advances-in-protein-chemistry

More documents

Recommendations

Info

34. Wang Y, Addess KJ, Chen J, Geer LY, He J, et al. (2007) MMDB: annotating protein sequences with Entrez’s 3D-structure database. Nucleic Acids Res 35: D298-300. 35. Madej T, Addess KJ, Fong JH, Geer LY, Geer RC, et al. (2012) MMDB: 3D structures and macromolecular interactions. Nucleic Acids Res 40: D461-464. 36. Gibrat JF, Madej T, Bryant SH (1996) Surprising similarities in structure comparison. Curr Opin Struct Biol 6: 377-385. 37. Wang Y, Geer LY, Chappey C, Kans JA, Bryant SH (2000) Cn3D: sequence and structure views for Entrez. Trends Biochem Sci 25: 300-302. 38. Sali A, Blundell TL (1993) Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. J Mol Biol 234: 779-815. 39. Smith TF, Waterman MS (1981) Identification of common molecular subsequences. J Mol Biol 147: 195-197. 40. Eswar N, Webb B, Marti-Renom MA, Madhusudhan MS, Eramian D, et al. (2007) Comparative protein structure modeling using MODELLER. Curr Protoc Protein Sci Chapter 2: Unit 2. 41. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schäffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, et al. (1997) Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 25: 3389-3402. 42. Marti-Renom MA, Madhusudhan MS, Sali A (2004) Alignment of protein sequences by their profiles. Protein Sci 13: 1071-1087. 43. Shen MY, Sali A (2006) Statistical potential for assessment and prediction of protein structures. Protein Sci 15: 2507-2524. 44. Melo F, Sali A (2007) Fold assessment for comparative protein structure modeling. Protein Sci 16: 2412-2426. 45. Eramian D, Eswar N, Shen MY, Sali A (2008) How well can the accuracy of comparative protein structure models be predicted? Protein Sci 17: 1881-1893. 46. http://salilab.org/modbase/statistics 47. Bairoch A, Apweiler R, Wu CH, Barker WC, Boeckmann B, et al. (2005) The Universal Protein Resource (UniProt). Nucleic Acids Res 33: D154-159. 48. Benson DA, Karsch-Mizrachi I, Lipman DJ, Ostell J, Sayers EW (2010) GenBank. Nucleic Acids Res 38: D46-51. 49. Henrick K, Feng Z, Bluhm WF, Dimitropoulos D, Doreleijers JF, et al. (2008) Remediation of the protein data bank archive. Nucleic Acids Res 36: D426-433. 50. Pieper U, Webb BM, Barkan DT, Schneidman-Duhovny D, Schlessinger A, et al. (2011) ModBase, a database of annotated comparative protein structure models, and associated resources. Nucleic Acids Res 39: D465-474. 51. Kiefer F, Arnold K, Künzli M, Bordoli L, Schwede T (2009) The SWISS-MODEL Repository and associated resources. Nucleic Acids Res 37: D387-392. 52. http://swissmodel.expasy.org/workspace/ 53. Browne WJ, North AC, Phillips DC, Brew K, Vanaman TC, et al. (1969) A possible three-dimensional structure of bovine alpha-lactalbumin based on that of hen’s egg-white lysozyme. J Mol Biol 42: 65-86. 54. Warme PK, Momany FA, Rumball SV, Tuttle RW, Scheraga HA (1974) Computation of structures of homologous proteins. Alpha-lactalbumin from lysozyme. Biochemistry 13: 768-782. 55. May AC, Blundell TL (1994) Automated comparative modelling of protein structures. Curr Opin Biotechnol 5: 355-360. 56. McLachlan AD, Shotton DM (1971) Structural similarities between alpha-lytic protease of Myxobacter 495 and elastase. Nat New Biol 229: 202-205. 57. Brayer GD, Delbaere LT, James MN (1979) Molecular structure of the alpha-lytic protease from Myxobacter 495 at 2.8 Angstroms resolution. J Mol Biol 131: 743-775. 