The Regents - University of California | Office of The President
The Regents - University of California | Office of The President
The Regents - University of California | Office of The President
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
4<br />
5<br />
6<br />
7<br />
8<br />
9<br />
10<br />
11<br />
12<br />
13<br />
14<br />
15<br />
16<br />
17<br />
18<br />
19<br />
20<br />
21<br />
22<br />
23<br />
24<br />
25<br />
26<br />
27<br />
28<br />
232. Grubman’s staff also had access to confidential insider information.<br />
<strong>The</strong> House Financial Services Committee has released e-mails showing that in the<br />
morning <strong>of</strong> June 24, 2002, a Salomon bond analyst, Robert Waldman, sent an e-<br />
mail to WorldCom asking about rumors <strong>of</strong> a major accounting problem.<br />
Publically, Waldman issued a report telling investors that they should not be<br />
concerned about Grubman’s downgrade <strong>of</strong> the stock three days earlier.<br />
F. Salomon Made Misrepresentations and Omitted<br />
Material Facts to Retain its Lucrative Fees from WorldCom<br />
233. When Salomon issued its WorldCom analyst reports, it had in its<br />
possession material, adverse and non-public information regarding its role in<br />
Salomon’s investment banking business and it knew that this information was<br />
material, adverse, non-public information which reasonable investors deciding to<br />
invest would want to know in making their investment decision.<br />
234. When Salomon issued its WorldCom analyst reports, it knew that<br />
issuing the reports would, as had its prior reports, serve to increase or inflate the<br />
price at which WorldCom stock traded, compared to the price it would have traded<br />
had Salomon not issued the WorldCom analyst report. Salomon issued the<br />
WorldCom analyst reports with the intention <strong>of</strong> increasing and inflating the price<br />
at which WorldCom stock would trade.<br />
235. Salomon issued its false and misleading analyst reports as part <strong>of</strong><br />
Salomon’s effects to obtain substantial investment banking and advisory fees.<br />
236. In each <strong>of</strong> its WorldCom reports, Salomon stated a “reason for the<br />
report.” <strong>The</strong> stated reason for the report was false and misleading because it failed<br />
to disclose the true reason Salomon issued each report was to assist Salomon in its<br />
efforts to obtain investment banking fees.<br />
237. Salomon’s WorldCom analyst reports were false and misleading<br />
because Salomon failed to disclose in those analyst reports that it based its<br />
decisions as to which companies to cover in analysts reports and as to what it<br />
80<br />
COMPLAINT