24.10.2014 Views

download

download

download

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Finance<br />

Sensible accounting will protect<br />

against media headlines<br />

Proper audit procedures should protect<br />

academies from accusations of ‘profiteering’,<br />

say UK200Group members<br />

A<br />

recent report in the Guardian highlighted how a small<br />

number of academies are paying millions of pounds into<br />

the private businesses of directors, trustees and their<br />

relatives.<br />

And while some have urged the Government to look closely at<br />

the practice to ensure there are no conflicts of interest, members<br />

of the Academy Forum of the UK200Group of independent<br />

chartered accountants and lawyers say that adequate accounting<br />

systems and audits should protect academies from any<br />

accusations of wrong doing.<br />

Furthermore the UK200Group say the intervention of private<br />

businesses into the academy sector should actually be welcomed.<br />

Members of the Academy Forum represent a large proportion<br />

of academy schools in the UK, with a recent survey indicating<br />

member firms now act for 10.5% of the academies market.<br />

Kevin Hopper, academy partner at UK200Group member<br />

firm Forrester Boyd, says that while they recognise the practice is a<br />

relatively small issue, proper audits should identify any serious risks.<br />

He said: “It is always concerning that the large academy chains<br />

are paying related companies/individuals monies for services,<br />

which could be seen as profiting out of public money.<br />

“However, with the external audits that are completed, the<br />

auditor should be aware of this and it should be part of their<br />

audit work to review this area.<br />

“Also due to the nature of the relation, it should also be a<br />

relatively high risk area for the auditor, which would mean extra<br />

focus for their audit work, including reviewing who the related<br />

parties of an academy are and testing the associated systems,<br />

controls and tendering processes.<br />

“Therefore if the audit is completed correctly and on a risk<br />

basis then increased scrutiny in this area should not be required.<br />

“This issue therefore is around the auditor understanding the<br />

academy itself, and this is why having an auditor with experience<br />

is preferable.<br />

“The change by the EFA in respect of the transactions with<br />

related parties, in which transactions cannot be completed at<br />

profit, should also minimise the concern in this area.<br />

“In summary these issues are concerning, but there should<br />

be adequate procedures in place to ensure that profiteering of<br />

academies does not happen, but unfortunately there will always<br />

be someone who still manages it.”<br />

Rob Stokes, from UK200Group member firm Randall &<br />

Payne says the intervention by private firms into the academy<br />

sector is actually a positive move.<br />

He said: “The focus should be on the governance procedures<br />

put in place by the academy to ensure that the expenditure,<br />

whether or not with a related party, is getting the best value for<br />

the academy, and that the purchasing/tendering systems put in<br />

place are appropriate to assist in this and consistently followed.<br />

In terms of this then being checked, the academies’ auditors<br />

should be made aware of these procedures, and having also been<br />

made aware of the related party transactions that the academy<br />

has undertaken, will direct their key testing to be around the<br />

appropriate controls and value for money.<br />

“Rather than being a cause for concern the fact that more<br />

private sector businesses are venturing into the education sector<br />

to provide goods and services could be looked upon as another<br />

positive for the academy sector. Those who have directors who<br />

are also governors of academies will have more of an insight into<br />

the services that the academies require and how best to utilise<br />

them once they have been offered.<br />

“Rather than focusing on the amount of money being<br />

expended by academies into the private sector and particularly<br />

to related parties there should be a primary focus on academies<br />

defining what gives best value for them. The follow up focus<br />

should then be on the academies putting in place procedures and<br />

controls that are implemented to ensure that conflicts of interest<br />

are removed, and that their value for money statement is capable<br />

of being monitored by third parties.”<br />

UK200 Academy forum member Joanne Baldwin, partner at<br />

Nicklin LLP, says stricter guidelines on tendering and contracts<br />

should increase the focus on related party transactions.<br />

“The figures highlighted in the article are of concern<br />

and could be an indication of public funds being spent<br />

inappropriately although it is difficult to confirm without<br />

additional information. As academies, the schools themselves<br />

86 | Summer 2014

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!