58. Greer J (1980) Model for haptoglobin heavy chain based upon structural homology. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 77: 3393-3397. 59. Greer J (1981) Comparative model-building of the mammalian serine proteases. J Mol Biol 153: 1027-1042. 60. Carlson W, Handschumacher M, Karplus M, Haber E (1984) Studies of the three-dimensional structure of human renin and its inhibitors. J Hypertens Suppl 2: S281-284. 61. Carlson W, Karplus M, Haber E (1985) Construction of a model for the three-dimensional structure of human renal renin. Hypertension 7: 13-26. 62. Akahane K, Umeyama H, Nakagawa S, Moriguchi I, Hirose S, et al. (1985) Three-dimensional structure of human renin. Hypertension 7: 3-12. 63. Frazao C, Topham C, Dhanaraj V, Blundell TL (1994) Comparative modelling of human renin: A retrospective evaluation of the model with respect to the X-ray crystal structure. Pure & Appl. Chem. 66: 43-50. 64. Hutchins C, Greer J (1991) Comparative modeling of proteins in the design of novel renin inhibitors. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol 26: 77-127. 65. Azim MK 1999: http://eprints.hec.gov.pk/937/1/671.html.htm 66. Jones TA (1978) A graphics model building and refinement system for macromolecules. J. Appl. Cryst. 11: 268-72. 67. Wallner B, Elofsson A (2005) All are not equal: a benchmark of different homology modeling programs. Protein Sci 14: 1315-1327. 68. Schwede T, Kopp J, Guex N, Peitsch MC (2003) SWISS-MODEL: An automated protein homology-modeling server. Nucleic Acids Res 31: 3381-3385. 69. Wallner B, Elofsson A (2005) All are not equal: a benchmark of different homology modeling programs. Protein Sci 14: 1315-1327. 70. Sánchez R, Sali A (1997) Advances in comparative protein-structure modelling. Curr Opin Struct Biol 7: 206-214. 71. Martí-Renom MA, Stuart AC, Fiser A, Sánchez R, Melo F, et al. (2000) Comparative protein structure modeling of genes and genomes. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 29: 291-325. 72. Tramontano A, Leplae R, Morea V (2001) Analysis and assessment of comparative modeling predictions in CASP4. Proteins Suppl 5: 22-38. 73. http://salilab.org/modeller/manual/%20 74. Arnold K, Bordoli L, Kopp J, Schwede T (2006) The SWISS-MODEL workspace: a web-based environment for protein structure homology modelling. Bioinformatics 22: 195-201. 75. Bates PA, Kelley LA, MacCallum RM, Sternberg MJ (2001) Enhancement of protein modeling by human intervention in applying the automatic programs 3D-JIGSAW and 3D-PSSM. Proteins Suppl 5: 39-46. 76. Melo F, Feytmans E (1998) Assessing protein structures with a non-local atomic interaction energy. J Mol Biol 277: 1141-1152. 77. van Gunsteren WF, Billeter SR, Eising AA, Hünenberger PH (1996) Biomolecular Simulations: The GROMOS96 Manual and User Guide. Zürich: VdF Hochschulverlag ETHZ. 78. Eisenberg D, Lüthy R, Bowie JU (1997) VERIFY3D: assessment of protein models with three-dimensional profiles. Methods Enzymol 277: 396-404. 79. Hooft RW, Vriend G, Sander C, Abola EE (1996) Errors in protein structures. Nature 381: 272. OMICS Group eBooks 020
