download
download
download
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Changing structures<br />
• CECET’s data analyst will review all data on a regular basis<br />
with a view to identifying areas of strength and weakness,<br />
and in particular areas requiring intervention.<br />
All of these mechanisms will be designed to provide CECET’s<br />
Directors with an accurate assessment of the performance of each<br />
academy within the CECET umbrella.<br />
Powers of Intervention<br />
A novel and unique difference from the usual umbrella trust is<br />
that CECET will be able to take direct action through powers of<br />
intervention to address underperformance and introduce steps<br />
to improve standards.<br />
It is envisaged that interventions will be applied on a sliding<br />
scale, depending on the nature of the issues to be addressed,<br />
with areas for potential intervention grouped according to<br />
the four areas currently inspected by Ofsted: achievement of<br />
pupils; quality of teaching; behaviour and safety of pupils; and<br />
leadership and management. Various ‘trigger points’ will be used<br />
to trigger use of the powers of intervention and the nature of the<br />
interventions could involve:<br />
If one thing is<br />
certain in this rapidly<br />
changing education<br />
environment, it is that<br />
there will a growing<br />
need for alternative<br />
provision delivered<br />
through arrangements<br />
that can provide<br />
overarching strategic<br />
support<br />
• Deploying a task group (which would include as a minimum<br />
accredited Ofsted inspectors) into an academy in order to<br />
investigate particular issues or concerns, or to determine the<br />
extent and nature of intervention required;<br />
• Issuing a formal warning note to the Directors of a SAT or<br />
MAT, requiring them to take remedial action in respect of<br />
school performance, or other matter of concern (including<br />
instituting capability or disciplinary action against the<br />
Principal and/or other members of staff);<br />
• Requiring the Directors of a MAT to remove or limit powers<br />
of delegation to a local governing body (LGB) within the<br />
MAT, or in extremis to remove the LGB;<br />
• Removing CECET-appointed Directors in a SAT or MAT.<br />
Conclusion<br />
If one thing is certain in this rapidly changing education<br />
environment, it is that there will a growing need for alternative<br />
provision delivered through arrangements that can provide<br />
overarching strategic support. The successful implementation<br />
of CECET will depend on its ability to co-ordinate and combine<br />
the expertise effectively and resources within the arrangement in<br />
order to deliver integrated, strategic and continuously improving<br />
services.<br />
Christopher Whittington is a partner at<br />
Geldards LLP and Colin Hopkins, Director of<br />
Education for Lichfield Diocese, the second<br />
largest education diocese in the country<br />
with 104 schools.<br />
Summer 2014 | 73