download
download
download
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Finance<br />
Sensible accounting will protect<br />
against media headlines<br />
Proper audit procedures should protect<br />
academies from accusations of ‘profiteering’,<br />
say UK200Group members<br />
A<br />
recent report in the Guardian highlighted how a small<br />
number of academies are paying millions of pounds into<br />
the private businesses of directors, trustees and their<br />
relatives.<br />
And while some have urged the Government to look closely at<br />
the practice to ensure there are no conflicts of interest, members<br />
of the Academy Forum of the UK200Group of independent<br />
chartered accountants and lawyers say that adequate accounting<br />
systems and audits should protect academies from any<br />
accusations of wrong doing.<br />
Furthermore the UK200Group say the intervention of private<br />
businesses into the academy sector should actually be welcomed.<br />
Members of the Academy Forum represent a large proportion<br />
of academy schools in the UK, with a recent survey indicating<br />
member firms now act for 10.5% of the academies market.<br />
Kevin Hopper, academy partner at UK200Group member<br />
firm Forrester Boyd, says that while they recognise the practice is a<br />
relatively small issue, proper audits should identify any serious risks.<br />
He said: “It is always concerning that the large academy chains<br />
are paying related companies/individuals monies for services,<br />
which could be seen as profiting out of public money.<br />
“However, with the external audits that are completed, the<br />
auditor should be aware of this and it should be part of their<br />
audit work to review this area.<br />
“Also due to the nature of the relation, it should also be a<br />
relatively high risk area for the auditor, which would mean extra<br />
focus for their audit work, including reviewing who the related<br />
parties of an academy are and testing the associated systems,<br />
controls and tendering processes.<br />
“Therefore if the audit is completed correctly and on a risk<br />
basis then increased scrutiny in this area should not be required.<br />
“This issue therefore is around the auditor understanding the<br />
academy itself, and this is why having an auditor with experience<br />
is preferable.<br />
“The change by the EFA in respect of the transactions with<br />
related parties, in which transactions cannot be completed at<br />
profit, should also minimise the concern in this area.<br />
“In summary these issues are concerning, but there should<br />
be adequate procedures in place to ensure that profiteering of<br />
academies does not happen, but unfortunately there will always<br />
be someone who still manages it.”<br />
Rob Stokes, from UK200Group member firm Randall &<br />
Payne says the intervention by private firms into the academy<br />
sector is actually a positive move.<br />
He said: “The focus should be on the governance procedures<br />
put in place by the academy to ensure that the expenditure,<br />
whether or not with a related party, is getting the best value for<br />
the academy, and that the purchasing/tendering systems put in<br />
place are appropriate to assist in this and consistently followed.<br />
In terms of this then being checked, the academies’ auditors<br />
should be made aware of these procedures, and having also been<br />
made aware of the related party transactions that the academy<br />
has undertaken, will direct their key testing to be around the<br />
appropriate controls and value for money.<br />
“Rather than being a cause for concern the fact that more<br />
private sector businesses are venturing into the education sector<br />
to provide goods and services could be looked upon as another<br />
positive for the academy sector. Those who have directors who<br />
are also governors of academies will have more of an insight into<br />
the services that the academies require and how best to utilise<br />
them once they have been offered.<br />
“Rather than focusing on the amount of money being<br />
expended by academies into the private sector and particularly<br />
to related parties there should be a primary focus on academies<br />
defining what gives best value for them. The follow up focus<br />
should then be on the academies putting in place procedures and<br />
controls that are implemented to ensure that conflicts of interest<br />
are removed, and that their value for money statement is capable<br />
of being monitored by third parties.”<br />
UK200 Academy forum member Joanne Baldwin, partner at<br />
Nicklin LLP, says stricter guidelines on tendering and contracts<br />
should increase the focus on related party transactions.<br />
“The figures highlighted in the article are of concern<br />
and could be an indication of public funds being spent<br />
inappropriately although it is difficult to confirm without<br />
additional information. As academies, the schools themselves<br />
86 | Summer 2014