(5,000 jobs) ($M, NPV) (20,000 jobs) ($M, NPV)<br />

Agglomeration benefits 393 455<br />

Imperfect competition 30 34<br />

Labour supply 57 66<br />

Job relocation 148 591<br />

Total WEBs 628 1,146<br />

Increase in the size <strong>of</strong> the<br />

regional economy<br />

0-1,300 0-1,300<br />

Total including regional<br />

growth<br />

628-1,928 1,146-2,446<br />

1.9 Summary<br />

The Working Group has reviewed the analysis and estimation <strong>of</strong> WEBs in the<br />

<strong>Business</strong> <strong>Case</strong> for the CCRL. The <strong>Review</strong> concluded that while some WEBs were<br />

omitted, overall the <strong>Business</strong> <strong>Case</strong> WEBs were significantly overstated.<br />

The <strong>Review</strong> examined the <strong>Business</strong> <strong>Case</strong> estimate <strong>of</strong> 22,000 additional jobs as a<br />

result <strong>of</strong> the CCRL and concluded there were methodological issues with the<br />

<strong>Business</strong> <strong>Case</strong> approach. The <strong>Review</strong> concludes that up to 5,000 jobs could locate<br />

into the CBD, within the total forecast by the ARLTS, as a result <strong>of</strong> the project.<br />

<strong>Auckland</strong> Council and <strong>Auckland</strong> Transport <strong>of</strong>ficers consider:<br />

the job growth will be between 5,000 and 20,000 and that these will be jobs<br />

additional to the ARLTS forecasts<br />

27 <strong>Auckland</strong> Council has provided further detail explaining their argument in their memo <strong>of</strong> April 4<br />

44

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!