The Regents - University of California | Office of The President
The Regents - University of California | Office of The President
The Regents - University of California | Office of The President
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
4<br />
5<br />
6<br />
7<br />
8<br />
9<br />
10<br />
11<br />
12<br />
13<br />
14<br />
15<br />
16<br />
17<br />
18<br />
19<br />
20<br />
21<br />
22<br />
23<br />
24<br />
25<br />
26<br />
27<br />
28<br />
ran the company, the internal control environment at the company, and the<br />
existence <strong>of</strong> any unusually high audit risks at WorldCom. Andersen holds itself<br />
out as an expert in auditing and accounting rules regarding the<br />
telecommunications industry, and thus was familiar with WorldCom’s business<br />
and the proper accounting standards WorldCom had to follow to fairly present its<br />
financial statements in accordance with GAAP.<br />
160. Andersen did investigate WorldCom’s key accounting principles and<br />
practices, transaction processes and judgments, including its treatment <strong>of</strong> Line<br />
Costs. For example, in a Report to the Audit Committee for year ended December<br />
31, 2001 which was dated February 6, 2002 (Exhibit “C”), Melvin Dick, on behalf<br />
<strong>of</strong> Andersen, summarized the audit approach and audit results for the year ended<br />
2001, discussed Andersen’s views regarding WorldCom’s key accounting<br />
principles and practices, transaction processes and judgments and estimates used<br />
in preparation <strong>of</strong> its financial statements, and communicated matters required by<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>essional standards. On page 8 <strong>of</strong> the report, Andersen specifically discusses<br />
Line Costs. Andersen gave its assessment that WorldCom’s processes for Line<br />
Costs, including Line Cost accrual, Line Cost Disputes and Line Cost Allocation<br />
Report was effective. Additionally, Andersen represented that WorldCom had<br />
effective processes for: “allowance for doubtful accounts, accrued line costs, line<br />
cost disputes, legal reserves and contingent liabilities, asset depreciable lives and<br />
impairment <strong>of</strong> long-lived assets.” Id. at 10.<br />
161. <strong>The</strong>refore, Andersen specifically analyzed and knew about<br />
WorldCom’s account for the Line Costs. Andersen described WorldCom’s Line<br />
Cost accruals as “Line costs represent charges from LECs for leased lines or traffic<br />
termination.” It stated, “Line costs as a percentage <strong>of</strong> revenues have remained flat<br />
at 41.9% <strong>of</strong> use and revenues” and “Line costs are allocated between the<br />
WorldCom group and MCI Group based on minutes <strong>of</strong> use and revenues.”<br />
Andersen discussed “Accruals are based on metered traffic as determined by<br />
58<br />
COMPLAINT