13.10.2014 Views

The Regents - University of California | Office of The President

The Regents - University of California | Office of The President

The Regents - University of California | Office of The President

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

21<br />

22<br />

23<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten obtained the loans first and only later would obtain Board <strong>of</strong> Directors’<br />

approval. <strong>The</strong> loans were not properly disclosed in WorldCom’s financial<br />

statements.<br />

91. Also Scott D. Sullivan, the CFO, received lucrative compensation<br />

packages. Sullivan, a C.P.A., joined WorldCom in late 1992 or early 1993 as a<br />

result <strong>of</strong> WorldCom’s merger with Advanced Telecommunications Corporation<br />

where he had been Vice <strong>President</strong> and Treasurer. His first title at WorldCom was<br />

that <strong>of</strong> Assistant Treasurer. In 1994, he became Chief Financial <strong>Office</strong>r, Treasurer<br />

and Secretary <strong>of</strong> WorldCom, and in 1996, he became a Director <strong>of</strong> the Company.<br />

According to filings with the SEC, in 1998, he received a salary <strong>of</strong> $500,000 and a<br />

bonus <strong>of</strong> $2,000,000; in 1999, in received a salary <strong>of</strong> $600,000 and a bonus <strong>of</strong><br />

$2,760,000. In 2000, he received a salary <strong>of</strong> $700,000 and a retention bonus <strong>of</strong><br />

$10,000,000. According to WorldCom’s proxy statements for its 2002<br />

shareholder meeting, Sullivan beneficially owned 3,264,438 shares <strong>of</strong> stock.<br />

92. Even as the Internet bubble burst in early 2000, WorldCom continued<br />

to show pr<strong>of</strong>its although its stock value did decline. Until the third quarter <strong>of</strong><br />

2000, WorldCom’s reported earnings consistently met or nearly met analyst’s<br />

predictions. In subsequent quarters, WorldCom claimed non-repeating charges<br />

which stopped it from meeting targets. In the first six months <strong>of</strong> 2001,<br />

WorldCom’s stock was generally trading in the $18-$21 range. After that, it<br />

continued to decline, but its decline appeared to be consistent with other declines<br />

in the industry which was suffering problems in the long-distance and Internet<br />

business.<br />

24<br />

25<br />

VII.<br />

THE FRAUDULENT SCHEME<br />

93. While the Defendants were representing to the public that WorldCom<br />

26<br />

27<br />

28<br />

was a pr<strong>of</strong>itable company, in fact, it was an illusion based on fraudulent<br />

accounting practices accomplished with the assistance and knowledge <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Defendants that allowed the fraud to flourish. WorldCom and the Defendants<br />

37<br />

COMPLAINT

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!