advances-in-protein-chemistry

More documents

Recommendations

Info

123. Bjelic S, Aqvist J (2004) Computational prediction of structure, substrate binding mode, mechanism, and rate for a malaria protease with a novel type of active site. Biochemistry 43: 14521-14528. 124. Caffrey CR, Placha L, Barinka C, Hradilek M, Dostál J, et al. (2005) Homology modeling and SAR analysis of Schistosoma japonicum cathepsin D (SjCD) with statin inhibitors identify a unique active site steric barrier with potential for the design of specific inhibitors. Biol Chem 386: 339-349. 125. Skowronek KJ, Kosinski J, Bujnicki JM (2006) Theoretical model of restriction endonuclease HpaI in complex with DNA, predicted by fold recognition and validated by site-directed mutagenesis. Proteins 63: 1059-1068. 126. Wells GA, Birkholtz LM, Joubert F, Walter RD, Louw AI (2006) Novel properties of malarial S-adenosylmethionine decarboxylase as revealed by structural modelling. J Mol Graph Model 24: 307-318. 127. Skolnick J, Fetrow JS, Kolinski A (2000) Structural genomics and its importance for gene function analysis. Nat Biotechnol 18: 283-287. 128. Chakravarty S, Godbole S, Zhang B, Berger S, Sanchez R (2008) Systematic analysis of the effect of multiple templates on the accuracy of comparative models of protein structure. BMC Struct Biol 8: 31. 129. Sánchez R, Pieper U, Melo F, Eswar N, Martí-Renom MA, et al. (2000) Protein structure modeling for structural genomics. Nat Struct Biol 7 Suppl: 986-990. 130. Wu S, Zhang Y (2008) MUSTER: Improving protein sequence profile-profile alignments by using multiple sources of structure information. Proteins 72: 547-556. 131. Kelley LA, Sternberg MJ (2009) Protein structure prediction on the Web: a case study using the Phyre server. Nat Protoc 4: 363-371. 132. Zhang C, Liu S, Zhou H, Zhou Y (2004) An accurate, residue-level, pair potential of mean force for folding and binding based on the distance-scaled, ideal-gas reference state. Protein Sci 13: 400-411. 133. Zhang W, Liu S, Zhou Y (2008) SP5: improving protein fold recognition by using torsion angle profiles and profile-based gap penalty model. PLoS One 3: e2325. 134. Zhou H, Zhou Y (2004) Single-body residue-level knowledge-based energy score combined with sequence-profile and secondary structure information for fold recognition. Proteins 55: 1005-1013. 135. Zhou H, Zhou Y (2005) SPARKS 2 and SP3 servers in CASP6. Proteins 61 Suppl 7: 152-156. 136. Zhou H, Zhou Y (2005) Fold recognition by combining sequence profiles derived from evolution and from depth-dependent structural alignment of fragments. Proteins 58: 321-328. 137. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ (1990) Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215: 403-410. 138. Pearson WR (1991) Searching protein sequence libraries: comparison of the sensitivity and selectivity of the Smith-Waterman and FASTA algorithms. Genomics 11: 635-650. 139. Wu S, Skolnick J, Zhang Y (2007) Ab initio modeling of small proteins by iterative TASSER simulations. BMC Biol 5: 17. 140. Needleman SB, Wunsch CD (1970) A general method applicable to the search for similarities in the amino acid sequence of two proteins. J Mol Biol 48: 443-453. 141. McGuffin LJ, Bryson K, Jones DT (2000) The PSIPRED protein structure prediction server. Bioinformatics 16: 404-405. 142. Pollastri G, Przybylski D, Rost B, Baldi P (2002) Improving the prediction of protein secondary structure in three and eight classes using recurrent neural networks and profiles. Proteins 47: 228-235. 143. Cole C, Barber JD, Barton GJ (2008) The Jpred 3 secondary structure prediction server. Nucleic Acids Res 36: W197-201. 