28.10.2014 Views

Download Electronic Version - UDC Law Review

Download Electronic Version - UDC Law Review

Download Electronic Version - UDC Law Review

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

MILLENNIUM SHOWDOWN FOR PUBLIC INTEREST LAW 11<br />

In 1971, the United States Supreme Court affirmed a Virginia district court<br />

decision enjoining a scenario similar to the one the Alabama court declined to<br />

enjoin. 69 The Virginia district court enjoined the upgrade of a historically white<br />

two-year institution to a four-year institution. 70 As a four-year institution, the<br />

historically white college would compete with the historically black college for<br />

students?1 The district court reasoned that Green protected public college students<br />

from discrimination as clearly as it protects public elementary and high<br />

school students. 72 Norris charged states to affirmatively eliminate the "vestiges of<br />

their previously de jure segregated college systems. ,,73<br />

In 1973, a group of plaintiffs from several states sued the United States Department<br />

of Health Education and Welfare (HEW) to force agency enforcement<br />

of the Title VI requirement that states file desegregation plans for institutions of<br />

higher education?4 In the four years since the original request, ten states failed<br />

to comply with the requirement. 75 Mississippi, a non-complying state, had eight<br />

public colleges and universities, three black and five white. 76 Three of the white<br />

institutions received greater funding and offered more programming than the historically<br />

black colleges. 77 Two of the historically black colleges and two of the<br />

historically white schools were considered regional schools dedicated to undergraduate<br />

preparation?8 The surviving historically black institution had a limited<br />

research focus and was considered urban. 79 The university trustees filed a plan in<br />

response to HEW pressure but lacked the finances to implement the plan for<br />

approximately three years. 80 Black plaintiffs, frustrated by the lack of progress<br />

toward desegregation of the university system, sued the university to obtain the<br />

enforcement of their right to equal education in United States v. Fordice. 81<br />

In Fordice, the Court determined that segregated systems exist where there are<br />

duplicated resources and programs between single race profiles with no sound<br />

educational justification for the single race status. 82 Mississippi could demonstrate<br />

no significant effort to eliminate de jure segregation in state institutions of<br />

higher learning. 83 Because the historically black colleges existed contemporane-<br />

69 Washburn, supra note 36, at 1136-37 (citing Board of Visitors v. Norris, 404 U.S. 907 (1971».<br />

70 Norris v. State Council of Higher Ed., 327 F. Supp. 1368 (E.D. Va. 1971).<br />

71 Washburn, supra note 36, at 1137.<br />

72 [d. at 1137-38.<br />

73 Washburn, supra note 36, at 1137.<br />

74 [d. at 1139-1140.<br />

75 [d.<br />

76 [d.<br />

77 [d. at 1141<br />

78 Washburn, supra note 36, at 1141.<br />

79 [d.<br />

80 [d., United States v. Fordice, 505 U.S. 717 (1992).<br />

81 Washburn, supra note 36, at 1135-45; Fordice, 505 U.S. 717.<br />

82 Wenglinsky, supra note 6.<br />

83 Washburn, supra note 36, at 1148.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!