13.10.2014 Views

The Regents - University of California | Office of The President

The Regents - University of California | Office of The President

The Regents - University of California | Office of The President

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

21<br />

22<br />

23<br />

24<br />

25<br />

26<br />

27<br />

28<br />

New responsibilities for a new century– an introduction<br />

Id, page 4 (App B-6).<br />

As we start this new century, audit committees face new<br />

responsibilities and requirements. <strong>The</strong>y must meet new<br />

standards for membership, independence, and financial<br />

literacy. <strong>The</strong>y must comply with new requirements to<br />

draft or update their chargers and certify their<br />

compliance with the rules. And most importantly, they<br />

have a new obligation each quarter to discuss with the<br />

independent auditor the quality <strong>of</strong> the company’s<br />

financial reporting. . . . [] <strong>The</strong>se new standards are a<br />

mandate for audit committees (and through them,<br />

auditors) to raise the bar and enhance their effectiveness<br />

as investors’ representatives in financial reporting<br />

oversight. Audit committees can respond to these<br />

changes in many ways to build substantive<br />

improvements into their processes.<br />

<strong>The</strong> White Paper also recognizes that the independent auditors also have<br />

increased responsibilities to communicate with the audit committee:<br />

Discussion <strong>of</strong> the quality <strong>of</strong> financial reporting: the new<br />

requirement ASB requirement In connection with each<br />

SEC audit engagement, independent auditors are<br />

required to discuss with the audit committee the auditors’<br />

judgments about the quality, not just the acceptability, <strong>of</strong><br />

the company’s accounting principles as applies in its<br />

financial reporting (the annual quality discussion).<br />

Id. at 9 (App B-11). See also id. at 13 (App B-15) (amended Statement <strong>of</strong><br />

Auditing Standards (SAS) 61 requires auditor to meet with audit committee to<br />

discuss quality not just the acceptability <strong>of</strong> a company’s accounting principles).<br />

Andersen also recognizes that under new SEC requirements, “independent<br />

auditors are required to review interim financial statements before the company<br />

files its Form 10-Q or 10-QSB.” Id. at 11 (App B-13); see also id. at 49 (App. B-<br />

51) re SAS 71, Interim Financial Information).<br />

158. Andersen, in contracting to perform its audit <strong>of</strong> WorldCom’s financial<br />

statements, assumed all <strong>of</strong> the responsibilities and obligations.<br />

159. As part <strong>of</strong> its planning for and implementation <strong>of</strong> various<br />

engagements for WorldCom, Andersen was required to be thoroughly familiar<br />

with the nature <strong>of</strong> WorldCom’s business, the manner in which senior management<br />

57<br />

COMPLAINT

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!