16.10.2014 Views

the CAA said - Heathrow Airport

the CAA said - Heathrow Airport

the CAA said - Heathrow Airport

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CAP 1027<br />

Chapter 8: The Q6 Regulatory Asset Base<br />

C H A P T E R 8<br />

T h e Q 6 R e g u l a t o r y A s s e t B a s e<br />

8.1 A calculation of <strong>the</strong> RAB is required in order to derive two important<br />

elements of <strong>the</strong> price cap, <strong>the</strong> depreciation charge and <strong>the</strong> WACC<br />

charge. This chapter sets out <strong>the</strong> <strong>CAA</strong>’s analysis of HAL’s RAB and<br />

hence <strong>the</strong> depreciation charge to apply in Q6. The WACC is<br />

discussed in detail in chapter 9.<br />

8.2 The <strong>CAA</strong>’s Q5 decision set out how <strong>the</strong> <strong>CAA</strong> intended to calculate <strong>the</strong><br />

closing RAB for Q5. Q5 started with <strong>the</strong> RAB value at <strong>the</strong> close of Q4,<br />

plus or minus movements within Q5 to give a closing RAB value for<br />

Q5. No formulae were set out as to how <strong>the</strong> RAB would be rolled<br />

forward for Q5+1, although <strong>the</strong> Q5 decision provides guidance on <strong>the</strong><br />

principles. The closing RAB value for Q5+1 is taken as <strong>the</strong> opening<br />

value for Q6.<br />

Constructive Engagement<br />

8.3 Given <strong>the</strong> consensus between HAL and <strong>the</strong> airlines on <strong>the</strong> use of a<br />

RAB-based methodology, <strong>the</strong>re was little discussion about <strong>the</strong><br />

mechanics on how to roll forward <strong>the</strong> RAB for Q6.<br />

8.4 There was discussion within <strong>the</strong> capital efficiency workstream on<br />

whe<strong>the</strong>r an adjustment should be made to <strong>the</strong> opening RAB to reflect<br />

potential inefficiencies in HAL’s process for <strong>the</strong> T3IB project in Q5<br />

(see chapter 13 for details).<br />

HAL’s January 2013 Business Plan<br />

8.5 Figure 8.1 sets out HAL’s calculation of <strong>the</strong> reconciliation between <strong>the</strong><br />

opening Q5 RAB and <strong>the</strong> opening Q6 RAB.<br />

April 2013 Page 108

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!