80. Laskowski RA, MacArthur MW, Moss DS, Thornton JM (1993) PROCHECK-a program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures. J. Appl. Cryst 26: 283–291. 81. Wesson L, Eisenberg D (1992) Atomic solvation parameters applied to molecular dynamics of proteins in solution. Protein Sci 1: 227-235. 82. Bates PA, Sternberg MJ (1999) Model building by comparison at CASP3: using expert knowledge and computer automation. Proteins Suppl 3: 47-54. 83. Söding J (2005) Protein homology detection by HMM-HMM comparison. Bioinformatics 21: 951-960. 84. Kim DE, Chivian D, Baker D (2004) Protein structure prediction and analysis using the Robetta server. Nucleic Acids Res 32: W526-531. 85. Bowers PM, Strauss CE, Baker D (2000) De novo protein structure determination using sparse NMR data. J Biomol NMR 18: 311-318. 86. Meiler J, Baker D (2003) Rapid protein fold determination using unassigned NMR data. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100: 15404-15409. 87. Chivian D, Kim DE, Malmström L, Bradley P, Robertson T, et al. (2003) Automated prediction of CASP-5 structures using the Robetta server. Proteins 53 Suppl 6: 524-533. 88. Ortiz AR, Strauss CE, Olmea O (2002) MAMMOTH (matching molecular models obtained from theory): an automated method for model comparison. Protein Sci 11: 2606-2621. 89. Lambert C, Léonard N, De Bolle X, Depiereux E (2002) ESyPred3D: Prediction of proteins 3D structures. Bioinformatics 18: 1250-1256. 90. Nielsen M, Lundegaard C, Lund O, Petersen TN (2010) CPHmodels-3.0--remote homology modeling using structure-guided sequence profiles. Nucleic Acids Res 38: W576-581. 91. Jayaram B, Dhingra P, Lakhani B, Shekhar S (2012) Bhageerath-Targeting the near impossible: Pushing the frontiers of atomic models for protein tertiary structure prediction. J. Chem. Sci 124: 83–91. 92. Narang P, Bhushan K, Bose S, Jayaram B (2006) Protein structure evaluation using an all-atom energy based empirical scoring function. J Biomol Struct Dyn 23: 385-406. 93. Kuntal BK, Aparoy P, Reddanna P (2010) EasyModeller: A graphical interface to MODELLER. BMC Res Notes 3: 226. 94. Kurowski MA, Bujnicki JM (2003) GeneSilico protein structure prediction meta-server. Nucleic Acids Res 31: 3305-3307. 95. Kosinski J, Cymerman IA, Feder M, Kurowski MA, Sasin JM, et al. (2003) A “FRankenstein’s monster” approach to comparative modeling: merging the finest fragments of Fold-Recognition models and iterative model refinement aided by 3D structure evaluation. Proteins 53: 369-379. 96. Mulder NJ, Apweiler R, Attwood TK, Bairoch A, Barrell D, et al. (2003) The InterPro Database, 2003 brings increased coverage and new features. Nucleic Acids Res 31: 315-318. 97. Jones DT (1999) Protein secondary structure prediction based on position-specific scoring matrices. J Mol Biol 292: 195-202. 98. Karplus K, Karchin R, Barrett C, Tu S, Cline M, et al. (2001) What is the value added by human intervention in protein structure prediction? Proteins Suppl 5: 86-91. 99. Ouali M, King RD (2000) Cascaded multiple classifiers for secondary structure prediction. Protein Sci 9: 1162-1176. 100. Jones DT, Taylor WR, Thornton JM (1994) A model recognition approach to the prediction of all-helical membrane protein structure and topology. Biochemistry 33: 3038-3049. 101. Sonnhammer EL, von Heijne G, Krogh A (1998) A hidden Markov model for predicting transmembrane helices in protein sequences. Proc Int Conf Intell Syst Mol Biol 6: 175-182. 102. Hofmann K and Stoffel W (1993) TMbase—a database of membrane spanning proteins segments. Biol Chem Hoppe-Seyler 374, 166. 