Baseline Study Report on CQ of WAB final - International ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

4.5 Time Series Data and Future Projections It has been seen that the land area and the production for the cultivation of various crops has been decreasing as given below: Table 24: Trend in Land Use and Production Average Average Cultivation Land area in Ana Production in Kg Change % Change % Rice 6,299 6,299 5,837 -3.7% 136,735 134,642 110,745 -9.6% Wheat 2,734 2,738 2,442 -5.3% 20,065 20,570 13,885 -15.0% Maize 117 117 117 0.0% 551 595 365 -15.3% Veg 7,920 7,926 7,634 -1.8% 1,670,091 1,712,905 1,678,063 0.3% Therefore, the projections of the WAB from farm land for 2 years are estimated as given in the following table: Table 25: Present and Projection of WAB from Farm Land Estimate for Year Quantity for % Change S. No. Type of WAB in Tons 2009 in Tons per year 2010 2011 1 Rice Straw 861.994 -3.7% 830.100 799.386 2 Wheat straw 147.982 -5.3% 140.139 132.712 3 Maize stalks 4.385 0.0% 4.385 4.385 4 Waste 2,021.639 -4.1% vegetables 1,938.752 1,859.263 Total 3,036 2,913.376 2,795.746 It is expected that the processing industries will remain the same in the project area. But the commercial market of the agricultural products is expending and it is estimated that the volume and the market size will increase by two times the existing volume and hence the WAB generation will also be triple of the current amount. 18
The present as well as the future projection of WAB from all the three sectors is presented below: S. No. Type of WAB Table 26: Present and Projection of WAB from all Sectors Quantity (2009) in Tons Estimate for Year in Tons % Change per year 2010 2011 From Farm Land 1 Rice Straw 861.994 -3.7% 830.100 799.386 2 Wheat straw 147.982 -5.3% 140.139 132.712 3 Maize stalks 4.385 0.0% 4.385 4.385 4 Waste vegetables 2,021.639 -4.1% 1,938.752 1859.263 From Processing Facility 5 Rice Husk from 744.000 744.000 - 744 Processing Units From Commercial Facility Waste 6 Vegetables from 459.000 153.000 2 times per year 306 Commercial Facility Total 4,033.999 3,963,376 3,998.746 Figure 3: Surplus WAB in MTM for 2009 19
Page 1 and 2: Baseline S
Page 3 and 4: List of Tables Table 1: Selection o
Page 5 and 6: 1. Introduction 1.1 Background Biom
Page 7 and 8: 1.5 Approach and Methodology The ap
Page 9 and 10: Ward No. Total No. of Agricultural
Page 11 and 12: 2. Information on the Project Area
Page 13 and 14: More than 65 percent of the househo
Page 15 and 16: 16 as the highest proportion. Besid
Page 17 and 18: The above table shows that in the f
Page 19 and 20: The data collected from the rice mi
Page 21: 4.2 From Processing Facilities Tota
Page 25 and 26: 5. Characterization of the Waste Ag
Page 27 and 28: Waste Stream Table 30: Overall Stat
Page 29: Reference UNEP, 2009a. Converting W

Baseline Study Report on CQ of WAB final - International ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?