144. Bennett-Lovsey RM, Herbert AD, Sternberg MJ, Kelley LA (2008) Exploring the extremes of sequence/structure space with ensemble fold recognition in the program Phyre. Proteins 70: 611-625. 145. Yang Y, Faraggi E, Zhao H, Zhou Y (2011) Improving protein fold recognition and template-based modeling by employing probabilistic-based matching between predicted one-dimensional structural properties of query and corresponding native properties of templates. Bioinformatics 27: 2076-2082. 146. Rost B, Schneider R, Sander C (1997) Protein fold recognition by prediction-based threading. J Mol Biol 270: 471-480. 147. Liu S, Zhang C, Liang S, Zhou Y (2007) Fold recognition by concurrent use of solvent accessibility and residue depth. Proteins 68: 636-645. 148. Tress M, Ezkurdia I, Graña O, López G, Valencia A (2005) Assessment of predictions submitted for the CASP6 comparative modeling category. Proteins 61 Suppl 7: 27-45. 149. Battey JN, Kopp J, Bordoli L, Read RJ, Clarke ND, et al. (2007) Automated server predictions in CASP7. Proteins 69 Suppl 8: 68-82. 150. Hargbo J, Elofsson A (1999) Hidden Markov models that use predicted secondary structures for fold recognition. Proteins 36: 68-76. 151. Yang Y, Zhou Y (2008) Ab initio folding of terminal segments with secondary structures reveals the fine difference between two closely related all-atom statistical energy functions. Protein Sci 17: 1212-1219. 152. Zhou H, Zhou Y (2002) Distance-scaled, finite ideal-gas reference state improves structure-derived potentials of mean force for structure selection and stability prediction. Protein Sci 11: 2714-2726. 153. Xu J, Li M, Lin G, Kim D, Xu Y (2003) Protein threading by linear programming. Pac Symp Biocomput . 154. Peng J, Xu J (2011) RaptorX: exploiting structure information for protein alignment by statistical inference. Proteins 79 Suppl 10: 161-171. 155. Källberg M, Wang H, Wang S, Peng J, Wang Z, et al. (2012) Template-based protein structure modeling using the RaptorX web server. Nat Protoc 7: 1511-1522. 156. http://raptorx.uchicago.edu 157. Bonneau R, Baker D (2001) Ab initio protein structure prediction: progress and prospects. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 30: 173-189. 158. Moult J, Hubbard T, Fidelis K, Pedersen JT (1999) Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP): round III. Proteins 3: 2–6. 159. Skolnick J, Kolinski A (2002) A unified approach to the prediction of protein structure and function. In: Richard A Friesner (Ed.). Advances in Chemical Physics, Computational Methods for Protein Folding (Volume 120) John Wiley & Sons. Inc., NY, USA.] 160. Floudas CA, Fung HK, McAllister SR, Monnigmann M, Rajgaria R (2006) Advances in Protein Structure Prediction and De Novo Protein Design A Review. Chemical Engineering Science 61: 966-988. 161. Zhang Y, Skolnick J (2004) Tertiary structure predictions on a comprehensive benchmark of medium to large size proteins. Biophys J 87: 2647-2655. 162. Wu S, Zhang Y (2007) LOMETS: a local meta-threading-server for protein structure prediction. Nucleic Acids Res 35: 3375-3382. 163. Zhang Y, Skolnick J (2004) Automated structure prediction of weakly homologous proteins on a genomic scale. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101: 7594-7599. 164. Karplus K, Barrett C, Hughey R (1998) Hidden Markov models for detecting remote protein homologies. Bioinformatics 14: 846-856. OMICS Group eBooks 022
