18.10.2014 Views

FIRE EFFECTS GUIDE - National Wildfire Coordinating Group

FIRE EFFECTS GUIDE - National Wildfire Coordinating Group

FIRE EFFECTS GUIDE - National Wildfire Coordinating Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

and endangered species lists. Species of specialized adaptability are<br />

commonly termed specialists, of low versatility (Maser et al. 1984),<br />

obligates (Kindschy 1986) of a particular habitat component, or<br />

stenotopic (Knopf et al. 1988). Hammond's flycatcher (Empidonax<br />

hammondii) has very narrow food and cover requirements (Maser et al.<br />

1984). The sage grouse (Centrocercus europhasianus) and pinyon jay<br />

are considered obligates of sagebrush and pinyon-juniper woodland<br />

respectively (Kindschy 1986, Hardy 1945). Allen (1987) notes that many<br />

furbearers of forested and wetland cover types have specific habitat<br />

requirements and are less resilient in adapting to habitat modifications.<br />

Specialists commonly can be eliminated by loss of a single habitat<br />

component. Species of intermediate adaptability such as robins (Turdus<br />

migratorius) and red-wing blackbirds (Agelaius phoeniceus) are referred<br />

to as mesotopic (Knopf et al. 1988). Knopf et al. (1988) separated<br />

riparian avifauna into eurytopic, mesotopic, and stenotopic guilds to<br />

accommodate variations in habitat sensitivity.<br />

d. Food and cover. The two most visually obvious determinants of<br />

habitat suitability are food and cover.<br />

(1) Dense timber travel lanes are frequently preferred by elk (Cervus<br />

elaphus). Sagebrush can reach heights and densities that inhibit or<br />

prevent pronghorn movement. Voles (Microtus montanus;<br />

Clethrionomys gapperi) require certain litter layer or woody debris<br />

habitat components. Birds require various structural conditions for nest<br />

sites, hunting and song perches. Some species (e.g., the white-tail<br />

deer) select for denser woody vegetation. Species such as bighorn<br />

sheep or pronghorn normally select against it (Lyon et al. 1978, McGee<br />

1982, Yoakum 1980).<br />

(2) One species may consume primarily grass and forbs (e. g.,<br />

grasshoppers or elk), another mostly forbs and shrubs (e.g., sage<br />

grouse or pronghorn) and yet another, such as turkey (Meleagris<br />

gallopavo), may make heavy use of mast. Hobbs (1989) provides a<br />

strong case that the habitat mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) need for<br />

thermal cover correlates well with the nutritional plane of the animal.<br />

Hobbs and others have noted the inherent value of forage diversity and<br />

availability. Hobbs and Spowart (1984) found substantially improved<br />

winter diet quality for both deer and bighorn sheep as a result of burning<br />

although there were only relatively small changes in the quality of<br />

individual forages. They attributed the diet quality increase to improved<br />

availability of forage items and enhanced forage selection opportunities.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!