103. Xu J, Li M, Kim D, Xu Y (2003) RAPTOR: optimal protein threading by linear programming. J Bioinform Comput Biol 1: 95-117. 104. Kelley LA, MacCallum RM, Sternberg MJ (2000) Enhanced genome annotation using structural profiles in the program 3D-PSSM. J Mol Biol 299: 499-520. 105. Shi J, Blundell TL, Mizuguchi K (2001) FUGUE: sequence-structure homology recognition using environment-specific substitution tables and structuredependent gap penalties. J Mol Biol 310: 243-257. 106. Jones DT (1999) GenTHREADER: an efficient and reliable protein fold recognition method for genomic sequences. J Mol Biol 287: 797-815. 107. Rychlewski L, Jaroszewski L, Li W, Godzik A (2000) Comparison of sequence profiles. Strategies for structural predictions using sequence information. Protein Sci. 9: 232–241. 108. Karplus K, Karchin R, Barrett C, Tu S, Cline M, et al. (2001) What is the value added by human intervention in protein structure prediction? Proteins Suppl 5: 86-91. 109. Fischer D (2000) Hybrid fold recognition: combining sequence derived properties with evolutionary information. Pac Symp Biocomput . 110. Lundström J, Rychlewski L, Bujnicki J, Elofsson A (2001) Pcons: a neural-network-based consensus predictor that improves fold recognition. Protein Sci 10: 2354-2362. 111. Dunbrack RL Jr (1999) Comparative modeling of CASP3 targets using PSI-BLAST and SCWRL. Proteins Suppl 3: 81-87. 112. Lüthy R, Bowie JU, Eisenberg D (1992) Assessment of protein models with three-dimensional profiles. Nature 356: 83-85. 113. Combet C, Jambon M, Deléage G, Geourjon C (2002) Geno3D: automatic comparative molecular modelling of protein. Bioinformatics 18: 213-214. 114. Lobley A, Sadowski MI, Jones DT (2009) pGenTHREADER and pDomTHREADER: new methods for improved protein fold recognition and superfamily discrimination. Bioinformatics 25: 1761-1767. 115. Jones DT (2007) Improving the accuracy of transmembrane protein topology prediction using evolutionary information. Bioinformatics 23: 538-544. 116. Nugent T, Jones DT (2009) Transmembrane protein topology prediction using support vector machines. BMC Bioinformatics 10: 159. 117. Sodhi JS, Bryson K, McGuffin LJ, Ward JJ, Wernisch L, et al. (2004) Predicting metal-binding site residues in low-resolution structural models. J Mol Biol 342: 307-320. 118. Ward JJ, McGuffin LJ, Bryson K, Buxton BF, Jones DT (2004) The DISOPRED server for the prediction of protein disorder. Bioinformatics 20: 2138-2139. 119. Bryson K, Cozzetto D, Jones DT (2007) Computer-assisted protein domain boundary prediction using the DomPred server. Curr Protein Pept Sci 8: 181-188. 120. Lobley AE, Nugent T, Orengo CA, Jones DT (2008) FFPred: an integrated feature-based function prediction server for vertebrate proteomes. Nucleic Acids Res 36: W297-302. 121. Buchan DW, Ward SM, Lobley AE, Nugent TC, Bryson K, et al. (2010) Protein annotation and modelling servers at University College London. Nucleic Acids Res 38: W563-568. 122. Peng J, Xu J (2010) Low-homology protein threading. Bioinformatics 26: i294-300. OMICS Group eBooks 021
Page 1 and 2:
www.esciencecentral.org/ebooks Adva
Page 3 and 4:
Tyrosine Nitrated Proteins: Biochem
Page 5 and 6:
[58-61]. Protein sulfhydryls [62] a
Page 7 and 8:
2. Souza JM, Daikhin E, Yudkoff M,
Page 9 and 10:
Oligoclonality of the antibody resp
Page 11 and 12:
The Recent Methodologies of Protein
Page 13 and 14:
are due to altering protein activit
Page 15 and 16:
Figure 6: At Domain Level, Protein
Page 17 and 18:
Brownian Dynamics (BD) method Prote
Page 19 and 20:
protein demonstrate the lowest ener
Page 21 and 22:
Figure 12: Steps in Protein Prepara
Page 23 and 24:
FlexServ The flexibility of protein
Page 25 and 26:
21. van der Kamp MW, Shaw KE, Woods
Page 27 and 28:
Advances in Protein Thermodynamics
Page 29 and 30:
3. Fluorescence correlation spectro
Page 31 and 32:
Figure 3: Molecular Chaperone (Top
Page 33 and 34:
Figure 7: A Potherse is Consists of
Page 35 and 36:
Figure 12: Residue Clusters with Mu
Page 37 and 38:
Figure 16: Various Features at the
Page 39 and 40:
Figure 21: Stability of protein str
Page 41 and 42:
Advances in Protein Chemistry Chapt
Page 43 and 44:
MMPs are believed to remodel the EC
Page 45 and 46:
MMPs7 (Matrilysin, PUMP 1) A big ro
Page 47 and 48:
MMP27 (MMP-22, C-MMP) mRNAs for MMP
Page 49 and 50:
Signal transduction MMP production
Page 51 and 52:
a | Active MMPs are generated throu
Page 53 and 54: Future Perspective Research into ne
Page 55 and 56: 56. Yonemura Y, Endo Y, Fujita H, K
Page 57 and 58: 126. López-Boado YS, Wilson CL, Ho
Page 59 and 60: Proteins and Peptides- Reemergence
Page 61 and 62: Figure 3: Schematic representation
Page 63 and 64: Figure 6: Different mechanisms of c
Page 65 and 66: [30,33]. Clinical trials with autoi
Page 67 and 68: Therapeutic Proteins Figure 9: Mole
Page 69 and 70: Coming years will witness increasin
Page 71 and 72: Advances in Protein Chemistry Chapt
Page 73 and 74: purification methodology and laid t
Page 75 and 76: An overview of various purification
Page 77 and 78: Affinity chromatography (AC): The p
Page 79 and 80: molecules such as proteins. Further
Page 81 and 82: However, for proteins with poor sol
Page 83 and 84: The schematic of an HPLC instrument
Page 85 and 86: » Denaturation of all proteins giv
Page 89 and 90: the biological society access to th
Page 91 and 92: identifier, since a single macromol
Page 93 and 94: Furthermore, the initial models for
Page 95 and 96: evaluation [78], Whatcheck [79] and
Page 97 and 98: corresponding to gaps in the FR ali
Page 99 and 100: programming (IP) problem based on t
Page 101 and 102: or almost the entire target. - Temp
Page 103: 3.2.1.10 Geno3D http://geno3d-pbil.
Page 107 and 108: 165. Zhang Y, Kolinski A, Skolnick
Page 111 and 112: Figure 1: Biochemical and biophysic
Page 113 and 114: equilibrium an equilibrium concentr
Page 115 and 116: for virtually all macromolecules to
Page 117 and 118: egion) for estimating fraction or p
Page 119 and 120: etween proteins in living cells. It
Page 121 and 122: pre-requisite in understanding how
Page 123 and 124: 82. Rodger A, Marrington R, Roper D
Page 125 and 126: New Peptide Based Therapeutic Appro
Page 127 and 128: ability to selectively target cells
Page 129 and 130: 24 amino acid extracellular domain
Page 131 and 132: separation efficiency. However, use
Page 133 and 134: the peptides through acetylation an
Page 135 and 136: 63. Mesiano AJ, Beckman EJ, Russell
Page 137 and 138: Antimicrob Agents Chemother 49: 330
Page 139 and 140: Protein Detection Techniques Dennis
Page 141 and 142: technique has been applied to the i
Page 143 and 144: involves placing our protein of int
show all

advances-in-protein-chemistry

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?