165. Zhang Y, Kolinski A, Skolnick J (2003) TOUCHSTONE II: a new approach to ab initio protein structure prediction. Biophys J 85: 1145-1164. 166. Zhang Y, Kihara D, Skolnick J (2002) Local energy landscape flattening: parallel hyperbolic Monte Carlo sampling of protein folding. Proteins 48: 192-201. 167. Zhang Y, Skolnick J (2004) SPICKER: a clustering approach to identify near-native protein folds. J Comput Chem 25: 865-871. 168. Berenger F, Zhou Y, Shrestha R, Zhang KY (2011) Entropy-accelerated exact clustering of protein decoys. Bioinformatics 27: 939-945. 169. Zhang Y, Skolnick J (2005) TM-align: a protein structure alignment algorithm based on the TM-score. Nucleic Acids Res 33: 2302-2309. 170. Feig M, Rotkiewicz P, Kolinski A, Skolnick J, Brooks CL 3rd (2000) Accurate reconstruction of all-atom protein representations from side-chain-based low-resolution models. Proteins 41: 86-97. 171. Canutescu AA, Shelenkov AA, Dunbrack RL Jr (2003) A graph-theory algorithm for rapid protein side-chain prediction. Protein Sci 12: 2001-2014. 172. Xu D, Zhang Y (2012) Ab initio protein structure assembly using continuous structure fragments and optimized knowledge-based force field. Proteins 80: 1715-1735. 173. http://zhanglab.ccmb.med.umich.edu/PSSpred 174. Thévenet P, Shen Y, Maupetit J, Guyon F, Derreumaux P, et al. (2012) PEP-FOLD: an updated de novo structure prediction server for both linear and disulfide bonded cyclic peptides. Nucleic Acids Res 40: W288-293. 175. Maupetit J, Tuffery P, Derreumaux P (2007) A coarse-grained protein force field for folding and structure prediction. Proteins 69: 394-408. 176. Tuffery P, Guyon F, Derreumaux P (2005) Improved greedy algorithm for protein structure reconstruction. J Comput Chem 26: 506-513. 177. Moult J, Pedersen JT, Judson R, Fidelis K (1995) A large-scale experiment to assess protein structure prediction methods. Proteins 23: ii-v. 178. Tramontano A, Cozzetto D, Giorgetti A, Raimondo D (2008) The assessment of methods for protein structure prediction. Methods Mol Biol 413: 43-57. 179. Cozzetto D, Kryshtafovych A, Fidelis K, Moult J, Rost B, et al. (2009) Evaluation of template-based models in CASP8 with standard measures. Proteins 77 Suppl 9: 18-28. 180. Zemla A (2003) LGA: A method for finding 3D similarities in protein structures. Nucleic Acids Res 31: 3370-3374. 181. Ben-David M, Noivirt-Brik O, Paz A, Prilusky J, Sussman JL, et al. (2009) Assessment of CASP8 structure predictions for template free targets. Proteins 77 Suppl 9: 50-65. 182. http://predictioncenter.org/casp10/index.cgi 183. Zhou P, Tian F, Shang Z (2009) 2D depiction of nonbonding interactions for protein complexes. J Comput Chem 30: 940-951. 184. Pettersen EF, Goddard TD, Huang CC, Couch GS, Greenblatt DM, et al. (2004) UCSF Chimera--a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J Comput Chem 25: 1605-1612. 185. Sanner MF, Olson AJ, Spehner JC (1996) Reduced surface: an efficient way to compute molecular surfaces. Biopolymers 38: 305-320. 186. Ewing TJ, Makino S, Skillman AG, Kuntz ID (2001) DOCK 4.0: search strategies for automated molecular docking of flexible molecule databases. J Comput Aided Mol Des 15: 411-428. 187. Humphrey W, Dalke A, Schulten K (1996) VMD: visual molecular dynamics. J Mol Graph 14: 33-38, 27-8. 188. Nelson M, Humphrey W, Gursoy A, Dalke A, Kal L, et al. (1995) MDScope-A visual computing environment for structural biology. Computer Physics Communications 91: 111-34. [http://journals.ohiolink.edu/ejc/article.cgi?issn=00104655&issue=v91i1-3&article=111_mavcefsb] 189. Phillips JC, Braun R, Wang W, Gumbart J, Tajkhorshid E, et al. (2005) Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD. J Comput Chem 26: 1781-1802. OMICS Group eBooks 023
Page 1 and 2:
www.esciencecentral.org/ebooks Adva
