The Regents - University of California | Office of The President
The Regents - University of California | Office of The President
The Regents - University of California | Office of The President
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
4<br />
5<br />
6<br />
7<br />
8<br />
9<br />
10<br />
11<br />
12<br />
13<br />
14<br />
15<br />
16<br />
17<br />
18<br />
19<br />
20<br />
21<br />
22<br />
23<br />
24<br />
25<br />
26<br />
27<br />
28<br />
New responsibilities for a new century– an introduction<br />
Id, page 4 (App B-6).<br />
As we start this new century, audit committees face new<br />
responsibilities and requirements. <strong>The</strong>y must meet new<br />
standards for membership, independence, and financial<br />
literacy. <strong>The</strong>y must comply with new requirements to<br />
draft or update their chargers and certify their<br />
compliance with the rules. And most importantly, they<br />
have a new obligation each quarter to discuss with the<br />
independent auditor the quality <strong>of</strong> the company’s<br />
financial reporting. . . . [] <strong>The</strong>se new standards are a<br />
mandate for audit committees (and through them,<br />
auditors) to raise the bar and enhance their effectiveness<br />
as investors’ representatives in financial reporting<br />
oversight. Audit committees can respond to these<br />
changes in many ways to build substantive<br />
improvements into their processes.<br />
<strong>The</strong> White Paper also recognizes that the independent auditors also have<br />
increased responsibilities to communicate with the audit committee:<br />
Discussion <strong>of</strong> the quality <strong>of</strong> financial reporting: the new<br />
requirement ASB requirement In connection with each<br />
SEC audit engagement, independent auditors are<br />
required to discuss with the audit committee the auditors’<br />
judgments about the quality, not just the acceptability, <strong>of</strong><br />
the company’s accounting principles as applies in its<br />
financial reporting (the annual quality discussion).<br />
Id. at 9 (App B-11). See also id. at 13 (App B-15) (amended Statement <strong>of</strong><br />
Auditing Standards (SAS) 61 requires auditor to meet with audit committee to<br />
discuss quality not just the acceptability <strong>of</strong> a company’s accounting principles).<br />
Andersen also recognizes that under new SEC requirements, “independent<br />
auditors are required to review interim financial statements before the company<br />
files its Form 10-Q or 10-QSB.” Id. at 11 (App B-13); see also id. at 49 (App. B-<br />
51) re SAS 71, Interim Financial Information).<br />
158. Andersen, in contracting to perform its audit <strong>of</strong> WorldCom’s financial<br />
statements, assumed all <strong>of</strong> the responsibilities and obligations.<br />
159. As part <strong>of</strong> its planning for and implementation <strong>of</strong> various<br />
engagements for WorldCom, Andersen was required to be thoroughly familiar<br />
with the nature <strong>of</strong> WorldCom’s business, the manner in which senior management<br />
57<br />
COMPLAINT