The Regents - University of California | Office of The President
The Regents - University of California | Office of The President
The Regents - University of California | Office of The President
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
4<br />
5<br />
6<br />
7<br />
8<br />
9<br />
10<br />
11<br />
12<br />
13<br />
14<br />
15<br />
16<br />
17<br />
18<br />
19<br />
20<br />
21<br />
22<br />
23<br />
24<br />
25<br />
26<br />
27<br />
28<br />
! <strong>The</strong>re were no records to support decisions to capitalize the Line<br />
Items. <strong>The</strong> amount which was capitalized was exactly the amount<br />
needed by WorldCom to meet its pr<strong>of</strong>it margin goals.<br />
! In testimony to <strong>The</strong> House Financial Services Committee on July 8,<br />
2002, Melvin Dick, a former Andersen manager, admitted that<br />
Andersen had not asked for documentation to backup WorldCom’s<br />
financial statements.<br />
! In March <strong>of</strong> 2002, Andersen knew that the SEC was investigating<br />
WorldCom.<br />
167. As the Chairman <strong>of</strong> the Board <strong>of</strong> WorldCom, Bert C. Roberts, told<br />
the Committee on Financial Services <strong>of</strong> the U.S. House <strong>of</strong> Representatives on July<br />
8, 2002:<br />
<strong>The</strong> accounting irregularities that are the subject <strong>of</strong><br />
today’s hearings are an outrage to me. To my mind, the<br />
failure <strong>of</strong> our outside auditors to uncover them is<br />
inconceivable.<br />
D. Andersen Allowed the Fraud to Continue and Made False<br />
Representations About WorldCom’s Financial Statements<br />
168. Andersen violated its pr<strong>of</strong>essional responsibilities, and knowingly or<br />
recklessly participated with WorldCom a scheme to defraud and in order to<br />
artificially boost WorldCom’s reported revenue and pr<strong>of</strong>its.<br />
169. Although Andersen was aware that practices <strong>of</strong> WorldCom artificially<br />
inflated revenue were in violation <strong>of</strong> GAAP, Andersen provided a “clean” audit<br />
opinion related to the company’s financial statements for year end 1994-2001 in<br />
violation <strong>of</strong> GAAS (Generally Accepted Auditing Standards). For each <strong>of</strong> these<br />
years, Andersen consented to its audit opinion to be filed with WorldCom’s 10-K,<br />
Registration Statements and other public documents knowing that those<br />
documents would be disseminated to the investing public. Plaintiff purchased<br />
WorldCom stock in reliance on these representations.<br />
63<br />
COMPLAINT