Page 3 and 4:
Tyrosine Nitrated Proteins: Biochem
Page 5 and 6:
[58-61]. Protein sulfhydryls [62] a
Page 7 and 8:
2. Souza JM, Daikhin E, Yudkoff M,
Page 9 and 10:
Oligoclonality of the antibody resp
Page 11 and 12:
The Recent Methodologies of Protein
Page 13 and 14:
are due to altering protein activit
Page 15 and 16:
Figure 6: At Domain Level, Protein
Page 17 and 18:
Brownian Dynamics (BD) method Prote
Page 19 and 20:
protein demonstrate the lowest ener
Page 21 and 22:
Figure 12: Steps in Protein Prepara
Page 23 and 24:
FlexServ The flexibility of protein
Page 25 and 26:
21. van der Kamp MW, Shaw KE, Woods
Page 27 and 28:
Advances in Protein Thermodynamics
Page 29 and 30:
3. Fluorescence correlation spectro
Page 31 and 32:
Figure 3: Molecular Chaperone (Top
Page 33 and 34:
Figure 7: A Potherse is Consists of
Page 35 and 36:
Figure 12: Residue Clusters with Mu
Page 37 and 38:
Figure 16: Various Features at the
Page 39 and 40:
Figure 21: Stability of protein str
Page 41 and 42:
Advances in Protein Chemistry Chapt
Page 43 and 44:
MMPs are believed to remodel the EC
Page 45 and 46:
MMPs7 (Matrilysin, PUMP 1) A big ro
Page 47 and 48:
MMP27 (MMP-22, C-MMP) mRNAs for MMP
Page 49 and 50:
Signal transduction MMP production
Page 51 and 52:
a | Active MMPs are generated throu
Page 53 and 54:
Future Perspective Research into ne
Page 55 and 56: 56. Yonemura Y, Endo Y, Fujita H, K
Page 57 and 58: 126. López-Boado YS, Wilson CL, Ho
Page 59 and 60: Proteins and Peptides- Reemergence
Page 61 and 62: Figure 3: Schematic representation
Page 63 and 64: Figure 6: Different mechanisms of c
Page 65 and 66: [30,33]. Clinical trials with autoi
Page 67 and 68: Therapeutic Proteins Figure 9: Mole
Page 69 and 70: Coming years will witness increasin
Page 71 and 72: Advances in Protein Chemistry Chapt
Page 73 and 74: purification methodology and laid t
Page 75 and 76: An overview of various purification
Page 77 and 78: Affinity chromatography (AC): The p
Page 79 and 80: molecules such as proteins. Further
Page 81 and 82: However, for proteins with poor sol
Page 83 and 84: The schematic of an HPLC instrument
Page 85 and 86: » Denaturation of all proteins giv
Page 89 and 90: the biological society access to th
Page 91 and 92: identifier, since a single macromol
Page 93 and 94: Furthermore, the initial models for
Page 95 and 96: evaluation [78], Whatcheck [79] and
Page 97 and 98: corresponding to gaps in the FR ali
Page 99 and 100: programming (IP) problem based on t
Page 101 and 102: or almost the entire target. - Temp
Page 103 and 104: 3.2.1.10 Geno3D http://geno3d-pbil.
Page 105: 80. Laskowski RA, MacArthur MW, Mos
Page 111 and 112: Figure 1: Biochemical and biophysic
Page 113 and 114: equilibrium an equilibrium concentr
Page 115 and 116: for virtually all macromolecules to
Page 117 and 118: egion) for estimating fraction or p
Page 119 and 120: etween proteins in living cells. It
Page 121 and 122: pre-requisite in understanding how
Page 123 and 124: 82. Rodger A, Marrington R, Roper D
Page 125 and 126: New Peptide Based Therapeutic Appro
Page 127 and 128: ability to selectively target cells
Page 129 and 130: 24 amino acid extracellular domain
Page 131 and 132: separation efficiency. However, use
Page 133 and 134: the peptides through acetylation an
Page 135 and 136: 63. Mesiano AJ, Beckman EJ, Russell
Page 137 and 138: Antimicrob Agents Chemother 49: 330
Page 139 and 140: Protein Detection Techniques Dennis
Page 141 and 142: technique has been applied to the i
Page 143 and 144: involves placing our protein of int
show all

advances-in-protein-chemistry

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?