16.10.2014 Views

Q6 Full Business Plan - Heathrow Airport

Q6 Full Business Plan - Heathrow Airport

Q6 Full Business Plan - Heathrow Airport

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5. Aeronautical charges<br />

Table 5.1 shows the indicative price profile for delivering<br />

the outcomes we describe above. Using the same<br />

methodology as for the Q5 calculation, the value of ‘X’<br />

in <strong>Q6</strong> is 5.9%.<br />

The investments <strong>Heathrow</strong> makes have lives well beyond<br />

<strong>Q6</strong>, and so it is important to look also at the implications<br />

of the <strong>Q6</strong> plans for future quinquennia. We have not<br />

attempted any detailed modelling over this longer term<br />

time horizon, but Table 5.1 gives illustrative projections,<br />

assuming capital expenditure of just over £4.5 billion in<br />

Q7. Although tentative, these projections do illustrate<br />

that real aeronautical charges will fall between <strong>Q6</strong> and<br />

Q7, from an average £24.56/passenger in <strong>Q6</strong> to £23.03/<br />

passenger in Q7. The change in the value of ‘X’ is even<br />

more pronounced from X=5.9% in <strong>Q6</strong> to X=-5.8% in<br />

Q7, due to the ‘over-shooting’ property of the ‘X’<br />

calculation where below/above returns at the beginning<br />

of a quinquennia need to be profiled by above/below<br />

returns at the end of the period.<br />

Alternatively, the price could be adjusted by using an<br />

initial adjustment (known as a P 0<br />

adjustment) to address<br />

the shortfall in passenger numbers in Q5, leaving the<br />

value of ‘X’ to account for <strong>Q6</strong> factors only. Table 5.1 also<br />

shows this alternative price path where an initial<br />

adjustment of 10% is made to prices at the start of <strong>Q6</strong><br />

(roughly the amount needed to adjust for the lower than<br />

anticipated passenger numbers at the start of <strong>Q6</strong>),<br />

followed by a lower level of ‘X’ of 2.6% in subsequent<br />

years. The value of ‘X’ is lower under this profile because<br />

it no longer needs to absorb the impact of the resetting<br />

of the passenger forecast. The price profile for both<br />

these options is shown in Figure 5.2.<br />

<strong>Heathrow</strong> is also considering the potential to realign<br />

regulatory and financial years. This would significantly<br />

enhance transparency between regulatory and statutory<br />

accounts. The implications of this are to reduce the <strong>Q6</strong><br />

value of ‘X’ from 5.9% to 5.4% due to the cash flow<br />

benefit of bringing forward price revisions from April to<br />

January.<br />

In the following sections we describe the major factors<br />

that influence the aeronautical charge level and profile.<br />

Page 40 <strong>Heathrow</strong> <strong>Q6</strong> <strong>Full</strong> <strong>Business</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> - Public version | Chapter 5 © <strong>Heathrow</strong> <strong>Airport</strong> Limited 2013

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!