Auckland City Centre Rail Link - Business Case Review - Ministry of ...
Auckland City Centre Rail Link - Business Case Review - Ministry of ...
Auckland City Centre Rail Link - Business Case Review - Ministry of ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Auckland</strong> <strong>City</strong> <strong>Centre</strong> <strong>Rail</strong> <strong>Link</strong> <strong>Business</strong> <strong>Case</strong> <strong>Review</strong> | May 2011<br />
first affected firm equals the average effect across all firms, and there will be no<br />
consequent impacts from re-location on market conditions).<br />
<strong>Auckland</strong> Council <strong>of</strong>ficers consider it is unlikely that either would hold. Rather,<br />
<strong>of</strong>ficers would expect individual and cumulative location changes to affect the<br />
marketplace. In turn, these changes would be likely to generate other benefits to<br />
firms from re-location to the CBD, which are over and above the net changes in<br />
transport costs 27 . Therefore, a larger share (than just the tax wedge) should be<br />
included as a benefit.<br />
1.8.4 <strong>Auckland</strong> Council/<strong>Auckland</strong> Transport views on overall wider economic<br />
benefits<br />
As discussed in Appendix E, <strong>Auckland</strong> Council and <strong>Auckland</strong> Transport have<br />
presented a policy case that sets out their view on transport benefits. WEBs are<br />
calculated as a percentage <strong>of</strong> these benefits and also vary according to job growth<br />
assumptions. The table below provides the WEBs estimates for the low (5,000 jobs)<br />
and high (20,000 jobs) <strong>Auckland</strong> Council/<strong>Auckland</strong> Transport policy case scenarios.<br />
<strong>Auckland</strong> Council and <strong>Auckland</strong> Transport <strong>of</strong>ficers have also estimated that the<br />
project could generate additional regional economic growth. They estimate this could<br />
result in up to $1,300 million in additional benefits but note that only a component <strong>of</strong><br />
this number is additive to other benefits. The impact on the total WEBs on the policy<br />
case is shown in the table below.<br />
Table 17: <strong>Auckland</strong> Council and <strong>Auckland</strong> Transport estimation <strong>of</strong> wider economic benefits<br />
Benefit category<br />
Low growth scenario High growth scenario<br />
(5,000 jobs) ($M, NPV) (20,000 jobs) ($M, NPV)<br />
Agglomeration benefits 393 455<br />
Imperfect competition 30 34<br />
Labour supply 57 66<br />
Job relocation 148 591<br />
Total WEBs 628 1,146<br />
Increase in the size <strong>of</strong> the<br />
regional economy<br />
0-1,300 0-1,300<br />
Total including regional<br />
growth<br />
628-1,928 1,146-2,446<br />
1.9 Summary<br />
The Working Group has reviewed the analysis and estimation <strong>of</strong> WEBs in the<br />
<strong>Business</strong> <strong>Case</strong> for the CCRL. The <strong>Review</strong> concluded that while some WEBs were<br />
omitted, overall the <strong>Business</strong> <strong>Case</strong> WEBs were significantly overstated.<br />
The <strong>Review</strong> examined the <strong>Business</strong> <strong>Case</strong> estimate <strong>of</strong> 22,000 additional jobs as a<br />
result <strong>of</strong> the CCRL and concluded there were methodological issues with the<br />
<strong>Business</strong> <strong>Case</strong> approach. The <strong>Review</strong> concludes that up to 5,000 jobs could locate<br />
into the CBD, within the total forecast by the ARLTS, as a result <strong>of</strong> the project.<br />
<strong>Auckland</strong> Council and <strong>Auckland</strong> Transport <strong>of</strong>ficers consider:<br />
the job growth will be between 5,000 and 20,000 and that these will be jobs<br />
additional to the ARLTS forecasts<br />
27 <strong>Auckland</strong> Council has provided further detail explaining their argument in their memo <strong>of</strong> April 4<br />
44