18.10.2014 Views

FIRE EFFECTS GUIDE - National Wildfire Coordinating Group

FIRE EFFECTS GUIDE - National Wildfire Coordinating Group

FIRE EFFECTS GUIDE - National Wildfire Coordinating Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1. General Need for Improved Management. "Prescribed fire should not be a<br />

substitute for good range management. A problem rooted in inappropriate range<br />

management practices may not be corrected by vegetation treatment. In these<br />

instances management should be altered prior to application of prescribed fire. If<br />

livestock have premature access to the burn, the full benefits of the prescribed fire<br />

may not be realized and negative impacts may occur unless management of the<br />

livestock is included in the plan" (Bunting et al. 1987). "Followup management is<br />

the most important aspect of a controlled burn and must be provided for in the<br />

overall management plan" (Smith 1981). "Grazing management following burning<br />

may significantly affect the degree of change in forage species productivity and<br />

possibly the composition of the postburn vegetation" (Smith et al. 1985). The need<br />

for management of livestock use on a burned area is most critical the first growing<br />

season after fire, particularly in plant communities of arid and semiarid regions<br />

(Trlica 1977). Livestock use must be managed on the sites of both prescribed fires<br />

and wildfires.<br />

Fire results in changes of animal behavior including grazing pattern, preferences,<br />

utilization rates, forage consumption, and frequency of grazing use. Wild and<br />

domestic animals are attracted to recently burned areas resulting in greater<br />

utilization of the burned area than surrounding vegetation (Pase and Granfelt 1971;<br />

Bunting et al. 1987). Cattle, horses, and sheep usually have the greatest impact.<br />

Grazing animals frequently concentrate on a burn because the herbage or browse<br />

is more accessible, palatable, and nutritious (Wright and Bailey 1982). Plant<br />

growing points may also be exposed, increasing the likelihood of damage from a<br />

foraging animal. Carbohydrate reserves of sprouting plants are usually depleted<br />

because of energy required to regenerate after a fire. Repeated use of these plants<br />

can cause considerably reduced vigor, and sometimes death of key forage or<br />

browse species. (See VI.B.4.b. (1) and (2), this Guide, for a more detailed<br />

discussion of carbohydrate reserves.)<br />

Grazing in forested areas can help forest regeneration if competing plant species<br />

are grazed, or hinder regeneration if tree seedlings or sprouts are eaten or<br />

trampled. Extensive damage to young conifers from trampling has occurred in<br />

clearcut areas that were seeded to grasses (McLean and Clark in Urness 1985),<br />

and has been observed in burned clearcuts where postfire growth of grasses and<br />

sedges attracted livestock (Zimmerman 1990). The presence of larger diameter<br />

logging slash can discourage livestock and big game use.<br />

2. Rest and Deferment.<br />

a. Prefire. Prefire rest from grazing is required on many range sites to allow the<br />

accumulation of enough fine fuel to carry the fire. This is important in shrub/grass<br />

and pinyon-juniper types as well as in forested areas, particularly aspen<br />

ecosystems where grass and shrub litter may be the main carrier fuels (Jones and<br />

DeByle 1985). Allowing grazing, sometimes even for a short period of time during<br />

the year before the fire, can remove enough fuel to limit fire spread. A patchy fire<br />

may occur, or the fire may not be able to carry at all, and in both cases fire<br />

treatment objectives are not met. Prefire rest may also be required to restore levels

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!