24.10.2014 Views

download

download

download

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Changing structures<br />

• CECET’s data analyst will review all data on a regular basis<br />

with a view to identifying areas of strength and weakness,<br />

and in particular areas requiring intervention.<br />

All of these mechanisms will be designed to provide CECET’s<br />

Directors with an accurate assessment of the performance of each<br />

academy within the CECET umbrella.<br />

Powers of Intervention<br />

A novel and unique difference from the usual umbrella trust is<br />

that CECET will be able to take direct action through powers of<br />

intervention to address underperformance and introduce steps<br />

to improve standards.<br />

It is envisaged that interventions will be applied on a sliding<br />

scale, depending on the nature of the issues to be addressed,<br />

with areas for potential intervention grouped according to<br />

the four areas currently inspected by Ofsted: achievement of<br />

pupils; quality of teaching; behaviour and safety of pupils; and<br />

leadership and management. Various ‘trigger points’ will be used<br />

to trigger use of the powers of intervention and the nature of the<br />

interventions could involve:<br />

If one thing is<br />

certain in this rapidly<br />

changing education<br />

environment, it is that<br />

there will a growing<br />

need for alternative<br />

provision delivered<br />

through arrangements<br />

that can provide<br />

overarching strategic<br />

support<br />

• Deploying a task group (which would include as a minimum<br />

accredited Ofsted inspectors) into an academy in order to<br />

investigate particular issues or concerns, or to determine the<br />

extent and nature of intervention required;<br />

• Issuing a formal warning note to the Directors of a SAT or<br />

MAT, requiring them to take remedial action in respect of<br />

school performance, or other matter of concern (including<br />

instituting capability or disciplinary action against the<br />

Principal and/or other members of staff);<br />

• Requiring the Directors of a MAT to remove or limit powers<br />

of delegation to a local governing body (LGB) within the<br />

MAT, or in extremis to remove the LGB;<br />

• Removing CECET-appointed Directors in a SAT or MAT.<br />

Conclusion<br />

If one thing is certain in this rapidly changing education<br />

environment, it is that there will a growing need for alternative<br />

provision delivered through arrangements that can provide<br />

overarching strategic support. The successful implementation<br />

of CECET will depend on its ability to co-ordinate and combine<br />

the expertise effectively and resources within the arrangement in<br />

order to deliver integrated, strategic and continuously improving<br />

services.<br />

Christopher Whittington is a partner at<br />

Geldards LLP and Colin Hopkins, Director of<br />

Education for Lichfield Diocese, the second<br />

largest education diocese in the country<br />

with 104 schools.<br />

Summer 2014 | 73

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!